Upgrading stripe to 6.0.0 in e32366638a
breaks our Stripe integration due to API version change making us fail
to finalize creating an invoice and charge the customer.
For the upstream details see:
60ab6ac7d7/CHANGELOG.md (600---2023-08-16)
6.0.0 uses 2023-08-16 Stripe API version unless specified otherwise. We
want to use 2020-08-27.
Setting stripe.api_version in corporate/lib/stripe.py is sufficient for
it to be set everywhere else. This is supported by the fact that we also
only set stripe.api_key in that file.
Fixes two bugs involving organization with
exempt_from_license_number_check enabled:
1. If the organization had e.g. 100 users and upgraded their plan,
specifying 50 licenses, the generated LicenseLedger and thus the
corresponding invoice was still for 100 users.
2. The organization was unable to use the billing/plan endpoint (update
plan endpoint) to make their number of licenses less than the current
number of users.
Organizations with exempt_from_license_number_check are supposed to be
able to declare whatever license number they want, as this attribute
allows having pricing schemes where an organization only pays us for a
subset of their users.
This migration applies under the assumption that extra_data_json has
been populated for all existing and coming audit log entries.
- This removes the manual conversions back and forth for extra_data
throughout the codebase including the orjson.loads(), orjson.dumps(),
and str() calls.
- The custom handler used for converting Decimal is removed since
DjangoJSONEncoder handles that for extra_data.
- We remove None-checks for extra_data because it is now no longer
nullable.
- Meanwhile, we want the bouncer to support processing RealmAuditLog entries for
remote servers before and after the JSONField migration on extra_data.
- Since now extra_data should always be a dict for the newer remote
server, which is now migrated, the test cases are updated to create
RealmAuditLog objects by passing a dict for extra_data before
sending over the analytics data. Note that while JSONField allows for
non-dict values, a proper remote server always passes a dict for
extra_data.
- We still test out the legacy extra_data format because not all
remote servers have migrated to use JSONField extra_data.
This verifies that support for extra_data being a string or None has not
been dropped.
Co-authored-by: Siddharth Asthana <siddharthasthana31@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Translators benefit from the extra information in the field names, and
need the reordering freedom that isn’t available with multiple
positional fields.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Note that we use the DjangoJSONEncoder so that we have builtin support
for parsing Decimal and datetime.
During this intermediate state, the migration that creates
extra_data_json field has been run. We prepare for running the backfilling
migration that populates extra_data_json from extra_data.
This change implements double-write, which is important to keep the
state of extra data consistent. For most extra_data usage, this is
handled by the overriden `save` method on `AbstractRealmAuditLog`, where
we either generates extra_data_json using orjson.loads or
ast.literal_eval.
While backfilling ensures that old realm audit log entries have
extra_data_json populated, double-write ensures that any new entries
generated will also have extra_data_json set. So that we can then safely
rename extra_data_json to extra_data while ensuring the non-nullable
invariant.
For completeness, we additionally set RealmAuditLog.NEW_VALUE for
the USER_FULL_NAME_CHANGED event. This cannot be handled with the
overridden `save`.
This addresses: https://github.com/zulip/zulip/pull/23116#discussion_r1040277795
Note that extra_data_json at this point is not used yet. So the test
cases do not need to switch to testing extra_data_json. This is later
done after we rename extra_data_json to extra_data.
Double-write for the remote server audit logs is special, because we only
get the dumped bytes from an external source. Luckily, none of the
payload carries extra_data that is not generated using orjson.dumps for
audit logs of event types in SYNC_BILLING_EVENTS. This can be verified
by looking at:
`git grep -A 6 -E "event_type=.*(USER_CREATED|USER_ACTIVATED|USER_DEACTIVATED|USER_REACTIVATED|USER_ROLE_CHANGED|REALM_DEACTIVATED|REALM_REACTIVATED)"`
Therefore, we just need to populate extra_data_json doing an
orjson.loads call after a None-check.
Co-authored-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
exempt_from_license_number_check was initially added allowing
organizations with it enabled to invite new users above their number of
licenses.
However, an organization with this permission enabled,
cannot upgrade if they weren't on a plan already - because when choosing
Manual license management, you cannot enter a number of licenses lower
than the current seat count. However, an organization like that probably
already has some users that they get free of charge - and thus they need
to be able to enter a lower number of licenses in order to upgrade.
Updates the message sent by the notification bot when an
organization is approved for full sponsorship on Zulip
Cloud Standard to include a request to list and link to
Zulip on any acknowledgement or sponsorship pages.
Adds the count of users with the role of guest to the stats view
`page_params` via a database query. This information is then added
to the summary statistics section of the analytics page after being
formatted by `stats.js`.
Creates Bassanio as a guest user in the database for the analytics
realm.
Fixes#20162.
Our seat count calculation is different for guest user than normal users
(a number of initial guests are free, and additional marginal guests are
worth 1/5 of a seat) - so these checks we apply when a user is being
invited or signing up need to know whether it's a guest or non-guest
being added.
This is a simple generalization of get_latest_seat_count and is useful
for calculating "what will be the realm's license count if this
number of (guest) users is added?" without duplicating any of the math
logic. Will be used in the next commits.
Our billing FAQ says:
"For an organization with N other users, 5*N guest users are included at
no extra charge. After that, you will be charged at 1/5 of your regular
per-user pricing for each additional guest.".
It wasn't quite intuitive to me that
max(non_guests, math.ceil(guests / 5)) achieves that pricing, so it's
worth mentioning in a comment that it does and that that's why that
formula is used.
`extra_data` as a `TextField` expects a `str`, but we had been passing
`dict` instead. This is a temporary solution before #18391 to fix the
type annotation.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
When being called, the wrapped function is passed `PaymentIntent`
(the `content_object` of `Event`). With that, since `customer` can be
`None`, an assertion is also required.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Now that we pass in the UserProfile.id in the metadata to Stripe's
PaymentIntent objects, we no longer need to retrieve the user via
delivery_email. It makes more sense to just fetch the user by ID
and then get the latest delivery_email directly.
Note that an update to Stripe's fixtures is not necessary here
since a previous commit already modified the metadata passed to
both stripe.Session/PaymentIntent objects.
Previously, our Stripe webhook event handler code retrieved the
user's email from Stripe using the stripe.Customer.email attribute.
This led to situations such that whenever the email that Stripe had
did not correspond to a UserProfile in Zulip, the payment flow
failed since we couldn't find a UserProfile associated with the
given email.
Now, we pass in the UserProfile.id in the metadata to Stripe's
checkout Session object, so that we can fetch the correct email
in future Stripe requests.
It is confusing to have the plan type constants not be namespaced
by the thing they represent. We already have a namespacing
convention in place for constants, so we should use it for
Realm.plan_type as well.
compute_plan_parameters assumed that the value of
tier is always CustomerPlan.STANDARD. We change that behavior
to make the function handle CustomerPlan.PLUS as well.
Mateusz Mandera
Zixuan James Li
Anders Kaseorg
Zixuan Li
Lauryn Menard
Zixuan James Li
Aman Agrawal
Eeshan Garg
Vishnu KS