This commit just copies all the code from MissedMessageSendingWorker
class to a new EmailSendingWorker class. All the logic to send an email
through a queue was already there. This commit only makes the logic
generic. It does so by creating a special purpose queue called
'email_senders' to send any type of email. To make
MissedMessageSendingWorker still work we derive it from
EmailSendingWorker. All the tests that were testing
MissedMessageSendingWorker now run against EmailSendingWorker.
Previous versions of these links were removed earlier today because
Docker upstream had broken them.
To see what the links had been intended to point to, I used the
Wayback Machine (web.archive.org/web), the super-handy project of the
Internet Archive. These are the current equivalents.
The function should execute initially and return a function, not
be a function that when executed returns another function. This
fixes an existing bug.
Currently, users are warned when mentioning @all and @everyone, but not
when posting on the #announce stream. Confirm with users that they want
to send their message on #announce if over 60 people are going to be
notified.
Fixes#6928.
We should move to a design that doesn't require so many success messages,
since each one carries translation risk (e.g. what if the translation is too
long/overflows, or is not a clear translation, etc.). But doing a quick fix
until then.
We get the following error (edited slightly):
Dec 19 06:13:27 commit_messages| An error occurred while executing
'/usr/bin/git rev-list --max-count=-1 upstream/master..HEAD':
fatal: ambiguous argument 'upstream/master..HEAD':
unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
Use '--' to separate paths from revisions, like this:
'git <command> [<revision>...] -- [<file>...]'
We'll need to adjust the remotes to make `upstream` mean what we expect.
This isn't really the right way to do this -- commit
dcd80e665 "travis/setup-backend: Remove the '--travis' flag"
took us in the wrong direction by introducing more magic, deeper in
the stack.
But it's the same way we do it for Travis. For now, just copy that.
[Thanks to hackerkid for cleaning up my original crude hack.]
At this point if we were accidentally using `/srv/zulip-venv` for
anything, we'd have run into it by now. So just drop the bit of
historical logic that we had to ensure that.
We introduced this a couple of commits ago (in #7782) for use in the
tests only. Putting it here avoids pulling in a new dependency in
production which we don't use there.
Such payloads are generated when a GitLab repository has merge
request approvals enabled and a project member approves a merge
request. Approving is not the same as merging.
Umair Khan
Vishnu Ks
Jeremy Zhou
neiljp (Neil Pilgrim)
Greg Price
Steve Howell
Brock Whittaker
Rishi Gupta
Marco Burstein
snlkapil
ViRu-ThE-ViRuS
Eeshan Garg
Andy Perez
Andy Perez
Callum Fraser
Utkarsh Patil
civilnewsnetwork
cPhost