I imagine this can be improved in various ways, but I've initialized
this with all the **Changes** entries recorded in either zulip.yaml or
the rest of the API documentation, and I expect we'll be able to
iterate on this effectively.
It'll also be useful as a record of changes that we should remember to
document the API documentation as we document more endpoints that
currently don't discuss these issues.
While working on this, I fixed various issues where feature levels
could be mentioned or endpoints didn't properly document changes.
Firstly, change endpoint descriptions in zulip.yaml so that they
match their counterpart in the api docs. Then edit the api docs
so that they use api description markdown extension for displaying
endpoint description.
Add function in openapi.py to access endpoint descriptions written
in zulip.yaml. Use this function for creating a markdown extension
for rendering endpoint descriptions written in zulip.yaml.
We use this extension for a single endpoint to get test coverage.
Includes this change:
* openapi/python_examples: Update get_single_user.
This updates get_single_user to pass keyword arguments to
get_user_by_id instead of passing a dictionary.
Which is required for CI to pass, as we indeed fixed the API of that
function (which had only been present with the wrong API for one release).
The purpose is to provide a way for (non-webapp) clients,
like the mobile and terminal apps, to tell whether the
server it's talking to is new enough to support a given
API feature -- in particular a way that
* is finer-grained than release numbers, so that for
features developed after e.g. 2.1.0 we can use them
immediately on servers deployed from master (like
chat.zulip.org and zulipchat.com) without waiting the
months until a 2.2 release;
* is reliable, unlike e.g. looking at the number of
commits since a release;
* doesn't lead to a growing bag of named feature flags
which the server has to go on sending forever.
Tweaked by tabbott to extend the documentation.
Closes#14618.
Openapi had descriptive response codes for endpoints with multiple
responses for same response code. But this does not fall in line
with openapi specifications. So change descriptive response codes
like "400_auth" and "400_anauth" to "400_0" and "400_1" for all
such endpoints. Also make the necessary changes in openapi.py so
as to be able to read the schema in such cases and generate example
in such cases.
zulip.yaml is not in compliance with openapi specifications file.
Edit it so that it passes verification as an openapi specification
file.
Fixes#14582 .
This is be useful for the mobile and desktop apps to hand an uploaded
file off to the system browser so that it can render PDFs (Etc.).
The S3 backend implementation is simple; for the local upload backend,
we use Django's signing feature to simulate the same sort of 60-second
lifetime token.
Co-Author-By: Mateusz Mandera <mateusz.mandera@protonmail.com>
"description: |" supports markdown and is overall better for
writing multiline paragraphs. So use it in multiline paragraphs
and line-wrap the newly formed paragraphs accordingly.
Edited by tabbott to change most single-line descriptions to use this
format as well.
This commit moves /rest-error-handling examples to components section so
that they can be re-used in individual endpoints where it's example can
be highlighted more easiy.
Generated by `pyupgrade --py3-plus --keep-percent-format` on all our
Python code except `zthumbor` and `zulip-ec2-configure-interfaces`,
followed by manual indentation fixes.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
This commit reuses the existing infrastructure for moving a topic
within a stream to add support for moving topics from one stream to
another.
Split from the original full-feature commit so that we can merge just
the backend, which is finished, at this time.
This is a large part of #6427.
The feature is incomplete, in that we don't have real-time update of
the frontend to handle the event, documentation, etc., but this commit
is a good mergable checkpoint that we can do further work on top of.
We also still ideally would have a test_events test for the backend,
but I'm willing to leave that for follow-up work.
This appears to have switched to tabbott as the author during commit
squashing sometime ago, but this commit is certainly:
Co-Authored-By: Wbert Adrián Castro Vera <wbertc@gmail.com>
This commit migrates zulip outging webhook payload to
/zulip-outgoing-webhook:post in OpenAPI.
Since this migrates the last payloads from api/fixtures.json to
OpenAPI, this commit removes api/fixtures.json file and the functions
accessing the file.
Tweaked by tabbott to further remove an unnecessary conditional.
In zulip.yaml simple json success response which only contains 'msg'
and 'result' properties has been described repeatedly in multiple
endpoints. Instead, use SimpleSuccess template for such responses
to increase code modularity and reusablility.
Migrate "call_on_each_event" from api/arguments.json to
/events:real-time in OpenAPI.
This is a bit of a hack, but it lets us eliminate this secondary
arguments.json file, which is probably worth it.
Tweaked by tabbott to fix various formatting issues in the original
documentation while I was looking at it.
Most part of "/message/{message_id}" is migrated to OpenAPI. This commit
migrated the remaning payload "update-message-edit-permission-error"
from "api/fixtures.json" to OpenAPI. This commit also fixes an error
schema in "zulip.yaml" for this payload.
This refactors get_single_user to use get_user_by_id instead of
call_endpoint. Doing so is only possible now that we've upgraded
python-zulip-api to a version with the new function.
The previous system for documenting arguments was very ugly if any of
the examples or descriptions were wrong. After thinking about this
for a while, I concluded the core problem was that a table was the
wrong design element to use for API parameters, and we'd be much
better off with individual card-type widgets instead.
This rewrites the API arguments documentation implementation to use a
basic sort of card-like system with some basic styling; I think the
result is a lot more readable, and it's a lot more clear how we would
add additional OpenAPI details (like parameter types) to the
documentation.
This refactors remove_reaction in python_examples.py to validate the
result with validate_against_openapi_schema. Minor changes and some
additions have been made to the OpenAPI format data for
/messages/{message_id}/reactions endpoint.
This refactors add_reaction in python_examples.py to use the
openapi_test_function decorator and validate result with
validate_against_openapi_schema. Minor changes have been made to the
OpenAPI format data for /messages/{message_id}/reactions endpoint.
This also adds add-emoji.md to templates/zerver/api and adds
add-emoji to rest-endpoints.md (templates/zerver/help/include).
This refactors get_members_backend to return user data of a single
user in the form of a dictionary (earlier being a list with a single
dictionary).
This also refactors it to return the data with an appropriate key
(inside a dictionary), "user" or "members", according to the type of
data being returned.
Tweaked by tabbott to use somewhat less opaque code and simple OpenAPI
descriptions.
This commit mostly makes our tests less
noisy, since emails are no longer an important
detail of sending messages (they're not even
really used in the API).
It also sets us up to have more scrutiny
on delivery_email/email in the future
for things that actually matter. (This is
a prep commit for something along those
lines, kind of hard to explain the full
plan.)
Steve Howell
Tim Abbott
orientor
Eeshan Garg
Anders Kaseorg
Hashir Sarwar
shubhamgupta2956
Stefan Weil
Kartik Srivastava