It's pretty confusing if this doesn't change. In some other world we
could update the fade, but since we're currently only fading on reply,
I think it would be weird to update the fade when you're picking a new
recipient.
(imported from commit 8f77419d443d578068b57f847354ac6da7632ee2)
This is in response to the following bug report by Evan Broder:
FYI, it looks like if I accidentally tab to the "Formatting" link and
hit enter, it erases the message (and replaces it with a reply to
whatever the selected message is, I think?)
This is subtle and here's why: Suppose you have the focus on a
stream name in your left sidebar. j and k will still move your
cursor up and down, but Enter won't reply -- it'll just trigger
the link on the sidebar! So you keep pressing enter over and
over again. Until you click somewhere or press r.
Net-net though, I think it's a change worth making, because
it's good for keyboard accessibility.
(imported from commit b65bcc0abbc751718bb03d418c03961b9ed9e42b)
Long-term we probably want to pick the render window size and
re-render threshold based on the user's window height instead of
arbitrarily.
When we re-render we probably also want to ensure that the newly
selected message appears in the same location as it would have
before the re-render.
(imported from commit f044b7f2200822e8e6e8dba7108d087a69016134)
Messages are now selected on a MessageList, which triggers a
message_selected event that other parts of the code can listen for.
(imported from commit 1da9e4121425c0ac4461b41b7aea169072e1512b)
That way it is visible more consistently when arrowing through
messages (arrowing causes scroll events).
(imported from commit ba629b907e4e593032a61a10b04f00e592fe8427)
Prior to this commit, if you have the composebox open, pressing 'c' or
'C' clears its contents. This change makes it work more analogously to
pressing the 'New stream message'/'New private message' buttons.
(imported from commit 3de5bf83754d8ab86b1967ce2ba15f5846090667)
This fixes https://trac.humbughq.com/ticket/546.
It's a little unpleasant that this special-casing lives in hotkey.js
-- instead you could imagine doing something where there was a whole
special set of hotkeys when a search is active, like we do with the
composebox, but this gets the job and is probably simplest.
I would have written this as a case that just falls through in the
else condition, but jslint doesn't like that.
(imported from commit 65a1b8aa1efc356b6690dc177058a4fb9e12745a)
feedback-bot and zephyr_mirror will need to be updated and restarted
when this is deployed to prod.
(imported from commit fe2b524424c174bcb1b717a851a5d3815fda3f69)
With the removal of process_compose_hotkey, the state machine now has only one
state. Everything else is based on things like "is a text box focused right
now", which is probably a better approach.
(imported from commit 0e39c03956d28e30d2bdbf3b285410ad0cacca3e)
If we don't do this, we get all kinds of nasty shadowing where
references to 'search.whatever' seem to be references to the
HTML input element, rather than our search.js module.
(imported from commit 4e4b562ddf895baea9619316d9fab27ae5e9fc4e)
Personals are now just private messages between two people (which
sometimes manifests as a private message with one recipient). The
new message type on the send path is 'private'. Note that the receive
path still has 'personal' and 'huddle' message types.
(imported from commit 97a438ef5c0b3db4eb3e6db674ea38a081265dd3)
Mixing these two in this file is bound to lead to a world of hurt (and
has, historically). At some point I'd like to do this across the
entire codebase.
(imported from commit 9ff029597587f9c37a0bd9f32c25a769aa1a7a20)
This makes the "handle hotkeys" code path a lot simpler, and also
fixes the "copy not working" issue we were seeing on Firefox 17.
(imported from commit 8ab96d12895da2876f60da58f373372612f4ba32)
The original check has become too broad now that we have more buttons,
and specifically this lets you use the search hotkey to start a new
search after you've been searching up and down.
(imported from commit 0e691ff55ff9d4be8d406d1eb47fc2062758d28b)
The comment on keydown_handler says that these functions should
"return a new handler, or 'false' to decline to handle the event."
(imported from commit 8cd23ee69ef900fcb7c7c211fe6ad36f54f02ba9)
The fact that we're inconsistent about this in our functions
is definitely going to lead to more bugs of this form
down the road.
(imported from commit 907badcb28c0834729e21436c621255fa6584d44)