Notably, this adds our checks on translated message strings to
`tools/test-all`, so that they don't cause surprise failures in
CI after a branch is pushed. (Alternately they could have gone
in `tools/lint` to accomplish the same goal, but `makemessages`
which they depend on is quite slow -- on my machine it takes 7s,
compared to 10s for all of `tools/lint`.)
This commit adds a new linter which runs from tools/travis/backend.
It runs over the translations.json file and checks if any of the
translatable string contains handlebars in it.
Fixes#5544
Apparently Travis CI has a very strange issue today that causes our
Nagios/E2E tests to have Tornado failing to connect to RabbitMQ.
Causes unknown, but I've spent a day trying to debug this without
luck, and we need our test suites passing in the meantime.
The original test was written in shell script which launches a new
django instance for every tests. By doing it in Python, we avoid
the overhead and reduce the test time to <1 second.
Fixes#3620.
- Add script to compile documentation build and start crawler
to check documentation.
- Add documentation test script to backend travis test case.
- Add log level argument to test-documentation script.
Fixes#1492
It seems that we no longer get the message, 'zerver/lib/actions.py
modified; restarting server', but the server reloads successfully
nonetheless.
Fixes: #1341.
This test caught a few bugs where refactoring had made management
commands fail (and would have caught a few more recent ones).
Ideally we'd replace this with a more advanced test that actually
tests that the management command do something useful, but it's a
start.
With this change, we are now testing the production static asset
pipeline and installation process in a new testing job (and also run
the frontend/backend tests separately).
This means that changes that break the Zulip static asset pipeline or
production installation process are more likely to fail tests. The
testing is imperfect in that it does not have proper isolation -- we
build a complete Zulip development environment and then install a
Zulip production environment on top of it, so e.g. any apt
dependencies installed for Zulip development will still be available
for the Zulip production environment. But, it's better than nothing!
A good v2 of this would be to have the production setup process just
install the minimum stuff needed to run `build-release-tarball` and
then uninstall it / clean it up so that we can do a more clear
production installation, but that's more work.
Greg Price
Umair Khan
Tim Abbott
Cynthia Lin
Joshua Pan
Tommy Ip
Pweaver (Paul Weaver)
K.Kanakhin
Tim Abbott
Eklavya Sharma
rahuldeve