232eb8b7cf changed how these pages work, to render inline instead of
serving from a URL, but did not update the SMTP use case; this made
SMTP failures redirect to a 404.
Two registration requests for the same email address can race,
leading to an IntegrityError when making the second user.
Catch this and redirect them to the login page for their existing
email.
Making request a mandatory kwarg avoids confusion about the meaning of
parameters, especially with `request` acquiring the ability to be None
in the upcoming next commit.
To make creation of demo organizations feel lightweight for users,
we do not want to require an email address at sign-up. Instead an
empty string will used for the new realm owner's email. Currently
implements that for new demo organizations in the development
environment.
Because the user's email address does not exist, we don't enqueue
any of the welcome emails upon account/realm creation, and we
don't create/send new login emails.
This is a part of #19523.
Co-authored by: Tim Abbott <tabbott@zulip.com>
Co-authored by: Lauryn Menard <lauryn@zulip.com>
Since 74dd21c8fa in Zulip Server 2.1.0, if:
- ZulipLDAPAuthBackend and an external authentication backend (any aside
of ZulipLDAPAuthBackend and EmailAuthBackend) are the only ones
enabled in AUTHENTICATION_BACKENDS in /etc/zulip/settings.py
- The organization permissions don't require invitations to join
...then an attacker can create a new account in the organization with
an arbitrary email address in their control that's not in the
organization's LDAP directory.
The impact is limited to installations which have the specific
combination of authentication backends described above, in addition to
having the "Invitations are required for joining this organization
organization" permission disabled.
In commit fc58c35c0, we added a check in various emails for the
settings.CORPORATE_ENABLED value, but that context is only always
included for views/templates with a request.
Here we add that to common_context, which is often used when there
is not a request (like with emails). And we manually add it to the
email context in various cases when there is not a user account to
call with common_context: new user invitations, registration emails,
and realm reactivation emails.
Previously, entering an organization via 'accounts/go' with the
web-public stream enabled took the user to the web-public view
even if the user was not logged in.
Now, a user is always redirected to the 'login_page' with
the next parameter, if present.
The 'login_page' view is updated to redirect an authenticated
user based on the 'next' parameter instead of always redirecting
to 'realm.uri'.
Fixes#23344.
The "Resend" link for realm creation was not working correctly
because it is implemented by basically submiting the registration
form again which results in resending the email but all the
required parameters were not passed to the form after recent
changes in the realm creation flow.
This commit fixes it by passing all the required parameters -
email, realm name, realm type and realm subdomain, when submitting
form again by clicking on the "resend" link.
Fixes#25249.
This commit adds the fields related to realm creation form using
get_realm_create_form_context in the context passed to register.html
template to avoid duplication.
In previous commits, we updated the realm creation flow to show
the realm name, type and subdomain fields in the first form
when asking for the email of the user. This commit updates the
user registration form to show the already filled realm details
as non-editable text and there is also a button to edit the
realm details before registration.
We also update the sub-heading for user registration form as
mentioned in the issue.
Fixes part of #24307.
We now use PreregistrationRealm objects in registration_helper
function when creating new realms instead of PreregistrationUser
objects.
Fixes part of #24307.
We now show inputs for realm details like name, type and URL
in the create_realm.html template opened for "/new" url and
these information will be stored in PreregistrationRealm
objects in further commits.
We add a new class RealmDetailsForm in forms.py for this
such that it is used as a base class for RealmCreationForm
and we define RealmDetailsForm such that we can use it as
a subclass for RegistrationForm as well to avoid duplication.
This commit renames prereg_user variable in
check_prereg_key and get_prereg_key_and_redirect
functions in zerver/views/registration.py to
prereg_object as in further commits the
preregistration object could also be
PreregistrationRealm object as part of changes
for #24307.
While the function which processes the realm registration and
signup remains the same, we use different urls and functions to
call the process so that we can separately track them. This will
help us know the conversion rate of realm registration after
receiving the confirmation link.
We now allow user to change email_address_visibility during user
signup and it overrides the realm-level default and also overrides
the setting if user import settings from existing account.
We do not show UI to set email_address_visibility during realm
creation.
Fixes#24310.
This commit adds backend code to set email_address_visibility when
registering a new user. The realm-level default and the value of
source profile gets overridden by the value user selected during
signup.
This will help us track if users actually clicked on the
email confirmation link while creating a new organization.
