This commit adds tests (and thus, an extra code example) for
unsubscribing another user from a particular stream by passing in
the `principals` argument to client.remove_subscriptions. The
ability to pass in `principals` was added in the latest release
of the zulip API PyPI package.
We now have a separate page for common error payloads, for example,
the payload for when the client's API key is invalid. All error
payloads that are presented on this page will be tested similarly
to our other non-error sample fixtures.
This commit adds support for passing in an argument to the macro
"call" to explicitly specify a fixture to render, like so:
{generate_code_example|doc_name|fixture(stream_message_with_args)}
api/get-all-streams - make use of the api_code_example Markdown extension's
feature of recursively extracting multiple code examples from a single
test method.
To generate a code exammple,
{generate_code_example|<api_doc_md>|example} sounds better and
more intuitive than,
{generate_code_example|<api_doc_md>|method}
The count of integrations is automatically computed now, so this will
change every time we add 10 more. Just stop asserting on the number.
Thanks to @hackerkid for spotting the issue.
This code duplicated the code in setup_realm_internal_bots, with some
added logic to avoid trying to create the same bot twice. That logic
was buggy so that it would never work at all -- it subtracted a set of
UserProfile objects from a set of email strings -- so it looked like
the command might blow up when run after the users already existed.
In fact, the buggy logic wasn't necessary, because the work the
command does after it is idempotent -- in particular `create_users`,
within its subroutine `bulk_create_users`, already filters out users
that already exist. So just cut the buggy stuff out, deduplicate the
rest with `setup_realm_internal_bots`, and document that invariant on
the latter.
While we're here, in the common case bail early without doing any
per-realm work in Python, since we're running this on every upgrade.
Users having only account in one realm will not be distracted by realm
name in subject lines of every email. Users who have multiple
accounts in realms can turn this setting on and receive a
corresponding realm name in email's subject.
Tweaked by tabbott to rebase and address a few small issues.
Fixes#5489.
For messages where the entire rendered body is a message_inline_image
object, we actually don't display any text and just display the
image. These messages may have links to images which might or might
not be internal to Zulip but in both cases there is a chance of this
links being broken when accessed by an email server like Gmail that
doesn't possess the recipient user's cookies.
We don't want to have ugly looking broken images displayed in email
notifications. So we patch this by inserting a replacement for the
`message_inline_image` block in which we essentially replace the
content with the textual link.
Edited for clarity by tabbott.
This is easy to do, and prevents this feature from getting a server
admin stuck in potentially a pretty uncomfortable way -- unable to
roll back a deploy.
This reverts commit acebd3a5e, as well as a subsequent fixup commit
0975bebac "quick fix: Fix migrations to be linear."
These changes need more work and thought before they're ready to
deploy on any large established Zulip server, such as zulipchat.com.
See discussion on #6534.
In place of the removed migration, leave behind a placeholder so
`manage.py migrate` doesn't get confused on installs where it was
already applied.
This is to break the bigger functions into smaller
ones and hence, makes unit testing easier.
Also includes renaming the stream's topic name to 'from slack'.
This will let us defer configuring outbound email to the end of the
install procedure, so we can greatly simplify it by consolidating
several scripted steps.
The new flow could be simplified further by giving the user the full
form in the first place, rather than first a form for just their
email address and then a form with the other details. We'll leave
that improvement for a separate change.
Now, there's just one spot at the beginning of the function where we
inspect the string key the user gave us; and after that point, we not
only have validated that string but in fact are working from our own
record that it pointed to, not the string itself.
This simplifies the code a bit, e.g. by not repeatedly searching the
database for the key (and hoping everything agrees so that we keep
getting the same row), and it will simplify adding logic to inspect
row attributes like `presume_email_valid`.
There's no use case for presenting a key that's invalid; if we haven't
given the user a valid key, we needn't send them to a URL that
presents an invalid one. And the code is simpler to think about if
the only keys that can exist (after the validation at the top of the
function) are valid ones.
Apart from the case where creation_key is None, but invalid, and
settings.OPEN_REALM_CREATION is True so that we'd previously let the
invalid key slide, this is a pure refactor.
