This fixes the bug that message was undefined since we used to store
locally echoed message id and were not updating it after new message
id for the same message was received from the server.
We remove all trace of the old topic and reprocess all the new
messages in old and new topics.
process_topic_edit function was moved since it needs to be below
get_topic_row function.
We reuse the existing logic for displaying and updating stream color
from the stream left sidebar.
Tests fixtures were extracted and updated for this commit.
The approach that supposed to use this data was not implemented
and hence this data will no longer be used.
If this feature is implemented in future,
this data will still not be used since we would depend upon
starred_messages.js library to provide us the required information.
* Add action to mute topics.
* We don't need to store muted data per topic as previously planned.
* Moved launch topic test to the top so that they run on non-modified
data.
* Show an empty overlay of recent topics.
* Register click event to open recent topics.
* Launch recent topics on "t" keypress.
This is based on the draft overlay.
This is part of a refactor that aimed to remove /json/users calls,
as we can get all the information needed on people API.
Now, the list render for $users_table and $deactivated_users_table
uses user_ids instead of user objects, as the people API give us
a filtered list of active_user_ids and non_active_user_ids.
The populate_users function doesn't need to sort the list of
active and non-active users, because the list_render is called
specifying to sort users by their full_name.
Author: Clara Moraes Dantas <clara.moraesd@gmail.com>
As part of a refactoring, we are now able to remove the
/json/users calls and get all the information needed on people.js.
To do this, now the populate_users uses the people api to get
all the active and non active human users.
This is part of a refactoring aimed to eliminate /json/users calls,
as we can have all the information needed on people.js.
Now, human_info() will call is_person_active() because the person
object it will receive won't have is_active field anymore, as
we'll use the people api to get a set of filtered active/non active
users.
Author: Clara Moraes Dantas <clara.moraesd@gmail.com>
This implementation overrides some of PSA's internal backend
functions to handle `state` value with redis as the standard
way doesn't work because of apple sending required details
in the form of POST request.
Includes a mixin test class that'll be useful for testing
Native auth flow.
Thanks to Mateusz Mandera for the idea of using redis and
other important work on this.
Documentation rewritten by tabbott.
Co-authored-by: Mateusz Mandera <mateusz.mandera@zulip.com>
This commit adds an integration for Thinkst Canaries - physical, VM and
cloud-based canaries for detecting attackers to a network. Thinkst
Canaries can send webhook alerts when canaries have been tripped, and
this integration will post Zulip messages when these webhooks are
received.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
This commit aligns the search icon in the navbar (with the search bar
closed) to be in the same position as the "search_exit" or "x" icon
(which appears when the search bar is open).
Commit c4e59309e4 introduced a
regression that caused a small part of the navbar in night mode to not
have the correct background color.
The relevant changes in that commit intended to fix the margin for the
search box for when the search pills feature was set to active.
This commit slightly increases the padding for the search box (when
pills are active), to improve pill alignment, and adds styles for
"#searchbox_legacy" to correct the background when search pills are
disabled.
This also reverts the change from commit
29b8e11e20 which tried to improve the
alignment of pills by adding a margin left but didn't address the
background color issue.
This was previously hardcoded with agreement between the Zulip backend
and frontend as 86400 seconds (1 day). Now, it's still hardcoded in
the backend, but arranged in a way where we could add a setting
without any changes to the mobile and terminal apps to update logic.
Fixes#15278.
I don't believe it's actually been possible for this to be shown in
Zulip in several years; and we just made it more obviously so
(resulting in a linter error).
We now trigger realm day/night logo upload by clicking on realm
day/night logo element itself rather than having a big upload button
and to match our user avatar UI. Added new spinner over the logo
element itself to show while uploading realm logo for both day and
night logos.
Display logo at full width regardless of the size of the image to
reduce the dependency on the logo image in determining the logo
container size. This also fixes a problem owhere the night/day logos
would lose their default-dark/white background color when we upload an
image in jpg format rather than png.
Change user avatar spinner implementation to match
realm icon spinner implementation and have common css class
since similar implementation between similar widgets may help
in future deduplication.
The orig_initial_pointer variable was part of the implementation for
ensuring server-initiated reloads preserve the user's selected message
and scroll position (so that they are not disruptive). Previously,
the logic did some unnecessary contortions to ensure the two goals:
* The `pointer.js` logic knows what the server thinks the pointer is.
* The `message_fetch.js` logic knows what anchor to use to center it's
home view fetch.
It's a lot cleaner to do this by not mutating page_params.pointer.