Replaced all the `reder` calls in `accounts_register` with
`TemplateResponse` to comply with `add_google_analytics`
decorator.
Since we want to use `accounts/new/send_confirm` to know how many
users actually register after visiting the register page, we
added it to Google Tag Manager, but GTM tracks every user
registration separately due <email> in the URL
making it harder to track.
To solve this, we want to pass <email> as a GET parameter which
can be easily filtered inside GTM using a RegEx and all the
registrations can be tracked as one.
Track `create_realm` and `new_realm_send_confirm` using
google analytics.
This will help us track number of users who want to
create a new Zulip organization.
The previous error page was inadequate for serving the two different
scenarios where we show errors in realm_creations, in particular
containing a misleading sentence about realm creation being disabled
(even in the case where it was actually enabled and the user simply had
an expired link).
Our seat count calculation is different for guest user than normal users
(a number of initial guests are free, and additional marginal guests are
worth 1/5 of a seat) - so these checks we apply when a user is being
invited or signing up need to know whether it's a guest or non-guest
being added.
This refactors rate limit related functions from `zerver.decorator` to
zerver.lib.rate_limiter.
We conditionally import `RemoteZulipServer`, `RequestNotes`, and
`RateLimitedRemoteZulipServer` to avoid circular dependency.
Most instances of importing these functions from `zerver.decorator` got
updated, with a few exceptions in `zerver.tests.test_decorators`, where
we do want to mock the rate limiting functions imported in
`zerver.decorator`. The same goes with the mocking example in the
"testing-with-django" documentation.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
The .status value of EmailChangeStatus was not being looked
at anywhere to prevent re-use of email change confirmation links. This
is not a security issue, since the EmailChangeStatus object has a fixed
value for the new_email, while the confirmation link has expiry time of
1 day, which prevents any reasonable malicious scenarios.
We fix this by making get_object_from_key look at
confirmation.content_object.status - which applies
generally to all confirmations where the attached object has the .status
attribute. This is desired, because we never want to
successfully get_object_from_key an object that has already been used or
reused.
This makes the prereg_user.status check in check_prereg_key redundant so
it can be deleted.
Fixes#21266.
We want to tie the prereg_user to the MultiUseInvite directly rather
than to the MultiUserInvite's confirmation object, because the latter is
not possible. This is because the flow is that after going through the
multiuse invite link, the PreregistrationUser is created together with a
Confirmation object, creating a confirmation link (via
create_confirmation_link) to which then the user is redirected to finish
account creation. This means that the PreregistrationUser is already
tied to a Confirmation, so that attribute is occupied.
Before this, a link still couldn't be re-used because it would trip up
exception further down user creation codepaths, but that was still a
bug. check_prereg_key is supposed to correctly validate the key - and
trigger an error page being returned if a key (or for any other reason,
the attached PreregistrationUser object) is reused.
test_validate_email_not_already_in_realm needs to be adjusted, because
it was actually re-using a key.
To explain the rationale of this change, for example, there is
`get_user_activity_summary` which accepts either a `Collection[UserActivity]`,
where `QuerySet[T]` is not strictly `Sequence[T]` because its slicing behavior
is different from the `Protocol`, making `Collection` necessary.
Similarily, we should have `Iterable[T]` instead of `List[T]` so that
`QuerySet[T]` will also be an acceptable subtype, or `Sequence[T]` when we
also expect it to be indexed.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
We no longer need to access the internal `LANGUAGE_CODE` attribute by
using `django.utils.translation.get_language`.
A test case overriding the translation is added to ensure the password
reset form sending to users requested from a wrong domain is properly
translated.
This is a part of django-stubs refactorings.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
`request.session` is `django.contrib.sessions.backends.base.SessionBase`
`instead of django.contrib.sessions.models.Session`.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This commit reads the browser locale during user registration, and
sets it as default language of user if it is supported by Zulip.
Otherwise, it is set to realm's default language.
We now call this function inside do_create_user(...,
realm_creation=True), which generally improves readability and
robustness of the codebase.
This fixes a bug where this onboarding content was not correctly done
when creating a realm via LDAP, and also will be important as we add
new code paths that might let you create a realm.
Alex Vandiver
Anders Kaseorg
Mateusz Mandera
Eeshan Garg
Lauryn Menard
Prakhar Pratyush
Sahil Batra
Aman Agrawal
Zixuan James Li
Tim Abbott
Zixuan James Li
Siddharth Asthana