exempt_from_license_number_check was initially added allowing
organizations with it enabled to invite new users above their number of
licenses.
However, an organization with this permission enabled,
cannot upgrade if they weren't on a plan already - because when choosing
Manual license management, you cannot enter a number of licenses lower
than the current seat count. However, an organization like that probably
already has some users that they get free of charge - and thus they need
to be able to enter a lower number of licenses in order to upgrade.
Updates the message sent by the notification bot when an
organization is approved for full sponsorship on Zulip
Cloud Standard to include a request to list and link to
Zulip on any acknowledgement or sponsorship pages.
Adds the count of users with the role of guest to the stats view
`page_params` via a database query. This information is then added
to the summary statistics section of the analytics page after being
formatted by `stats.js`.
Creates Bassanio as a guest user in the database for the analytics
realm.
Fixes#20162.
Our seat count calculation is different for guest user than normal users
(a number of initial guests are free, and additional marginal guests are
worth 1/5 of a seat) - so these checks we apply when a user is being
invited or signing up need to know whether it's a guest or non-guest
being added.
This is a simple generalization of get_latest_seat_count and is useful
for calculating "what will be the realm's license count if this
number of (guest) users is added?" without duplicating any of the math
logic. Will be used in the next commits.
Our billing FAQ says:
"For an organization with N other users, 5*N guest users are included at
no extra charge. After that, you will be charged at 1/5 of your regular
per-user pricing for each additional guest.".
It wasn't quite intuitive to me that
max(non_guests, math.ceil(guests / 5)) achieves that pricing, so it's
worth mentioning in a comment that it does and that that's why that
formula is used.
`extra_data` as a `TextField` expects a `str`, but we had been passing
`dict` instead. This is a temporary solution before #18391 to fix the
type annotation.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
When being called, the wrapped function is passed `PaymentIntent`
(the `content_object` of `Event`). With that, since `customer` can be
`None`, an assertion is also required.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Now that we pass in the UserProfile.id in the metadata to Stripe's
PaymentIntent objects, we no longer need to retrieve the user via
delivery_email. It makes more sense to just fetch the user by ID
and then get the latest delivery_email directly.
Note that an update to Stripe's fixtures is not necessary here
since a previous commit already modified the metadata passed to
both stripe.Session/PaymentIntent objects.
Previously, our Stripe webhook event handler code retrieved the
user's email from Stripe using the stripe.Customer.email attribute.
This led to situations such that whenever the email that Stripe had
did not correspond to a UserProfile in Zulip, the payment flow
failed since we couldn't find a UserProfile associated with the
given email.
Now, we pass in the UserProfile.id in the metadata to Stripe's
checkout Session object, so that we can fetch the correct email
in future Stripe requests.
It is confusing to have the plan type constants not be namespaced
by the thing they represent. We already have a namespacing
convention in place for constants, so we should use it for
Realm.plan_type as well.
compute_plan_parameters assumed that the value of
tier is always CustomerPlan.STANDARD. We change that behavior
to make the function handle CustomerPlan.PLUS as well.
This upgrades the Stripe API to the most recent version. Going through
the Git history, it looks like our current API version is at 2019-03-14.
The API version should be manually changed in Stripe dashboard at the same
time as the commit is deployed in production.
Backward incompatible changes that are relevant to our codebase between
(2019-03-14, 2020-08-27].
* 2020-08-27 - The `sources` property on Customers is no longer included by
default.
* 2020-03-02 - Nothing applicable
* 2019-12-03 - The `id` field of all invoice line items have changed and are
now prefixed
with `il_`. We only rely on this while we normalize the fixtures.
* 2019-11-05 - Nothing applicable
* 2019-10-17 - The `billing` attribute on invoices, subscriptions, and
subscription schedules is renamed to`collection_method`. The invoice
change is the one that is relevant to us.
* The customer object’s `account_balance` value has been renamed to
`balance`. Only used for the stubs at the moment.
* 2019-10-08 - Nothing applicable
* 2019-09-09 - Nothing applicable
* 2019-08-14 - Nothing applicable
* 2019-05-16 - Nothing applicable
https://stripe.com/docs/upgrades
Also normalize the following IDs in stripe fixtures
* price_[A-Za-z0-9]{24}
* prod_[A-Za-z0-9]{14}
* pi_[A-Za-z0-9]{24}
* il_[A-Za-z0-9]{24}
Previously, we only downgraded and voided small organizations behind
payments only if they had an active plan.
This left us with a bunch of invoices from small realms which used to
have an active plan. It doesn't make much sense for us to get these
realms to pay the invoices so we have decided to just void them. This
commit voids the open invoices of all the small realms without an active
plan and has the last invoice open. Unlike, the realms with an active
plan we don't email them about us voiding the invoice. It's not super
obvious whether Stripe sends an email to the customer when the Invoice
is voided. But they do get the message that the invoice is voided if
they try to pay the invoice through the hosted invoice page.
An additional check for whether customer.stripe_customer_id is
None is added to the function. That check was not really required before
since all the customers with a plan also have a valid value for
stripe_customer_id. So all the calls to stripe.Invoice.list would have
non None value for customer argument.
Even though that is the case, mypy should still have complained about
the possibility of customer.stripe_customer_id being None when passed to
stripe.Invoice.list as customer paramater since mypy don't know that
customers with a plan will always have a non empty value for
stripe_customer_id. Our stripe stubs expect a non empty value for
the customer parameter of stripe.Invoice.list. This is despite the
fact that stripe.Invoice.list can actually be called with customer set
to None. This returns the invoices from the entire organization.
Though, we still decided to ensure that the value of customer should be
non empty since there is no reason for us to ever call this function
with customer set to None. You can just call the function wuthout the
customer argument instead. So this requirement of a non None customer
paramater is useful for catching bugs.
The reason mypy didn't complain was because the type of
Customer.objects.all() is Any and not QuerySet[Customer]. So mypy has no
idea that customer.stripe_customer_id can be theoratically None even
though it was not possible in this [articular case as explained before.
I verified that this was the reason mypy didn't complain by using the
reveal_type function on Customer.objects.all() and the customer object.
After the refactoring it's super to obvious to mypy that the type of the
customer is Customer since it's mentioned in the function defintion. So it
was able to complain about the possibility of customer.stripe_customer_id
being None after the refactoring.
Mateusz Mandera
Anders Kaseorg
Lauryn Menard
Zixuan James Li
Zixuan James Li
Aman Agrawal
Eeshan Garg
Vishnu KS