This commit just copies all the code from MissedMessageSendingWorker
class to a new EmailSendingWorker class. All the logic to send an email
through a queue was already there. This commit only makes the logic
generic. It does so by creating a special purpose queue called
'email_senders' to send any type of email. To make
MissedMessageSendingWorker still work we derive it from
EmailSendingWorker. All the tests that were testing
MissedMessageSendingWorker now run against EmailSendingWorker.
The original logic is buggy now that emails can belong to (and be
invited to) multiple realms.
The new logic in the `invites` queue worker also avoids the bug where
when the PreregistrationUser was gone by the time the queue worker got
to the invite (e.g., because it'd been revoked), we threw an exception.
[greg: fix upgrade-compatibility logic; add test; explain
revoked-invite race above]
Because we use access_stream_by_id here, and that checks for an active
subscription to interact with a private stream, this didn't work.
The correct fix to add an option to active_stream_by_id to accept an
argument indicating whether we need an active subscription; for this
use case, we definitely do not.
There's one migration required by this release:
* queue_processors: Stop passing state_handler to handle_message.
state_handler is now a property of bot_handler and thus, does
not need to be passed to bot_handler.handle_message().
The commit responsible is:
2a74ad11c5
This fixes a bug where, when a user is unsubscribed from a stream,
they might have unread messages on that stream leak. While it might
seem to be a minor problem, it can cause significant problems for
computing the `unread_msgs` data structures, since it means we need to
add an extra filter for whether the user is still subscribed, either
in the backend or in the UI.
Fixes#7095.
This fixes a regression in 25c669df52.
We were draining the queue in both the superclass and the subclass,
so by the time the subclass started processing events, there were
no events to process. Now the subclass properly uses the events
passed in from the superclass.
The os.mkdir call is straightforward and doesn't testing.
Workers relying on LoopQueueProcessingWorker are tested
with its consume method that exists solely for this purpose.
This should help make it easier to add tests coverage for these queue
processors, since they now use a system more similar to the other
queue processors.
This replaces the former non-functional StateHandler
stub with a dictionary-like state object. Accessing it will
will read and store strings in the BotUserStateData model.
Each bot has a limited state size. To enforce this limit while
keeping data updates efficient, StateHandler caches the expensive
query for getting a bot's total state size. Assignments to a key
then only need to fetch that entry's previous size, if any, and
compare it to the new entry's size.
Previously, invitation reminder emails were only being cleared after a
successful signup if newsletter_data was available, since that was the
circumstance in which we were calling the relevant queue processor
code. Now, we (1) clear them when a human user finishes signing up
and (2) correctly clear them using the 'address' field of
ScheduleEmail, not user_id.
There is no reason for either render_incoming_message() or
render_markdown() to require full UserProfile objects just to
triage alert words.
By only asking for user_ids, we save extra queries in two
callpaths and we make it easier to start using user_ids in
do_send_messages().
Add test to check if the embedded bot service being used is in the
registry or not.
Add test to check if the bot being added to the registry has a valid
bot corresponding to it.
Move 'get_bot_handler' to 'zerver/lib/bot_lib.py' as it is an independent
function, not related to the 'EmbeddedBotWorker' class that it was
previously a part of.
This fixes some error message strings and skips converting request_data
into json. From now, conversion would be the responsibility of interface.
Also, base_url is now not passed into event structure.
Splitting bot_lib.py file into 2 files led to unnecessary
redirection of the code workflow. For an embedded bot/service to
send a reply, it was being redirected 3 times.
First, the code flow comes to "EmbeddedBotHandler" class to send
reply, then it goes to the common function in "zulip_bots/lib.py",
then it would come back to "EmbeddedBotHandler". Later on, if we
create an abstract class, from where the bot work flow would
directly hit and then from there it is classified into
EmbeddedBotHandler or ExternalBotHandler and accordingly it would
get redirected.
Now, first the bot flow goes to it's handler class External or
Embedded (where we pass that this is External or Embedded bot as
parameter) and then goes to a common point and then comes back to
the same class.
This is required, since we just reorganized the python-zulip-api
repository into 3 packages.
A nice side effect is that we get to eliminate some now-unnecessary
code for editing sys.path.
Umair Khan
Vishnu Ks
Rishi Gupta
Shreyansh Dwivedi
Tim Abbott
Eeshan Garg
Steve Howell
derAnfaenger
rht
Greg Price
neiljp (Neil Pilgrim)
Abhijeet Kaur
Elliott Jin
vaibhav