It’s unclear what was supposed to be “safe” about this wrapper. The
hashlib API is fine without it, and we don’t want to encourage further
use of SHA-1.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
The previous function was poorly named, asked for a
Realm object when realm_id sufficed, and returned a
tuple of strings that had different semantics.
I also avoid calling it duplicate times in a couple
places, although it was probably rarely the case that
both invocations actually happened if upstream
validations were working.
Note that there is a TypedDict called EmojiInfo, so I
chose EmojiData here. Perhaps a better name would be
TinyEmojiData or something.
I also simplify the reaction tests with a verify
helper.
This is a follow-up to 4c8915c8e4, for
the case when the `team:read` permission is missing, which causes the
`team.info` call itself to fail. The error message supplies
information about the provided and missing permissions -- but it also
still sends the `X-OAuth-Scopes` header which we normall read, so we can
use that as normal.
So far, we've used the BitField .authentication_methods on Realm
for tracking which backends are enabled for an organization. This
however made it a pain to add new backends (requiring altering the
column and a migration - particularly troublesome if someone wanted to
create their own custom auth backend for their server).
Instead this will be tracked through the existence of the appropriate
rows in the RealmAuthenticationMethods table.
`./manage.py import` does not take a tarball; it takes a directory.
Making a separate tarball is a waste of CPU time and disk, as it is
never used.
This was included in the commit of the initial Slack conversion code
in 5b37c5562b and propagated from there into every conversion tool.
Remove the unnecessary tarball creation.
Black 23 enforces some slightly more specific rules about empty line
counts and redundant parenthesis removal, but the result is still
compatible with Black 22.
(This does not actually upgrade our Python environment to Black 23
yet.)
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
The naive solution #23465 creates situations where the same user can have
multiple reactions as the base emojis are not unique, e.g. +1::skin2
and +1::skin4 would both reduce to +1 but the userlists are separate.
This solution handles the reduction, merges the same-base reactions,
and deduplicates the userlist.
Co-authored-by: Alex Vandiver <alexmv@zulip.com>
Co-authored-by: rht <rhtbot@protonmail.com>
Previously, emoji.json was read from
"$ZULIP_PATH/node_modules/emoji-datasource-google/emoji.json".
This path doesn't exist in production when installing from scratch from
a release tarball. And so, we ensure emoji.json exists by copying it to
`static/generated/emoji`.
With tweaks to comments by tabbott.
Fixes: #23469
This commit adds the OPTIONAL .realm attribute to Message
(and ArchivedMessage), with the server changes for making new Messages
have this set. Old Messages still have to be migrated to backfill this,
before it can be non-nullable.
Appropriate test changes to correctly set .realm for Messages the tests
manually create are included here as well.
build_message has a lot of arguments, so it's hard to verify correctness
of callers that just try to get the order right. It's much clearer to be
explicit via kwargs. mattermost.py and rocketchat.py already do this, so
let's bring slack.py and gitter.py up to par.
Because Slack emoji naming is different from Zulip's.
According to https://emojipedia.org/slack/, Slack's emoji shortcodes are
derived from https://github.com/iamcal/emoji-data.
There are probably some deviations from that dataset, but this PR should
at least catch the ones that are identical to iamcal's.
If there are more than 1 room with the same set of users, the import
will fail due to a unique constraint on the huddle_hash. Figuring out
why and which room is causing this database error is kinda difficult.
We deduplicate those cases here and simply merge the rooms together.
Note however, that the deduplication does not work as expected so we
simply ignore them all together for now and only raise an exception
along some logging output. At least this way, it is pretty clear what is
wrong and you do not have to wait to get a database error during the
actual import.
We also ignore empty huddle rooms since those are the duplicates that
caused problems for me and if they are empty, ignoring them is easier
than trying to get the merge to work.
Not sure where those channels come from since we discovered this with
production data.
Signed-off-by: Florian Pritz <bluewind@xinu.at>
Not sure where those come from since we discovered this with production
data. Somehow there were reactions with usernames that were old and no
longer existed.
Signed-off-by: Florian Pritz <bluewind@xinu.at>
Not sure where those come from since we discovered this with production
data.
There only was a single instance of this in my entire batch of data in
an old message from the time when we started using Rocket.Chat. This
might be an old issue or it might require some special settings that
were later changed.
Signed-off-by: Florian Pritz <bluewind@xinu.at>
Users will only be able to login via GitHub, because imported users
get GitHub's generated noreply email addresses - so this should be the
only auth method enabled at first, to avoid confusion.
Only ["id"] is accessed on the dicts (representing the external tool
users). Given that for some tools the id may be under a different name
etc. due to different user dicts format, it's best to just pass those
ids to the function so that it can stay generalized and not reliant
on a specific user dict format.