In the past, the anchor message has always been the same as the
pointer, but we're about to change that as part of removing the
pointer entirely.
Using the anchor is logically what we meant, anyway, since we always
want to select a message that's actually within the range we just
fetched.
This was implemented in 2012 to avoid showing a loading indicator for
fetching messages for users with no message history. However, the
Zulip onboarding UI always creates some message history, and fetching
history is fast, so this is likely clutter more than a useful
optimization.
We're migrating to using the cleaner zulip.com domain, which involves
changing all of our links from ReadTheDocs and other places to point
to the cleaner URL.
This declaration already exists in the default CSS.
This declaration was present when the edit history modal was first
given a night mode (then called "dark mode") style in November 2017 in
4f81bdd0a6. It also existed in the
default CSS at that time.
Previously, topic edit diffs in the edit history modal were not
highlighted in the same way as content diffs because the highlighting
CSS rules were inside a .rendered_markdown block. So they affected the
content diffs, which are classed as such, but not the topic diffs.
This commit moves the highlight rules to a
.message_edit_history_content block inside the already existing
#message-edit-history block. .message_edit_history_content had
already existed in the edit history template message_edit_history.hbs,
and is assigned to both the content and topic diffs.
The ability to see topic edits in the edit history was added in
March 2019 in 38be5ea74394d2fd8586038de6ac447b4bbfbf67; the
highlighting worked at that time. It broke four mounths later in July
2019 in 38ffde37e5 when the highlight
rules were moved into a .rendered_markdown block after having been
global.
(As a further aside, .rendered_markdown was only added to the content
diffs in April 2019 in 5c36918c17.
.message_edit_history_content had been first added, to the content
diffs, in February 2019 in 7d42d7b4dbe6eb144a148135db50ad35efc01295.)
Aside from fixing topic edit diffs, this change is just more correct;
the highlight rules don't belong under .rendered_markdown, and they
don't need to be applied globally.
Previously, the edit history modal did not respect the time format
setting (whether to show times in 12-hour or 24-hour format) when
displaying message edit times (#15171).
This commit fixes that by passing the edit times to
timerender.stringify_time(), which takes that setting into account,
instead of just doing a static string formatting operation.
This bug has existed since February 2017, when the edit history UI
was first added in 1a697b6e02.
Fixes#15171.
Currently, the edit history modal does not respect the time format
setting (whether to show times in 12-hour or 24-hour format) when
displaying message edit times (#15171).
This commit refactors how fetch_and_render_message_history() handles
times in order to make fixing that issue in a reasonable way easier.
It will be fixed in a following commit.
Previously, the show_date_row flag for the first entry in the edit
history modal was directly set to `true`, while in all other entries
it was calculated with identical code. Though show_date_row for the
first entry should indeed always be true, there's no need for it to be
a special case.
In preparation for factoring out the calculation of show_date_row,
this commit nominally calculates the first entry's show_date_row with
the same code that is used to calculate show_date_row for all other
entries. Nominally, because it will still always end up being true.
Previously, the logic for when to add a date row to an edit history
entry was checking against the date of the original message (which is
always the first entry in the message history), not the date of the
previous edit. This caused every edit not made on the date of the
original message to show a date row, even if it wasn't the first edit
on that date.
This commit fixes that bug by updating prev_timestamp after processing
each message history entry, whereas before it was only updated after
processing the first one — the original message.
This bug has existed since June 2017, when
84e5fe733c changed how date rows worked;
from only showing one at the top labeled "Earliest" to each entry
having a possibilty of showing one.
Previously it was impossible for a topic-only edit to show a date row
in any circumstance; the code that handles topic-only edits didn't
even attempt to set show_date_row, the flag that determines whether a
date row should be rendered. Now a topic-only edit will show a date row
in the same circumstances as any other edit[1].
This bug has existed since March 2019, when rendering of topic-only
edits was first added in 38be5ea743.
[1] Currently, "the same circumstances as any other edit" means
there'll be a date row on the original message, and then on every edit
not made on the same date as the original message, even if it was't
the first edit on the date it was made. This is a bug that will be
fixed in a following commit. This commit is being made first since
it's fixing a lack-of-information bug, whereas the other bug is a
somewhat less important repeating-information bug.
Aman Agrawal
Aman Agrawal
Clara Dantas
Dinesh
David Wood
YashRE42
Tim Abbott
jagansivam28
Tim Abbott
majordwarf
Sharif Naas
SiddharthVarshney