This commit renames the realm-level setting
'signup_notifications_stream' to 'signup_announcements_stream'.
The new name reflects better what the setting does.
This commit renames the realm-level setting 'notifications_stream'
to 'new_stream_announcements_stream'.
The new name reflects better what the setting does.
5c96f94206 mistakenly appended, rather than prepended, the edit to
the history. This caused AssertionErrors when attempting to view the
history of moved messages, which check that the `last_edit_time`
matches the timestamp of the first edit in the list.
Fix the ordering, and update the `edit_history` for messages that were
affected. We limit to only messages edited since the commit was
merged, since that helps bound the affected messages somewhat.
RemoteRealm customer takes precedence over RemoteServer
in general. But if an inactive plan is associated with
RemoteRealm and an active plan with RemoteServer, the
ACTIVE plan takes precendence.
Co-authored-by: Prakhar Pratyush <prakhar@zulip.com>
Previously, in DM disabled org messaging to bot was not working when
starting new conversation and adding bot as recipient because of not
updating on recipient change. And secondly, self messaging was not
allowed.
This commit ensures that the DM to bot and self are allowed irrespective
of dm restrictions.
tests: Verify DMs adhere to DM restriction policy.
Fixes#28412
Signed-off-by: sayyedarib <sayyedaribhussain4321@gmail.com>
The widening of the time between when a process is marked for
reload (at Tornado startup) and when it sends reload events makes it
unlikely-to-impossible that a single `/` request will span both of
them, and thus hit the WebReloadClientError corner case.
Remove it, as it is not worth the complication. The bad behaviour it
is attempting to prevent (of a reload right after opening `/`) was
always still possible -- if the `/` request completed right before
Tornado restarted -- so it is not clear that it was ever worth the
complication.
Collapsing was done incorrectly, as 65c400e06d added `zulip_version`
and `zulip_feature_level`, but did not update the virtual event logic
to copy those new values into the virtual event.
However, it is unlikely that a server will be upgraded multiple times
in quick enough succession for this to ever be relevant. Remove the
logic, which is additional complication for little or no gain.
Commit bd6471f0e3 (#28691) added this
reference to the old name, even though it had already been renamed in
commit b220d29fed (#17775), presumably
because that had failed to update the OpenAPI description.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Having a non-identity `cache_transformer` is no different from running
it on every row of the query_function. Simplify understanding of the
codepath used in caching by merging the pieces of code.
Rather than pass around a list of message objects in-memory, we
instead keep the same constructed QuerySet which includes the later
propagated messages (if any), and use that same query to pick out
affected Attachment objects, rather than limiting to the set of ids.
This is not necessarily a win -- the list of message-ids *may* be very
long, and thus the query may be more concise, easier to send to
PostgreSQL, and faster for PostgreSQL to parse. However, the list of
ids is almost certainly better-indexed.
After processing the move, the QuerySet must be re-defined as a search
of ids (and possibly a very long list of such), since there is no
other way which is guaranteed to correctly single out the moved
messages. At this point, it is mostly equivalent to the list of
Message objects, and certainly takes no less memory.
Rather than use `bulk_update()` to batch-move chunks of messages, use
a single SQL query to move the messages. This is much more efficient
for large topic moves. Since the `edit_history` field is not yet
JSON (see #26496) this requires that PostgreSQL cast the current data
into `jsonb`, append the new data (also cast to `jsonb`), and then
re-cast that as text.
For single-message moves, this _increases_ the SQL query count by one,
since we have to re-query for the updated data from the database after
the bulk update. However, this is overall still a performance
improvement, which improves to 2x or 3x for larger topic moves. Below
is a table of duration in seconds to run `do_update_message` to move a
topic to a new stream, based on messages in the topic, for before and
after this change:
| Topic size | Before | After |
| ---------- | -------- | ------- |
| 1 | 0.1036 | 0.0868 |
| 2 | 0.1108 | 0.0925 |
| 5 | 0.1139 | 0.0959 |
| 10 | 0.1218 | 0.0972 |
| 20 | 0.1310 | 0.1098 |
| 50 | 0.1759 | 0.1366 |
| 100 | 0.2307 | 0.1662 |
| 200 | 0.3880 | 0.2229 |
| 500 | 0.7676 | 0.4052 |
| 1000 | 1.3990 | 0.6848 |
| 2000 | 2.9706 | 1.3370 |
| 5000 | 7.5218 | 3.2882 |
| 10000 | 14.0272 | 5.4434 |
This applies access restrictions in SQL, so that individual messages
do not need to be walked one-by-one. It only functions for stream
messages.
Use of this method significantly speeds up checks if we moved "all
visible messages" in a topic, since we no longer need to walk every
remaining message in the old topic to determine that at least one was
visible to the user. Similarly, it significantly speeds up merging
into existing topics, since it no longer must walk every message in
the new topic to determine if the user could see at least one.
Finally, it unlocks the ability to bulk-update only messages the user
has access to, in a single query (see subsequent commit).
This is a preparatory commit that refactors the check_update_message
method to extract the checks containing whether a user can edit the
message or not into a separate method -validate_message_content_edit,
so that it can be re used later.
This logic was apparently missed when we implemented private streams
with shared history; the correct check is to look at whether the user
can access message history in the stream, which used to be equivalent
to whether it's a private stream.
The problem was that earlier this was just an uncaught JsonableError,
leading to a full traceback getting spammed to the admins.
The prior commit introduced a clear .code for this error on the bouncer
side, meaning the self-hosted server can now detect that and handle it
nicely, by just logging.error about it and also take the opportunity to
adjust the realm.push_notifications_... flags.
Prakhar Pratyush
Alex Vandiver
Mateusz Mandera
Tim Abbott
Anders Kaseorg
Alya Abbott
sayyedarib
Karl Stolley
Lauryn Menard
roanster007
David Rosa
shashank-23002