Edit history of message was rendered directly without passing
it through rendered_markdown.js. Due to this several visual
features for dynamic elements like time, spoilers, mentions
etc were not available.
To fix above issues we pass the content of edit-history
through rendered_markdown before showing edit history modal.
Fixes: #16029.
The previous internationalization approach didn't support languages
with a different word order than English.
We also switch to using "moved" to explain topic/stream moves,
consistent with how the message feed explains it.
The recent commits to display the previous and new streams for a moved
message did not correctly handle messages moved multiple times.
To do this, we need to do a somewhat awkward loop, at least until we
modify the API to do this loop for us.
In d0f8515b50, it was noticed that
Bootstrap's `hide` and `show` calls can cause race conditions.
So, migrate to our `overlay` calls to handle Bootstrap modals.
ES and TypeScript modules are strict by default and don’t need this
directive. ESLint will remind us to add it to new CommonJS files and
remove it from ES and TypeScript modules.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Prettier would do this anyway, but it’s separated out for a more
reviewable diff. Generated by ESLint.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Previously, the edit history modal did not respect the time format
setting (whether to show times in 12-hour or 24-hour format) when
displaying message edit times (#15171).
This commit fixes that by passing the edit times to
timerender.stringify_time(), which takes that setting into account,
instead of just doing a static string formatting operation.
This bug has existed since February 2017, when the edit history UI
was first added in 1a697b6e02.
Fixes#15171.
Currently, the edit history modal does not respect the time format
setting (whether to show times in 12-hour or 24-hour format) when
displaying message edit times (#15171).
This commit refactors how fetch_and_render_message_history() handles
times in order to make fixing that issue in a reasonable way easier.
It will be fixed in a following commit.
Previously, the show_date_row flag for the first entry in the edit
history modal was directly set to `true`, while in all other entries
it was calculated with identical code. Though show_date_row for the
first entry should indeed always be true, there's no need for it to be
a special case.
In preparation for factoring out the calculation of show_date_row,
this commit nominally calculates the first entry's show_date_row with
the same code that is used to calculate show_date_row for all other
entries. Nominally, because it will still always end up being true.
Previously, the logic for when to add a date row to an edit history
entry was checking against the date of the original message (which is
always the first entry in the message history), not the date of the
previous edit. This caused every edit not made on the date of the
original message to show a date row, even if it wasn't the first edit
on that date.
This commit fixes that bug by updating prev_timestamp after processing
each message history entry, whereas before it was only updated after
processing the first one — the original message.
This bug has existed since June 2017, when
84e5fe733c changed how date rows worked;
from only showing one at the top labeled "Earliest" to each entry
having a possibilty of showing one.
Previously it was impossible for a topic-only edit to show a date row
in any circumstance; the code that handles topic-only edits didn't
even attempt to set show_date_row, the flag that determines whether a
date row should be rendered. Now a topic-only edit will show a date row
in the same circumstances as any other edit[1].
This bug has existed since March 2019, when rendering of topic-only
edits was first added in 38be5ea743.
[1] Currently, "the same circumstances as any other edit" means
there'll be a date row on the original message, and then on every edit
not made on the same date as the original message, even if it was't
the first edit on the date it was made. This is a bug that will be
fixed in a following commit. This commit is being made first since
it's fixing a lack-of-information bug, whereas the other bug is a
somewhat less important repeating-information bug.
Anders Kaseorg
Purushottam Tiwari
Tim Abbott
somesh202
Ganesh Pawar
Priyank Patel
Sharif Naas