https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.1/releases/3.1/
- django.contrib.postgres.fields.JSONField is deprecated and should be
replaced with models.JSONField
- The internals of the implementation in the postgresql backend have
changed a bit in
f48f671223
and thus we need to make an ugly tweak in test_runner.
- app_directories.Loader.get_dirs() now returns a list of PosixPath so
we need to make a small tweak in TwoFactorLoader for that (PosixPath
is not iterable)
Fixes#16010.
This commit updates the Zulip User-Agent to
'Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; ZulipURLPreview/{version}; +{external_host})'
as the older User-Agent was rendering Markdown YouTube titles as
'YouTube - YouTube'.
Fixes#16970.
c2526844e9 removed the `signups` queue
worker, and the command-line tool that enqueues to it -- but not the
automated process that enqueues during signups itself.
Remove the signup, since it is no longer in use.
Previously, the data type of parameters wasn't displayed in the API
Documentation, even though that OpenAPI data is carefully validated
against the implementation. Here we add a recursive function to
render the data types visibly in the API documentation.
This only covers the request parameters; we'll want to do something
similar for response parameters in a follow-up PR.
Fixes part of #15967.
When we were getting an apply_event call for
a subscription/add event, we were trying not to
mutate the event itself, but this clumsy code
was still mutating the actual event:
# Avoid letting 'subscribers' entries end up in the list
for i, sub in enumerate(event['subscriptions']):
event['subscriptions'][i] = \
copy.deepcopy(event['subscriptions'][i])
del event['subscriptions'][i]['subscribers']
This is only a theoretical bug.
The only person who receives a subscription/add
event is the current user.
And it wouldn't have affected the current user,
since the apply_event was correctly updating the
state, and we wouldn't actually deliver the event
to the client (because the whole point of apply_event
is to prevent us from having to piggyback the
super-recent events on to our payload or put
them into the event queue and possibly race).
The new code just cleanly makes a copy of each
sub, if necessary, as we add them to state["subscriptions"].
And I updated the event schemas to reflect that
subscribers is always present in subscription/add
event.
Long term we should probably avoid sending subscribers
on this event when the clients don't set something
like include_subscribers. That's a fairly complicated
fix that involves passing in flags to ClientDescriptor.
Alternatively, we could just say that our policy is
that we never send subscribers there, but we instead
use peer_add events. See issue #17089 for more
details.
It's always cleaner to work in id space. It probably
would have required a perfect storm to have broken
the existing code, but using ids is obviously more
robust in theory, and just as simple.
We now require keywords, so that there is no
pitfall for mixing up boolean parameters.
Positional parameters are basically evil
when you have a bunch of bools.
I also make user_profile the first argument.
Finally, the code is more diff-friendly.
I eliminate the defaults, since the existing code
was already specificying values for most things.
I move all the booleans to the bottom for both
parameters and arguments.
I require explicit keywords for everything but
user_profile (which is now first).
And, finally, I format the code in a more
diff-friendly manner.
We eliminate some redundant checks.
We also consistently provide a `subscribers` field
in our stream data with `[]`, even if our users
can't access subscribers. We therefore bump
the API version and tweak the docs. (See further
down for a detailed justification of the change.)
Even though it is sometimes fine to have redundant code
that is defensive in nature, some upcoming changes are gonna
move subscriber-related logic out of build_stream_dict_for_sub
for certain codepaths as part of our effort to streamline
the payload for subscribers within page_params.
So we can't rely on the code that I removed here
inside of build_stream_dict_for_sub.
Anyway, it makes more sense to do these checks explicitly
in the validate function.
The code in build_stream_dict_for_sub was almost effectively
a noop, since the validation function was already preventing
us from getting subscriber info. The only difference it
made was sometimes converting `[]` to `None`, and then
subsequently omitting the subscribers field.
Neither ZT nor the webapp make any distinction between
`[]` or <missing key> for the `subscribers` data in
`page_params`.
The webapp has had this code for a long time (and now
equivalent code elsewhere in this PR):
if (!Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(sub, "subscribers")) {
sub.subscribers = new LazySet([]);
}
The webapp calculates access based on booleans, anyway:
sub.can_access_subscribers =
page_params.is_admin || sub.subscribed ||
(!page_params.is_guest && !sub.invite_only);
And ZT would choke if `subscribers` were missing, except that
it never gets to the relevant code due to other checks:
def get_other_subscribers_in_stream(<snip>):
assert stream_id is not None or stream_name is not None
if stream_id:
assert self.is_user_subscribed_to_stream(stream_id)
return [sub
for sub in self.stream_dict[stream_id]['subscribers']
if sub != self.user_id]
else:
return [sub
for _, stream in self.stream_dict.items()
for sub in stream['subscribers']
if stream['name'] == stream_name
if sub != self.user_id]
You could make a semantic argument that we should prefer
<missing key> to `[]` when subscribers aren't even available, but
we have precedent from the way that `bulk_get_subscriber_user_ids`
has traditionally populated its result:
result: Dict[int, List[int]] =
{stream["id"]: [] for stream in stream_dicts}
If we changed `stream_dicts` to `target_stream_dicts` we
would faciliate a move toward `None`, but it would just cause
headaches for other server code as well as the frontends
(which, to reiterate, already prefer the empty array
for convenience).
As my comment indicates, I would prefer to handle
this explicitly by raising JsonableError in an
else statement here, but it's not a big deal.
This function can probably be simplified with a
bit of work, mostly on the testing side to make
sure we are covering all edge cases, but that
is out of the scope of my current PR.
