There is no reason not to initialize people.js
super early in the process, as it only reads
data from page_params. Also, other modules
are likely to want its data during their own
initialization steps.
This is the preferred way to check that a user
id belongs to the current user.
We have a recent bug where the current user's
circle doesn't turn green right away. It's not
clear this is the fix, though. (It's hard to
repro locally.)
When trying to find the email gateway address, use the
`email.util.getaddresses` function to deal with cases
where multiple recipients are included in the email header
or the stream address appears as an angle-addr with a
name given (e.g. if someone added it to their address book).
Added some other headers where the required address may
appear: "Resent" headers are sometimes used for forwarding,
and streams may also be found in CC. There is no way to find
the address if the email was recieved as a BCC.
This should hopefully be the last commit of this form; ultimately, my
hope is that we'll be able to refactor the semi-duplicated logic in
this file to avoid so much effort going into keeping this correct.
Apparently, our thumbor logic assumed S3_REGION would be present in
prod_settings.py. While it is in newer Zulip releases, upgraded
servers won't have a copy of this field.
This now checks if the user is zulip, and if not, switches to the
zulip user, making it possible to run it as root.
Significantly modified by tabbott to not break existing behavior.
This is mostly for testing purposes. The code
structure here is pretty stable--we will probably
always use level() here to either sort or
group users, and being able to test it directly
is nice, rather than bringing in all the other
machinery.
For many actions, we make a single call to
send_event, and it's kind of heavy now to
properly assert we made one call, and we
don't need to exercise all the tornado code
to prove that the action was written correctly.
This makes it possible it include our standard markdown formatting in
one's custom profile fields, allowing for links, emphasis, emoji, etc.
Fixes#10131.
While we're at it, we remove the JSON parsing that was part of the
user field code path, since this function isn't responsible for
rendering user fields.
Apparently, our custom profile fields feature was parsing the "user
list" field type in multiple places, and ignoring the results in one
of them. That code had been causing some confusion; the correct
solution is to just delete it, since the template rendering process
ignores that value for this field type.
rht
AsociTon
Steve Howell
varunvaruns9
Tom Daff
Tim Abbott
Shubham Dhama
Fabian Tribrunner
Hemanth V. Alluri