This commit removes invited_as_values map in settings_invites.js.
This object has been removed to avoid duplication as we already
have role values in settings_config.js.
A similar map is created from settings_config.user_role_values
in settings_config.js and is used to populate invited_as_text
for invites.
This commit changes the PreregistrationUser.invite_as dict to have
same set of values as we have for UserProfile.role.
This also adds a data migration to update the already exisiting
PreregistrationUser and MultiuseInvite objects.
We can now invite new users as realm owners. We restrict only
owners to invite new users as owners both for single invite
and multiuse invite link. Also, only owners can revoke or resend
owner invitations.
Member of the org can able see list of invitations sent by him/her.
given permission for the member to revoke and resend the invitations
sent by him/her and added tests for test member can revoke and resend
the invitations only sent by him/her.
Fixes#14007.
For some widgets we now avoid duplicate redraw
events from this old pattern:
widget = list_render.create(..., {
}).init();
widget.sort(...);
The above code was wasteful and possibly
flicker-y due to the fact that `init` and
`sort` both render.
Now we do this:
widget = list_render.create(..., {
init_sort: [...],
});
For other widgets we just clean up the need
to call `init()` right after `create()`.
We also allow widgets to pass in `sort_fields`
during initialization (since you may want to
have `init_sort` use a custom sort before the
first render.)
Finally, we make the second and third calls
eliminate the prior updates from the previous
widget. This can prevent strange bugs with
double-reversing columns (although that's
been prevented in a better way with a recent
commit), as well as avoiding double work
with sorting.
I pushed this risk commit to the end of
a PR that had a bunch of harmless prep
commits at the front, and I didn't make
it clear enough that the last commit (this
one) hadn't been tested thoroughly.
For the list_render widget, we can simplify
the intialization pretty easily (avoid
extra sorts, for example), but the cache aspects
are still tricky on subsequent calls.
For some widgets we now avoid duplicate redraw
events from this old pattern:
widget = list_render.create(..., {
}).init();
widget.sort(...);
The above code was wasteful and possibly
flicker-y due to the fact that `init` and
`sort` both render.
Now we do this:
widget = list_render.create(..., {
init_sort: [...],
});
For other widgets we just clean up the need
to call `init()` right after `create()`.
We also allow widgets to pass in `sort_fields`
during initialization (since you may want to
have `init_sort` use a custom sort before the
first render.)
The get() logic here was broken, because
when you enter the settings panel for invites
on the 2nd or 3rd time, the text filter
would not work.
This commit doesn't intend to fix the problem; it
just simplifies the code for a later commit
that fixes this holistically.
The way that we update `list_render` objects
is janky with respect to events, so we can end
up double-sorting lists (which puts them back
to normal) and strange things like that.
Before this fix, we'd get a traceback if you looked
at invites in the settings (and if one of them was
a multi-user invite link). This commit fixes
that problem by adding a custom sort.
We also rename the "Email" column to "Invitee",
since it's often the case the invitee isn't an
actually an email, but it's instead a multi-use
link.
Note that the invites UI only works the first time you
enter settings. Many of the controls break the second
time you enter it. You can't sort by column header
or use the text filter.
I'll fix that in a subsequent commit.
The filter "callback" was only a "callback" in the
most general sense of the word.
It's just a filter predicate that returns a bool.
This is to prepare for another filtering option,
where the caller can filter the whole list
themselves. I haven't figured out what I will name
the new option yet, but I know I want to make the
two options have specific names.
This commit was originally automatically generated using `tools/lint
--only=eslint --fix`. It was then modified by tabbott to contain only
changes to a set of files that are unlikely to result in significant
merge conflicts with any open pull request, excluding about 20 files.
His plan is to merge the remaining changes with more precise care,
potentially involving merging parts of conflicting pull requests
before running the `eslint --fix` operation.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
With webpack, variables declared in each file are already file-local
(Global variables need to be explicitly exported), so these IIFEs are
no longer needed.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
Apparently, we didn't have one of these, and thus had a moderate
number of generally very old violations in the codebase. Fix this and
clear the ones that exist..
This commit prepares the frontend code to be consumed by webpack.
It is a hack: In theory, modules should be declaring and importing the
modules they depend on and the globals they expose directly.
However, that requires significant per-module work, which we don't
really want to block moving our toolchain to webpack on.
So we expose the modules by setting window.varName = varName; as
needed in the js files.
This is preparation for enabling an eslint indentation configuration.
90% of these changes are just fixes for indentation errors that have
snuck into the codebase over the years; the others are more
significant reformatting to make eslint happy (that are not otherwise
actually improvements).
The one area that we do not attempt to work on here is the
"switch/case" indentation.
This cleans repeating code in error callback in settings.
We made a generic function in `ui_report.js` which require two
arguments `xhr` and `btn`; we preferred `btn` over `row` as argument
because a row may have more than one buttons.
Fixes: #8788.
Lets administrators view a list of open(unconfirmed) invitations and
resend or revoke a chosen invitation.
There are a few changes that we can expect for the future:
* It is currently possible to invite an email that you have already
invited, it might make sense to change this behavior.
* Resend currently sends an invite reminder instead of resending the
original invite, this is because 'custom_body' was not stored when
the first invite was sent.
Tweaked in various minor ways, primarily in the backend, by tabbott,
mostly for style consistency with the rest of the codebase.
Fixes: #1180.
sahil839
jagansivam28
Steve Howell
Anders Kaseorg
Thomas Ip
Vishnu Ks
Tim Abbott
Rishi Gupta
Jeswin
Shubham Dhama
Armaan Ahluwalia
Harshit Bansal
Aastha Gupta
snlkapil
Henrik Pettersson