We tighten up the mypy types here. And then
once we know that expected_message and expected_topic
are never None, we don't have call the do_test_message
and do_test_topic helpers any more, so we eliminate
them, too.
Finally, we don't return a message, since no tests
use the message currently.
If we're not passing in expected_topic or expected_message
to check_webhook, it's better to just call send_webhook_payload,
since we'll want to explicitly check our messages
anyway.
This preps us to always require those fields for
check_webhook, which can prevent insidious testing no-ops.
This forces us to be a bit more explicit about testing
the three key values in any stream message, and it
also de-clutters the code a bit. I eventually want
to phase out do_test_topic and friends, since they
have the pitfall that you can call them and have them
do nothing, because they don't actually require
values to be be passed in.
I also clean up the code a bit for the tests that
have two new messages arriving.
Having an optional stream_name parameter makes
it confusing to read the code if you know your
webhook is sending private messages.
And then the other two callers are already
checking topics, so they might as well check
stream names, too.
We also have the two stream-oriented callers
make their own call to "subscribe". And we
future-proof this by making sure the exception
for no-message-being-sent calls out that gotcha.
Somewhat in passing, we now assert that
self.STREAM_NAME is not None in the main
helper. This is partly to satisfy mypy, but
it's also a good sanity check.
This also sets the stage for the next commit,
where I'll add an assert_stream_message helper.
Not all webhook payloads are json, so send_json_payload was a
bit misleading.
In passing I also remove "bytes" from the Union type for
"payload" parameter.
Almost all webhook tests use this helper, except a few
webhooks that write to private streams.
Being concise is important here, and the name
`self.send_and_test_stream_message` always confused
me, since it sounds you're sending a stream message,
and it leaves out the webhook piece.
We should consider renaming `send_and_test_private_message`
to something like `check_webhook_private`, but I couldn't
decide on a great name, and it's very rarely used. So
for now I just made sure the docstrings of the two
sibling functions reference each other.
The "EXPECTED_" prefix and "_EVENTS" suffix
usually provided more noise than signal.
We also use module constants to avoid the "self."
noise. It also makes it a bit more clear which
constants actually have to be in the class (e.g.
"FIXTURE_DIR_NAME") to do their job.
This function is a bad idea, as it leads to a possible situation
where you aren't actually testing anything:
def do_test_message(self, msg: Message, expected_message: Optional[str]) -> None:
if expected_message is not None:
self.assertEqual(msg.content, expected_message)
Unfortunately, it's called deep in the stack in some places, but
we can safely replace it with assertEqual here.
We had optional parameters for expected_topic and
expected_message, which are trivial to eliminate,
since the integration is really simple.
And we were doing strange things trying to reset
class variables at the end of tests. Now we just
set them explicitly in the tests.
The test helper here was taking an "expected_topic"
parameter that it just ignored, and then the
dialogflow tests were passing in expected messages
in that slot, so the actual "expected_message" var
was "None" and was ignored. So the tests weren't
testing anything.
Now we eliminate the crufty expected_topic parameter
and require an actual value for "expected_message".
I also clean up the mypy type for content_type,
and I remove the `content_type is None` check,
since all callers either pass in a str content
type or default to "application/json".
Some `<img>` tags do not have an SRC, if they are rewritten using JS
to have one later. Attempting to access `first_image['src']` on these
will raise an exception, as they have no such attribute.
Only look for images which have a defined `src` attribute on them. We
could instead check if `first_image.has_attr('src')`, but this seems
only likely to produce fewer valid images.
03ca3afbc2 added more codes that are equivalent to 404's; this adds to
the list of cache-as-None codes a couple which are equivalent to
403's. It does not comprise _all_ possible 403-like codes -- many of
them are "the client is not OK," which is relevant to log as an error
still.
Per [1], the sentry API returns frames sorted from oldest to newest.
As such, matching against the first filename that matches is most
likely not the right frame.
Match against the last frame with the guilty filename.
[1] https://develop.sentry.dev/sdk/event-payloads/stacktrace/
The original commit was broken here:
b553507412
The intention was to run the same loop for all
settings, but instead, we did a funny loop of
just resetting schema_checker, and then we only
actually tested the last value of the loop.
This commit adds "role" field to the Subscription objects passed to
clients. This is important preparation for being able to work on the
frontend for this feature.
While exporting analytics data we were using wrong table name
'zerver_analytics' in analytics config. Renamed it with
correct table name 'zerver_realm'.
