Previously, we checked for the `enable_offline_email_notifications` and
`enable_offline_push_notifications` settings (which determine whether the
user will receive notifications for PMs and mentions) just before sending
notifications. This has a few problem:
1. We do not have access to all the user settings in the notification
handlers (`handle_missedmessage_emails` and `handle_push_notifications`),
and therefore, we cannot correctly determine whether the notification should
be sent. Checks like the following which existed previously, will, for
example, incorrectly not send notifications even when stream email
notifications are enabled-
```
if not receives_offline_email_notifications(user_profile):
return
```
With this commit, we simply do not enqueue notifications if the "offline"
settings are disabled, which fixes that bug.
Additionally, this also fixes a bug with the "online push notifications"
feature, which was, if someone were to:
* turn off notifications for PMs and mentions (`enable_offline_push_notifications`)
* turn on stream push notifications (`enable_stream_push_notifications`)
* turn on "online push" (`enable_online_push_notifications`)
then, they would still receive notifications for PMs when online.
This isn't how the "online push enabled" feature is supposed to work;
it should only act as a wrapper around the other notification settings.
The buggy code was this in `handle_push_notifications`:
```
if not (
receives_offline_push_notifications(user_profile)
or receives_online_push_notifications(user_profile)
):
return
// send notifications
```
This commit removes that code, and extends our `notification_data.py` logic
to cover this case, along with tests.
2. The name for these settings is slightly misleading. They essentially
talk about "what to send notifications for" (PMs and mentions), and not
"when to send notifications" (offline). This commit improves this condition
by restricting the use of this term only to the database field, and using
clearer names everywhere else. This distinction will be important to have
non-confusing code when we implement multiple options for notifications
in the future as dropdown (never/when offline/when offline or online, etc).
3. We should ideally re-check all notification settings just before the
notifications are sent. This is especially important for email notifications,
which may be sent after a long time after the message was sent. We will
in the future add code to thoroughly re-check settings before sending
notifications in a clean manner, but temporarily not re-checking isn't
a terrible scenario either.
* Have the `get_active_presence_idle_user_ids` function look at all the
user data, not just `private_message` and `mentioned`.
* Fix a couple of incorrect `missedmessage_hook` tests, which did not
catch the earlier behaviour.
* Add some comments to the tests for this function for clarity.
* Add a helper to create `UserMessageNotificationsData` objects from the
user ID lists. This will later help us deduplicate code in the event_queue
logic.
This fixes a bug which earlier existed, that if a user turned on stream
notifications, and received a message in that stream which did not mention
them, they wouldn't be in the `presence_idle_users` list, and hence would
never get notifications for that message.
Note that, after this commit, users might still not get notifications in
the above scenarios in some cases, because the downstream logic in the
notification queue consumers sometimes erroneously skips sending
notifications for stream messages.
This commit moves out the SoftDeactivationMessageTest out of
test_messages.py (which at the moment have mixed category of tests) into
a more logical file, test_soft_deactivation.py.
This commit moves TestMessageForIdsDisplayRecipientFetching class which
have tests regarding display_recipient filled in by MessageDict to
test_message_dict.py.
This commit moves InternalPrepTest test class to test_message_send.py
because it tests internal_send_* and internal_prep_* functions which are
used for internal message sending in zulip.
This commit moves few tests related to testing proper sending of private
messages from PrivateMessagesTest class in test_messages.py to a new class
in test_message_send.py.
This commit extracts out MessagePOSTTest class from test_messages.py
intially.
In future commits other related message sending tests will be moved from
test_messages.py to test_message_send.py.
Starting with extracting out MirroredMessageUsersTests as it is related to
mirror users than anything message-specific.
In a future commit, may extract out some tests from MessagePOSTTest as well
but still deciding on those.
For users who are unsubscribed from the new stream but are in
the old stream, we delete the UserMessage.
We send the delete_message event only to guest users,
who have completely lost asses to the moved messages, for other
users we send the normal update_message event which moves
the messages to the new unsubed stream which
otherwise would look broken to the
user without reloading to the webpage.
According to @showell:
> All the slow decorators can die. That was a failed experiment of
> mine from 2014 days. I have meaning to kill them for a couple years
> now. I wrote this with the best of intentions, but I believe it's
> now just cruft. We never made a "fast" mode, for one. And we kept
> writing more and more slow tests, haha.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This commit is first of few commita which aim to change all the
bugdown references to markdown. This commits rename the files,
file path mentions and change the imports.
Variables and other references to bugdown will be renamed in susequent
commits.
Fixes#14498.
When a topic is moved to a different stream, the message may no
longer be reachable to guest user, if the user is not subscribed
to the new stream.
We used to send message update event to the client in these cases,
which seems to be confusing both to the client updating the message
and the server sending push_notifications for it.
Now, we delete the UserMessage entry for these messages for the
user and send a delete message event to the client; which makes
both push_notification and the event handling client think that
the message was deleted and hence no confusion in the code is
raised.
When doing query for same topic names in a stream, we should do a
case-insensitive exact match for the topic, since that's the data
model for topics in Zulip.
This is a test case verifying the current codebase produces incorrect
results. All the messages should have been edited in this case
regardless of the topic's case unless they belong to a different
stream.
Anders Kaseorg
Abhijeet Prasad Bodas
Mohit Gupta
Steve Howell
Aman Agrawal
Tim Abbott