By moving the relevant logic from realm.get_bot_domain to
get_fake_email_domain we will make realm.host be used (if possible) for
dummy user addresses. That is, instead of user11@zulipchat.com, the
address will become user11@subdomain.zulipchat.com.
We often send only one field (away or status_text)
to be updated.
So we have to make our schema support optional
keys.
As a result of the more flexible schema, we no
longer need to exempt the node fixtures from
our schema checks.
Since recipient_id (id of the PERSONAL Recipient of the user) was
denormalized into the UserProfile model, this query can be simplified by
getting rid of the zerver_recipient JOIN.
This makes us more efficient when handling
multiple users. We don't have to keep
sending the same two queries to the database.
Note that as part of this we eliminated
a failure mode for the obscure population
of users from whom both `user.is_guest` and
`user.can_access_public_streams()` returns
False. We know this would have only affected
Zephyr users (by looking at the code), and
we know we don't actually process Zephyr
users for email digests (or else we would
have raised exceptions in the old code).
We mostly need realm_id, but when we go to build
message lists, we need realm.uri.
We could probably be more aggresive about using
`only` here, but for now I am just trying to
reduce hops to the database.
The `deployment` key was only set in `do_report_error`, which is now
only used in one codepath (the queue worker). The logging handlers on
staging call notify_server_error directly, which omits the
`deployment` key.
Remove the odd one-of key, and instead simply do dispatch in
`do_report_error`.
The codepath for moving a topic changes the message.recipient_id to the
id of the new recipient, but later, in update_messages_for_topic_edit,
it uses message.recipient when querying for messages with the matching
topic in the *old* stream (because those are the other messages that
need to be moved). This is a bug which happens to work fine, because in
Django 2, if message.recipient gets fetched first and then
message.recipient_id is mutated, message.recipient will not be altered
and thus will retain the outdated, previously fetched value.
In Django 3 changing .recipient_id causes .recipient to be updated to
the new Recipient objects, which is the Recipient of the *new* stream.
That will cause the bug to manifest.
This is a bugfix preparing for the upgrade to Django 3.
Support for saving it in the session is dropped in django3, the cookie
is the mechanism that needs to be used. The relevant i18n code doesn't
have access to the response objects and thus needs to delegate setting
the cookie to LocaleMiddleware.
Fixes the LocaleMiddleware point of #16030.
We now require explicit keywords for all arguments
to fetch_initial_state_data except user_profile.
We provide reasonable defaults to keep the test
code concise.
When changing the subdomain of a realm, create a deactivated realm with
the old subdomain of the realm, and set its deactivated_redirect to the
new subdomain.
Doing this will help us to do the following:
- When a user visits the old subdomain of a realm, we can tell the user
that the realm has been moved.
- During the registration process, we can assure that the old subdomain
of the realm is not used to create a new realm.
If the subdomain is changed multiple times, the deactivated_redirect
fields of all the deactivated realms are updated to point to the new
uri.
Instead of just storing the edit history in the message which
triggered the topic edit, we store the edit history in all
the messages that changed. This helps users track the edit history
of a message more reliably.
Allowing any admins to create arbitrary users is not ideal because it
can lead to abuse issues. We should require something stronger that
requires the server operator's approval and thus we add a new
can_create_users permission.
We change the return type of check_message to be dataclass instead of
Dict[str, Any]. This refactoring helps us to understand the context of the
data structure returned by check_message clearly which was not possible
when using Dict.
SendMessageRequest class is added in zerver/lib/message.py inspite of it
not being used in that file itself just to maintain consistency as other
TypedDicts and dataclasses are defined in that file and to avoid circular
dependency as SendMessageRequest is being used in lib/widget.py as well.
We also rename local variable to 'send_request' for accessing
SendMessageRequest objects.
We always want to do these at the same time. Previously, message
editing did too much stripping (fixes#16837) and failed to check for
NUL bytes.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Previously we were just returning a dict containing a message id when
trying to mirror a already sent message in 'zephyr_mirror' cases.
This commit changes this behaviour to raise an exception when trying
to mirror an already sent message by adding a new exception class
ZephyrMessageAlreadySentException and then the caller returns the
message_id directly, instead of calling do_send_messages which also
returns a list of size one containing the message_id only.
This is a prep commit for changing the return type of check_message to
be a dataclass instead of a Dict as now we have only single output for
check_message.
This commit renames the content variable in do_widget_post_save_actions
to message_content and is a prep commit for changing the return type of
check_message from Dict to dataclass.
This change is required because content variable is used two times in
this function - one for message content and other for submessage
content, so when we change the return type of check_message to
dataclass, the type of content variable is considered as str and then
when dict is assigned to content in the submessage case, mypy raises
'Incompatible types in assignment' error.
This issue is not faced before the dataclass migration because there is
no type checking for the values of dict returned by check_message as the
return type of check_message is 'Dict[str, Any]'.
The message_dict['wildcard_mention_user_ids'] should be empty set instead
of empty list when there are no wildcard mentions similar to the case
when there are wildcard mentions, where it is equal to set of user ids and
not list of user ids.
I reformatted the tests and view to include information about who
acknowledged and closed the alert. Only includes the information about
the owner if there was an owner.
Made a few small changes to the refactored bit as requested in review.
Anders Kaseorg
Mateusz Mandera
akshatdalton
Alex Vandiver
Suyash Vardhan Mathur
Steve Howell
Tim Abbott
Siddharth Asthana
Aman Agrawal
sahil839
Max Zawisa