This is based on usage in bulk_change_user_names.py, and that
the RealmAuditLog acting_user field is Optional[UserProfile].
This could be more meaningfully changed in future, perhaps to
indicate that the command was run by a specific zulip user.
In order to get test coverage on topic name checks, we
do them in Addressee, so that we don't hit an assertion
first. The assertion in question is in Addressee.topic(),
and it was added partly to appease mypy.
Adds a check for newline that was present on backend, but missing in the
frontend markdown implementation. Updating messages uses is_me_message flag
received from server instead of its own partial test. Similarly, rendering
previews uses markdown code.
Fixes#6493.
This is the first step for allowing users
to edit a bot's service entries, name the
outgoing webhook configuration entries. The
chosen data structures allow for a future
with multiple services per bot; right now,
only one service per bot is supported.
We add two functions:
1.) check_schedule_message(): This function is responsible for
doing the essential initial checkes to verify the validity of
the message. These checkes include things like if user is
allowed to send messages to some stream or not or if the user is
a super_user. All this is basically done by further calling
check_message() with appropriate parameters. This is on the same
lines as is check_send_message().
2.) do_schedule_messages(): This function is responsible for
creating ScheduleMessage table rows for a list of messages that
are to be scheduled. This basically accumulates the ScheduleMessage
objects in a list and then bulk creates the rows.
The original logic is buggy now that emails can belong to (and be
invited to) multiple realms.
The new logic in the `invites` queue worker also avoids the bug where
when the PreregistrationUser was gone by the time the queue worker got
to the invite (e.g., because it'd been revoked), we threw an exception.
[greg: fix upgrade-compatibility logic; add test; explain
revoked-invite race above]
This code changes frequently enough that errors are bound to creep in. The
main change is that this sends the original invitation email instead of the
reminder email, but I think that's fine.
[Modified by greg to (1) keep `USERNAME_FIELD = 'email'`,
(2) silence the corresponding system check, and (3) ban
reusing a system bot's email address, just like we do in
realm creation.]
As we migrate to allow reuse of the same email with multiple realms,
we need to replace the old "no email reuse" validators. Because
stealing the email for a system bot would be problematic, we still ban
doing so.
This commit only affects the realm creation logic, not registering an
account in an existing realm.
We would allow a user with a valid invitation for one realm to use it
on a different realm instead. On a server with multiple realms, an
authorized user of one realm could use this (by sending invites to
other email addresses they control) to create accounts on other
realms. (CVE-2017-0910)
With this commit, when sending an invitation, we record the inviting
user's realm on the PreregistrationUser row; and when registering a
user, we check that the PregistrationUser realm matches the realm the
user is trying to register on. This resolves CVE-2017-0910 for
newly-sent invitations; the next commit completes the fix.
[greg: rewrote commit message]
This fixes some subtle JavaScript exceptions we've been getting in
zulipchat.com, caused by the system bot realm there not being "zulip"
interacting with get_cross_realm_users.
This should help protect us from future issues with the way that
`bulk_get_users` does caching.
It's likely that we'll want to further restructure `bulk_get_users` to
not have this base_query code path altogether (since it's kinda
buggy), but I'm going to defer that for a time when we have another
user.
We include ERROR_BOT in this set, even though it's not technically
cross-realm (it just lives in the admin realm).
This code path does not correctly handle emails that correspond to
multiple accounts (because `get_system_bot` does not). Since it's
intended to only be used by system bots, we add an appropriate
assertion to ensure it is only used for system bots.
Previously, this was a ValidationError, but that doesn't really make
sense, since this condition reflects an actual bug in the code.
Because this happened to be our only test coverage the ValidationError
catch on line 84 of registration.py, we add nocoverage there for now.
This fixes a bug where, when a user is unsubscribed from a stream,
they might have unread messages on that stream leak. While it might
seem to be a minor problem, it can cause significant problems for
computing the `unread_msgs` data structures, since it means we need to
add an extra filter for whether the user is still subscribed, either
in the backend or in the UI.
Fixes#7095.
neiljp (Neil Pilgrim)
Vishnu Ks
Greg Price
rht
Shubham Dhama
Weronika Grzybowska
Robert Hönig
YJDave
Aditya Bansal
snlkapil
Rishi Gupta
Rhea Parekh
Shreyansh Dwivedi
Tim Abbott