Rather than use a bulk insert via Django, use the faster
`bulk_insert_all_ums` that we already have. This also adds a `ON
CONFLICT` clause, to make the insert resilient to race conditions.
There are currently two callsites, with different desired `ON
CONFLICT` behaviours:
- For `notify_reaction_update`, if the `UserMessage` had already been
created, we would have done nothing to change it.
- For `do_update_message_flags`, we would have ensured a specific bit
was (un)set.
Extend `create_historical_user_messages` and `bulk_insert_all_ums` to
support `ON CONFLICT (...) UPDATE SET flags = ...`.
Replaced HUDDLE attribute with DIRECT_MESSAGE_GROUP using VS Code search,
part of a general renaming of the object class.
Fixes part of #28640.
Co-authored-by: JohnLu2004 <JohnLu10212004@gmail.com>
This commit adds a management command that will run regularly
as a cron job to send zulip updates to realms based on their
current and latest zulip_update_announcements_level.
For realms with:
* level = None: Send a group DM to admins notifying them about
this new feature & suggestion to set the stream accordingly.
* level = 0:
* If stream is still not configured, wait for a week
before setting their level to latest level. They will
miss updates until their configure the stream.
* If stream is configured, send updates.
* level > 0: Send one message/update per level & increase
the level by 1 till the latest level.
Fixes#28604.
This is a prep commit to extract out the logic to
create message from 'internal_send_huddle_message'
into a separate function 'internal_prep_huddle_message'.
We will use this new function to get the huddle message
without sending it immediately.
In general, we never want to use savepoints.
This prep commit adds savepoint=False in do_send_messages
as we don't want to just rollback to this savepoint and
proceed if we encounter any error while sending zulip updates
via cron.
A user who was no longer subscribed to a private stream kept their
UserMessage row for a message sent while they were in it; this is
expected. However, they _also_ kept that row even if the message was
moved to a different private stream that they were also not subscribed
to. This violates the invariant that users without subscriptions
never have UserMessage rows.
This `if new_stream is not None` block was improperly indented,
causing it to only run if the propagation mode was not `change_one`.
Since the block controlled creation and deletion of UserMessage rows,
this led to messages being improperly still visible to members of the
old stream if they were being moved from public to private streams.
Clients also failed to receive `delete_message` events, so the
messages remained visible in their feeds until they reloaded the
application.
Only affects zulipchat, by being based on the BILLING_ENABLED setting.
The restricted backends in this commit are
- AzureAD - restricted to Standard plan
- SAML - restricted to Plus plan, although it was already practically
restricted due to requiring server-side configuration to be done by us
This restriction is placed upon **enabling** a backend - so
organizations that already have a backend enabled, will continue to be
able to use it. This allows us to make exceptions and enable a backend
for an org manually via the shell, and to grandfather organizations into
keeping the backend they have been relying on.
This commit adds a realm-level setting named
'zulip_update_announcements_stream' that configures the
stream to which zulip updates should be posted.
Fixes part of #28604.
This commit renames the realm-level setting
'signup_notifications_stream' to 'signup_announcements_stream'.
The new name reflects better what the setting does.
This commit renames the realm-level setting 'notifications_stream'
to 'new_stream_announcements_stream'.
The new name reflects better what the setting does.
Previously, in DM disabled org messaging to bot was not working when
starting new conversation and adding bot as recipient because of not
updating on recipient change. And secondly, self messaging was not
allowed.
This commit ensures that the DM to bot and self are allowed irrespective
of dm restrictions.
tests: Verify DMs adhere to DM restriction policy.
Fixes#28412
Signed-off-by: sayyedarib <sayyedaribhussain4321@gmail.com>
Rather than pass around a list of message objects in-memory, we
instead keep the same constructed QuerySet which includes the later
propagated messages (if any), and use that same query to pick out
affected Attachment objects, rather than limiting to the set of ids.
This is not necessarily a win -- the list of message-ids *may* be very
long, and thus the query may be more concise, easier to send to
PostgreSQL, and faster for PostgreSQL to parse. However, the list of
ids is almost certainly better-indexed.
After processing the move, the QuerySet must be re-defined as a search
of ids (and possibly a very long list of such), since there is no
other way which is guaranteed to correctly single out the moved
messages. At this point, it is mostly equivalent to the list of
Message objects, and certainly takes no less memory.
This applies access restrictions in SQL, so that individual messages
do not need to be walked one-by-one. It only functions for stream
messages.
Use of this method significantly speeds up checks if we moved "all
visible messages" in a topic, since we no longer need to walk every
remaining message in the old topic to determine that at least one was
visible to the user. Similarly, it significantly speeds up merging
into existing topics, since it no longer must walk every message in
the new topic to determine if the user could see at least one.
Finally, it unlocks the ability to bulk-update only messages the user
has access to, in a single query (see subsequent commit).
This is a preparatory commit that refactors the check_update_message
method to extract the checks containing whether a user can edit the
message or not into a separate method -validate_message_content_edit,
so that it can be re used later.
This logic was apparently missed when we implemented private streams
with shared history; the correct check is to look at whether the user
can access message history in the stream, which used to be equivalent
to whether it's a private stream.
This commit removes the stale 'email_gateway' parameter
from 'do_send_messages' function.
This should have been removed in 6c473ed75f,
when the call to 'build_message_send_dict' was removed
from 'do_send_messages'.
The endpoint was lacking validation that the authentication_methods dict
submitted by the user made sense. So e.g. it allowed submitting a
nonsense key like NoSuchBackend or modifying the realm's configured
authentication methods for a backend that's not enabled on the server,
which should not be allowed.
Both were ultimately harmless, because:
1. Submitting NoSuchBackend would luckily just trigger a KeyError inside
the transaction.atomic() block in do_set_realm_authentication_methods
so it would actually roll back the database changes it was trying to
make. So this couldn't actually create some weird
RealmAuthenticationMethod entries.
2. Silently enabling or disabling e.g. GitHub for a realm when GitHub
isn't enabled on the server doesn't really change anything. And this
action is only available to the realm's admins to begin with, so
there's no attack vector here.
test_supported_backends_only_updated wasn't actually testing anything,
because the state it was asserting:
```
self.assertFalse(github_auth_enabled(realm))
self.assertTrue(dev_auth_enabled(realm))
self.assertFalse(password_auth_enabled(realm))
```
matched the desired state submitted to the API...
```
result = self.client_patch(
"/json/realm",
{
"authentication_methods": orjson.dumps(
{"Email": False, "Dev": True, "GitHub": False}
).decode()
},
)
```
so we just replace it with a new test that tests the param validation.
This leads to significant speedups. In a test, with 100 random unique
event classes, the old code processed a batch of 100 rows (on average
66-ish unique in the batch) in 0.45 seconds. Doing this in a single
query processes the same batch in 0.0076 seconds.
This is preparatory work towards adding a Topic model.
We plan to use the local variable name as 'topic' for
the Topic model objects.
Currently, we use *topic as the local variable name for
topic names.
We rename local variables of the form *topic to *topic_name
so that we don't need to think about type collisions in
individual code paths where we might want to talk about both
Topic objects and strings for the topic name.
Rename and restructure these comparison variables such that we don't
have a possibly impossible case for presence.last_connected_time being
None.
Fixes#25498.
Aman Agrawal
Alex Vandiver
John Lu
Vector73
Anders Kaseorg
Prakhar Pratyush
Mateusz Mandera
sayyedarib
Tim Abbott
roanster007
shashank-23002