Since bug https://bugs.python.org/issue3445 was resolved in Python
3.3, we can avoid the use of assigned=available_attrs(view_func) in
wraps decorator (which we were only using because we'd copied code
that handled that from Django).
Also available_attrs is now depreciated from Django 3.0 onwards.
Django 3.0 removed private Python 2 compatibility APIs
so used lru_cache() directly from functools.
We cast lru_cache to Any to avoid attr-defined error in mypy since we
are adding extra field, 'key_prefix', to this object later.
This comment stopped being true in 5686821150, and very much stopped
being relevant in dd40649e04 when the middleware entirely stopped
publishing to a queue.
This function now matches the copy in zerver/lib/actions.py.
This is the same migration as
b250e42f61c525029bd2b3bbb8f4ea93ece62072; orjson enforces that we
don't use integers as keys in JSON dictionaries.
Apparently, we were incorrectly using constants for title/description
rather than the nice non-constant values from og:title and
og:description in our meta tags.
This commit adds the is_web_public field in the AbstractAttachment
class. This is useful when validating user access to the attachment,
as otherwise we would have to make a query in the db to check if
that attachment was sent in a message in a web-public stream or not.
The new Stream administrator role is allowed to manage a stream they
administer, including:
* Setting properties like name, description, privacy and post-policy.
* Removing subscribers
* Deactivating the stream
The access_stream_for_delete_or_update is modified and is used only
to get objects from database and further checks for administrative
rights is done by check_stream_access_for_delete_or_update.
We have also added a new exception class StreamAdministratorRequired.
This commit adds role field to the Subscription class. Currently,
there are two option of roles - STREAM_ADMINISTRATOR and MEMBER.
We also add a property 'is_stream_admin' for checking whether the
user is stream admin or not.
Via API, users can now access messages which are in web-public
streams without any authentication.
If the user is not authenticated, we assume it is a web-public
query and add `streams:web-public` narrow if not already present
to the narrow. web-public streams are also directly accessible.
Any malformed narrow which is not allowed in a web-public query
results in a 400 or 401. See test_message_fetch for the allowed
queries.
django.security.DisallowedHost is only one of a set of exceptions that
are "SuspiciousOperation" exceptions; all return a 400 to the user
when they bubble up[1]; all of them are uninteresting to Sentry.
While they may, in bulk, show a mis-configuration of some sort of the
application, such a failure should be detected via the increase in
400's, not via these, which are uninteresting individually.
While all of these are subclasses of SuspiciousOperation, we enumerate
them explicitly for a number of reasons:
- There is no one logger we can ignore that captures all of them.
Each of the errors uses its own logger, and django does not supply
a `django.security` logger that all of them feed into.
- Nor can we catch this by examining the exception object. The
SuspiciousOperation exception is raised too early in the stack for
us to catch the exception by way of middleware and check
`isinstance`. But at the Sentry level, in `add_context`, it is no
longer an exception but a log entry, and as such we have no
`isinstance` that can be applied; we only know the logger name.
- Finally, there is the semantic argument that while we have decided
to ignore this set of security warnings, we _may_ wish to log new
ones that may be added at some point in the future. It is better
to opt into those ignores than to blanket ignore all messages from
the security logger.
This moves the DisallowedHost `ignore_logger` to be adjacent to its
kin, and not on the middleware that may trigger it. Consistency is
more important than locality in this case.
Of these, the DisallowedHost logger if left as the only one that is
explicitly ignored in the LOGGING configuration in
`computed_settings.py`; it is by far the most frequent, and the least
likely to be malicious or impactful (unlike, say, RequestDataTooBig).
[1] https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.0/ref/exceptions/#suspiciousoperation
These weren’t wrong since orjson.JSONDecodeError subclasses
json.JSONDecodeError which subclasses ValueError, but the more
specific ones express the intention more clearly.
(ujson raised ValueError directly, as did json in Python 2.)
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This adds 'user_id' to the simple success response for 'POST /users'
api endpoint, to make it convenient for API clients to get details
about users they just created. Appropriate changes have been made in
the docs and test_users.py.
Fixes#16072.
These escapes are valid YAML 1.2 (for JSON compatibility) but not
valid YAML 1.1, which means they don’t work with the faster
yaml.CSafeLoader that we’d like to transition to.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Steve Howell
Alex Vandiver
sahil839
Tim Abbott
arpit551
Clara Dantas
Aman Agrawal
Anders Kaseorg
Kartik Srivastava
palash