NOTE: If you revert this commit, you want to revert
the immediately prior commit as well. The history
is that Ishan made some improvements to the widget,
but there were some minor bugs. I decided not
to squash the commits together so that the git
history is clear who did what. (In particular, I
want questions about the JS code to come to me if
somebody does `git blame`.)
Anyway...
This is a fairly significant rewrite of the polling
widget, where I clean up the overall structure of
the code (including things from before the prior
fix) and try to polish the prior commit a bit as
well.
There are a few new features:
* We tell "other" users to wait for the poll
to start (if there's no question yet).
* We tip the author to say "/poll foo" (as
needed).
* We add edit controls for the question.
* We don't allow new choices until there's
a question.
The goal here was to enforce 100% coverage on
parse_narrow, but the code has an unreachable line
and is overly tolerant of bogus urls. This will
be fixed in the next commit.
We now let color_data keep its own state for
unused_colors, so that we longer have to pass in
a large list of unused_colors every time we want
to assign a new stream color.
This mostly matters at startup, where we might
be cycling through 5000 streams. We claim all
the unused colors up front.
Each operation now has an upper bound of expensiveness,
where the worst case scenario is basically popping
off the first element of a list of <= 24 colors.
The algorithm is now deterministic, too, to make
it easier to test. It's unclear whether random color
assignment ever had much benefit, and it made unit
testing the algorithm difficult. Now we have 100%
line coverage.
Fixes part of #10902.
We don't use input.create_non_editable_pill() in our
code yet. If we add this back, we'll want to have node
tests on it.
Removing this unused code brings us to 100% line
coverage for input_pill.js.
This directly reverts 5c11ab85 with the small addition
of adding input_pill to our list of fully covered
modules.
We probably should have done this a while ago, even
though these functions are pretty tiny. The goal here
is to make it easier to have more consistent search
semantics.
Our first use case is subs.js. In this case we
are able to decouple a bit of generic string
matching from the subs-specific code.
Adds search_pill.js to the static asset pipeline. The items
for search pill contain 2 keys, display_value and search_string.
Adding all the operator information i.e the operator, operand and
negated fields along with the search_string and description was tried out.
It was dropped because it didn't provide any advantage as one had to
always calculate the search_string and the description from the operator.
This starts the concept of a schema checker, similar to
zerver/lib/validator.py on the server. We can use this
to validate incoming data. Our server should filter most
of our incoming data, but it's useful to have client-side
checking to defend against things like upgrade
regressions (i.e. what if we change the name of the field
on the server side without updating all client uses).
I mistakenly pushed a PR when my tests failed. I ran with
the coverage option, so I saw this brightly colored summary
report that distracted me from the failure message.
This adds a couple newlines and some all caps.
The timezone environment variable was set to UTC initially. It was
changed to something other than UTC so that any local vs UTC
conversion issues will manifest in the tests.
Fixes: #5105.
This was a bit more than moving code. I extracted the
following things:
$widget (and three helper methods)
$input
text()
empty()
expand_column
close_widget
activity.clear_highlight
There was a minor bug before this commit, where we were inconsistent
about trimming spaces. The introduction of text() and empty() should
prevent bugs where users type the space bar into search.
We now allow you to run --coverage on individual files. This helps
when you want to make sure a file is being covered directly and not
just getting incidental coverage from higher level tests.
Before this commit, we were conflating wanting coverage reports with
wanting coverage checks. For individual files, we now solve that by
simply eliminating the coverage checks. This required some minor
refactoring to extract some functions.
Added support for passing a filename without `.js` suffix.
This then fixed the issue of no complaints for invalid test
files. Now, throws an error for invalid test files.
Fixes#8579.
Vishnu Ks
Anders Kaseorg
Steve Howell
Tim Abbott
Joshua Pan
Shubham Dhama
Shubham Padia
Sivakar Sithamparanathan
Priyank Patel
Tarun Kumar
YJDave