This fixes an issue where the user's own avatar was being sent down
the wire as None. We could have fixed it, as in #8265, by adding code
in the webapp and mobile apps to compute medium-size gravatar URLs as
well, but that would be messy, and there's little benefit to that
complexity (saving at most 2 URLs from the payload).
Fixes#8253.
This commit uses the Markdown extension defined in
zerver/lib/bugdown/api_generate_examples to generate the
example fixture and code example, so that both are tested
in zerver/lib/api_test_helpers.
This commit uses the Markdown extension defined in
zerver/lib/bugdown/api_generate_examples to generate the
example fixture and code example, so that both are tested
in zerver/lib/api_test_helpers.
Some of our code examples can only be run with administrator
credentials (such as create-user). Thus, the Markdown extension
for generating code examples should have an option to include
the lines that recommend using an admin zuliprc instead of a
non-admin one.
This commit uses the Markdown extension defined in
zerver/lib/bugdown/api_generate_examples to generate the
example fixture and code example, so that both are tested
in zerver/lib/api_test_helpers.
This commit uses the Markdown extension defined in
zerver/lib/bugdown/api_generate_examples to generate the
example fixture and code example, so that both are tested
in tools/lib/api_tests.
This commit uses the Markdown extension defined in
zerver/lib/bugdown/api_generate_examples to generate the
example fixture and code example, so that both are tested
in tools/lib/api_tests.
This commit uses the Markdown extension defined in
zerver/lib/bugdown/api_generate_examples to generate the
example fixture and code example, so that both are tested in
tools/lib/api_tests.
This commit uses the Markdown extension defined in
zerver/lib/bugdown/api_generate_examples to generate the example
fixture and code example, so that both are tested in
tools/lib/api_tests.
This commit uses the Markdown extension defined in
zerver/lib/bugdown/api_generate_examples to generate the example
fixture and code example, so that both are tested in
tools/lib/api_tests.
Now that the Markdown extension defined in
zerver/lib/bugdown/api_generate_examples depended on code in the
tools/lib/* directory, it caused the production tests to fail since
the tools/ directory wouldn't exist in a production environment.
This commit uses the Markdown extension defined in
zerver/lib/bugdown/api_generate_example to generate the example
fixture and code example, so that both are tested in
tools/lib/api_tests.
This commit adds a Markdown extension that allows the following
syntax,
{generate_code_example|<md_file_name>|<fixture or method>}
to generate code examples and fixtures found in tools/lib/api_tests.py
and templates/zerver/api/fixtures.json, respectively.
If an exception was thrown inside `send_email` resulting in a retry,
we would include the `failed_tries` data in the event, which turned
out to thrown an exception itself.
This fixes that flow, including deepening the test so that it would
fail if we didn't have the new logic.
We'll replace this primarily with per-realm quotas (plus the simple
per-file limit of settings.MAX_FILE_UPLOAD_SIZE, 25 MiB by default).
We do want per-user quotas too, but they'll need some more management
apparatus around them so an admin has a practical way to set them
differently for different users. And the error handling in this
existing code is rather confused. Just clear this feature out
entirely for now; then we'll build the per-realm version more cleanly,
and then we can later add back per-realm quotas modelled after that.
The migration to actually remove the field is in a subsequent commit.
Based in part on work by Vishnu Ks (hackerkid).
This is a little cleaner in that the try/except blocks for
SMTPException are a lot narrower; and it'll facilitate an upcoming
change to sometimes skip sending mail.
In this commit we also fix a test which would fail as a result of
doing this cleanup since the test wasn't designed to take into
account the space chars which might occur in the beginning of a
html line.
In the email integration, previously, EMAIL_GATEWAY_EXAMPLE wasn't
rendered at all, which was recently fixed. So, now, we should make
sure that it gets rendered!
In order to get test coverage on topic name checks, we
do them in Addressee, so that we don't hit an assertion
first. The assertion in question is in Addressee.topic(),
and it was added partly to appease mypy.
Eeshan Garg
Rhea Parekh
Greg Price
Josh Mandel
Ricky
Aditya Bansal
Robert Hönig
Roman Godov
Shubham Dhama
Brock Whittaker
Tim Abbott
rht
Privisus
Umair Khan
Vishnu Ks
Rohitt Vashishtha
YJDave
Dennis Ludl
Patrick Grave
Abijith10