A deprecated import shouldn’t be used even in a migration, since the
migration will need to remain runnable in the future. We never needed
a migration for this switch anyway; we just needed to edit the old
migration, since no actual state changes are involved.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This commit updates the stream creation, subscribing others to
stream, wildcard mention settings and stream post policy to allow
realm moderators even if they are new and the respective setting
is set to allow full members only.
This commit renames the is_new_member property in models.py
to is_provisional_member which will return true for any user
who is not a full member. We will add a condition in further
commit such that this returns 'False' for a moderator as we
will initially give all the rights to moderator that a full
member has.
This was inaccurate after testing the implementation, and there's an
argument that we shouldn't move it as it will simplify migrating to a
world where (some) private message threads can have topics.
These are all referring to email_gateway_bot, when they're supposed to
refer to the notification and welcome bots, respectively. The values are
the same though, so the tests were passing anyway.
Its likely that we would implement new hotspots that aren't
a part of the tutorial hotspots, in the future. For instance,
a hotspot to advertise new features. Hence, grouping them into
categories like INTRO_HOTSPOTS would be a good start. We also
have an aggregate of all types of hotspots we may add in the
future, under ALL_HOTSPOTS.
Fixes#17238.
In process_new_human user, the queries were wrong, revoking all invites
sent to the email address, even in other realms than the one where the
new account just got created.
The description of request parameter of update-subscription-settings was
wrongly pasted in yaml and wasn't completely removed from the md file.
Made appropriate fixes in yaml and md file.
test_signup: This test was wrong, because the inviter UserProfile was
from a different realm. Such a PreregistrationUser shouldn't be
considered valid.
test_tutorial: The direct call to internal_send_private_message was
using sender's realm as the realm argument which is not valid. It
doesn't lead to any error because the codepath seems to mostly not care
about the realm arg if the sender is a cross-realm bot. From my reading
of the code I think that wrong realm arg here would break user mentions,
because it makes its way to check_message() and then to
build_message_send_dict - but overall the message gets sent without
errors. Either way, this was a bug in the test and should be fixed.
Currently, the ID and Type fields didn't have a description,
and weren't being displayed. Added a schema component to add
descriptions, and display on the api page. Fixes part of #15967.
This commmit includes ROLE_MODERATOR in realm_user_count_by_role.
We also update test_change_role in test_audit_log.py to include
changes for moderator role as well.
Note that at this point, it's not possible to create moderator users;
this just will make it easier to write tests for logic involving them
as we develop the feature.
Have not included "ROLE_MODERATOR" in UserProfile.ROLE_TYPES
in this commit because did not want to update the openapi
docs at this stage as it will be a user-facing change and
not updating the openapi docs with moderator role included in
UserProfile.ROLE_TYPES gives error in ./tools/check-schemas.
The `message_id` was made an `str` object because
the request expected `Dict[str, str]`. The request is now
casted to `Dict[str, Any]` to fix the issue and removed
typecast of `message_id` to str.
python-zulip-api reference:
https://github.com/zulip/python-zulip-api/pull/653
Currently there are only tests for verifying the error case and there
are no tests to check the case where messages are sent successfully
in 'STREAM_POST_POLICY_RESTRICT_NEW_MEMBERS' stream.
This commit adds tests for checking that full members and bots owned
by them can send message successfully in streams with post policy as
'STREAM_POST_POLICY_RESTRICT_NEW_MEMBERS'.
We currently not allow new bots to send message in stream with post
policy as 'STREAM_POST_POLICY_RESTRICT_NEW_MEMBERS', but we should
allow them to send messages if their owner is a full member.
This will make it consistent with behavior in stream with post
policy as 'STREAM_POST_POLICY_ADMINS_ONLY' where we allow non admin
bots with owner as admin to send messages.
According to tests we should not allow bot without owners to
post in streams with STREAM_POST_POLICY_RESTRICT_NEW_MEMBERS.
But the code does not handle this and the related test passes
and raises error for case of bots without owner because the bot
is itself a new member.
This commit fixes this by adding a condition to check if there
is no bot owner and then raise error if there is no owner.
This is a minor refactor which renames the
notify_topic_moved_streams function to
send_message_moved_breadcrumbs.
This is done because this function will be also used
for other things in the future, when moving streams
or when using the /digress command, for example.
Added assertion to check that if a deprecated flag is in a field's
schema, then it should have deprecated mentioned in description
as well, and moved these checks to a separate function.
Fixes part of #15967.
Add new rest api endpoint GET users/{email} for looking up a user by
email, which is useful especially for corporate API applications that
might already have a user's email address.
Fixes#14302.
It looks like this ritual was born when a type comment wasn’t working
because it was mistyped without the colon.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>'
A few internal fields used for tracking which types of notifications
have already been sent for a given message, like `hander_id` and the
`push_notified` bundle of fields were being incorrectly included in
message events delivered to clients clients.
One could argue these fields might be useful hints to clients, but
because notifications can be triggered later on via
`missedmessage_hook`, they have no useful purpose in the API.
This commit move these extended event field on a `internal_data`
object within the event object, and delete this field in `contents()`
for call points that would serve data to clients.
Tweaked by tabbott to provide a cleaner interface.
We're not bumping API_FEATURE_LEVEL because these fields have always
been documented as being present only due to a bug, so no clients
should be expecting or relying on them.
Fixes: #15947.
Anders Kaseorg
shanukun
sahil839
Tim Abbott
Mateusz Mandera
Tushar Upadhyay
Sumanth V Rao
Suyash Vardhan Mathur
neiljp (Neil Pilgrim)
Alex Vandiver
LoopThrough-i-j
Abhijeet Prasad Bodas
Tushar912