By default all Stripe API amounts are in the currency's smallest unit.
It's upto us to convert it to a bigger unit and show it to the end user.
And refund event used to show the currency in the smallest unit which makes
the output wrong when it comes to most currencies like USD, Europ, INR etc
which uses a bigger unit(eg Dollar instead of Cents) as the standard.
Update the New Relic webhook and tests to match the format specified
in the New Relic documentation. The new format sends a json body
instead of using url parameters. The old format is no longer supported
by New Relic according to their support staff; as a result, the fixtures for
the old test cases were removed. Added fixtures for new test cases.
Fixes: #16393.
Sentry allows adding simple webhooks without going through the process
of creating an Internal Integration in Sentry's Integration
Platform[1] (which our docs recommend).
The payload from sent from such a (simple) webhook integration is
slightly different from the payload sent by an Internal Integration
webhook. This commit tries to wrangle this payload into a form that is
usable by our webhook handler to send a notification message.
[1]: https://sentry.io/integration-platform/
Even before GDPR changes, it was strange that we displayed
users differently for fork events vs. all other events.
After GDPR, we don't even get the `username` field any
more.
So now we simply use `display_name` if available, and then
we try `nickname`.
See https://developer.atlassian.com/cloud/bitbucket/bitbucket-api-changes-gdpr/
for more context.
We were trying to share the same format string between
the two different versions of bitbucket, but this only
creates confusion, as the two versions are only close
enough to be confusing.
The format string might be the same, but the semantics
are different, as well as the eventual outputs.
For example, the {username} piece here is simple in version
2, but in version 3 we append a url to the user's name.
Previously, the GitLab webhook code, namely the `get_objects_assignee`
method first tried to get a single assignee and if that failed then it
looks for multiple assignees and then it would return the first
assignee that it found (there's actually a code smell here - a loop
which would always return on the first iteration).
Instead, this commit will change that behavior to first check for
multiple assignees first then for a single assignee if we can't find
multiple assignees. Ultimately it will return a list of all of the
assignees (however many that might be [0, n]). This method has then
aptly been renamed to `get_assignees`.
Finally, we tweked the code using this method to always use it's
output as an "assignees" parameter to templates (there's also an
assignee parameter which we want to avoid here for consistency).
Signed-off-by: Hemanth V. Alluri <hdrive1999@gmail.com>
For some reasons, some of the fixtures had the +x bit set, while
some didn't. What this commit does is make sure that no fixture
is marked as "executable" (for anyone).
Signed-off-by: Hemanth V. Alluri <hdrive1999@gmail.com>
This clears it out of the data sent to Sentry, where it is duplicative
with the indexed metadata -- and potentially exposes PHI if Sentry's
"make this issue public" feature is used.
Any exception is an "unexpected event", which means talking about
having an "unexpected event logger" or "unexpected event exception" is
confusing. As the error message in `exceptions.py` already explains,
this is about an _unsupported_ event type.
This also switches the path that these exceptions are written to,
accordingly.
8e10ab282a moved UnexpectedWebhookEventType into
`zerver.lib.exceptions`, but left the import into
`zserver.lib.webhooks.common` so that webhooks could continue to
import the exception from there.
This clutters things and adds complexity; there is no compelling
reason that the exception's source of truth should not move alongside
all other exceptions.
If there are unsupported keys, we still log an error,
but we now also send a message to the stream. (This
is a good tradeoff for the github webhook, since users
can just turn off notifications if they find it spammy.
Also, we intend to support "repository" soon.)
This is a bit of an experiment to see how this plays
in the field:
* will customers notice the change?
* will Sentry reports look any different?
The main thing fixed here is that we weren't turning
on our keys into a list. And then I refined the message
a bit more, including sorting the keys.
I also avoid the unnecessary "else".
The EVENT_FUNCTION_MAPPER maps a string event name
to a function handler. Before this we circumvented
mypy checks with a call to get_body_function_based_on_type,
which specified Any as the type of our event function.
Now the types are rigorous.
This change was impossible without the recent commit
to introduce the Helper class.
The Helper class will soon grow, but the immediate
problem it solves is the need to jankily inspect
the parameters of our get_*_body function.
Most of the changes were handled by an ad hoc
munge.py script.
The substantive changes were adding the Helper
class and passing it in.
And then the linter discovered a place where
the optional include_title parameter wasn't used
(which is one of the reasons to avoid the janky
inspect-signature technique).
As a side note, none of the include_title parameters
needed a default value of False, as we always passed
in an explicit value.
We test cover both sides of include_title, which
you can verify by hard coding it to either True or
False (and seeing the relevant failures), although I
suspect most individual codepaths
only test one value, based on whether "topic" is in
the fixture or not.
Finally, I know Helper is not a great name, but I
intend to evolve the class a bit before deciding
whether a more descriptive name is helpful here.
(For example, an upcoming commit will add a
log_unexpected helper method.)
We get the header_event one level up the call
stack now, too.
It's somewhat annoying that we have our own
concept of "event" here, instead of just returning
our event handlers directly, or just calling them
directly, but it's a bit non-trivial to fix that
right away.
In passing, I remove the strange OR for "ping",
which is already a key in EVENT_FUNCTION_MAPPER.
See https://github.com/zulip/zulip/issues/16258 for
possible follow up here.
We now ignore the following two new pull_request
actions (as well as the three existing ones
from before):
approved
converted_to_draft
As the issue above indicates, we may want to actually
support "approved" if we can find somebody to work
on the webhook. (And then the issue goes a little
broader than what changed here.)
We consolidate the tests and remove the fixtures, which
just have a lot of noisy fields that we ignore. Also,
pull_request__request_review_removed was named improperly.
Our isort configuration was almost Black-compatible, but we were
missing ensure_newline_before_comments.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Rather than catching, checking action type, and possibly re-raising,
instead return None explicitly from `get_subject_and_body`, which
already signals for a blank success result. This collocates the logic
of the action types in one place, and removes the complexity of the
re-raise.
Sentry may get reported multiple exceptions stacks, in the case where
a `raise ...` was caught, and a new exception was `raise`d. In this
case, the `filename` is the most recent exception -- but the
exceptions are stored in the `exception` key in the order in which
they occurred. As such, taking the first value with a `stacktrace`
will result in showing the wrong line, or in no stack trace being
resolved at all.
Look from the last `exception` backwards, for matching stacks.
Max Zawisa
Puneeth Chaganti
Vishnu KS
Anders Kaseorg
Steve Howell
Hemanth V. Alluri
Alex Vandiver