This commit replaces boolean field add_emoji_by_admins_only with an
integer field add_custom_emoji_policy as we would also add full members
and moderators option for this setting in further commits.
This commit replaces the allow_community_topic_editing boolean with
integer field edit_topic_policy and includes both frontend and
backend changes.
We also update settings_ui.disable_sub_settings_onchange to not
change the color of label as we did previously when the setting
was a checkbox. But now as the setting is dropdown we keep the
label as it is and we don't do anything with label when disabling
dropdowns. Also, this function was used only here so we can safely
change this.
This commit divides the user_invite_restriction setting dropdown to
a checkbox and a dropdown.
The checkbox is used for 'realm_invite_required' setting and dropdown
for 'realm_invite_to_realm_policy'.
This separation of UI elements is fine as these two settings are
separate in database also and also helps in removing excess if-else
conditions and switch cases.
The message-editing section of settings is moved from "Organization
Settings" to "Organization Permissions", which feels like a more
natural place for these settings.
This commit adds the dropdown in 'Stream settings' section of organization
permissions page to control who can move messages between streams and
also hides the stream-edit UI in message-edit form accordingly.
Fixes#14499.
This commit adds 'admins and moderators' option in frontend for
invite_to_realm_policy.
The logic for moderator for checking whether user is allowed to invite
others or not was added in previous commit as we use common helper
user_has_permission for all policies.
But the test user_can_invite_others_to_relam is updated for including
moderator role in this commit.
This commit replaces different objects - create_stream_policy_values,
invite_to_realm_policy_values and invite_to_stream_policy_values,
with a single object common_policy_values.
Though invite_to_realm_policy do not use other fields of objects like
description, order, etc. but we can keep it as it is for now as we
would separate this setting from "Are invitations required...."
dropdown and these fields will be used then.
This is a prep commit for commits that will add helper functions in
settings_data for these policies replacing the usage of page_params
object.
There are actually two dropdowns for wildcard mention setting,
which would have been added mistakenly while changing the label
and position during merging the original commit for adding this
setting.
This commit removes the extra dropdown dropdown in Other
Permissions subsection and retains the one in Stream
Permissions subsection.
As a consequence of too many options in the bottom `Other permissions`
subsection, the `Save` button could end up too far up from the bottom,
such that it might appear offscreen on low-height laptops.
We fix this by reorganizing the settings in a way that is both more
intuitive and also ensures that none of the subsections are too tall.
Fixes: #14274.
This change is in series of de-duplication of code in "Other permission"
section for various dropdowns.
Here rather than using "by_anyone" and "disabled" for the `value` attribute
of options, we use actual numeric values. As a result, we don't need to
manually handle to extract the data to be sent to the backend on saving.
This change is in series of de-duplication of code in "Other permission"
section for various dropdowns.
Here rather than using "by_admins_only" and "by_admins_only" for `value`
attribute of options, we use actual numeric values. This helps in
de-duplicating lot of code which is vulnerable to bugs.
For few settings like `waiting_period_threshold` it makes sense to have the
"value" attribute of option to have a value other than the actual setting
value because multiple settings are depending upon this dropdown, so
handling them in JS code makes more sense. But for many settings (which has
integer values), we have followed a wrong trend over the time of
representing every new dropdown with human-readable values and manually
handling them in JS Code, where it makes more sense to use actual setting
value. The result of which is code has become less concise, sensible and
less likely to be mistaken.
This is a preliminary commit for upcoming change where we will use
"bot_creation_policy_values" like approach for many other settings where
dropdown represents the only single setting of integer type.
This experimental setting disables sending private messages in Zulip
in a crude way (i.e. users get an error when they try to send one).
It makes no effort to adjust the UI to avoid advertising the idea of
sending private messages.
Fixes#6617.
sahil839
Pragati Agrawal
Tim Abbott
Siddharth Varshney
Matheus Melo
Anders Kaseorg