If a user deletes message between when it triggered a potential push
notification for another user, and when that notification was actually
sent, we'd end up with a situation where the `Message` table didn't
have an entry for the requested message ID.
The clean fix for this is to still throw an exception in the event
that the message doesn't exist at all, but if it exists in
ArchivedMessage, don't throw a user-facing exception.
This seems to happen when Apple is having a partial outage on some of
their APNS shards; it should be treated like other networking errors
connecting to APNS (with an automatic retry).
Apparently, we have a second code path where we might try to call
send_email library functions on old data, namely in the
queue_processors codebase. So we apply the same migration logic here.
This adds a function that sends provided email to all administrators
of a realm, but in a single email. As a result, send_email now takes
arguments to_user_ids and to_emails instead of to_user_id and
to_email.
We adjust other APIs to match, but note that send_future_email does
not yet support the multiple recipients model for good reasons.
Tweaked by tabbott to modify `manage.py deliver_email` to handle
backwards-compatibily for any ScheduledEmail objects already in the
database.
Fixes#10896.
This prevents the warning about push notifications not being
registered for from being printed in development environment startup
by default. In development, that's the expected state, and we don't
need to spam up the output with that notice.
Previously, we frequently accessed user_profile.realm from outside the
loops that interact with UserProfile objects. This variable reuse
outside the loop could be confusing and should be a style/lint
violation.
While in this case, the behavior was correct (in that all users in the
loops were within the same realm), extracting a separate `realm`
variable significantly clarifies what's going on here.
This reverts commit 2fa77d9d54.
Further investigation has determined that this did not fix the
password-reset problem described in the previous commit message;
meanwhile, it causes other problems. We still need to track down the
root cause of the original password-reset bug.
This provides a nice user experience for folks where we do know what
their LDAP credentials are.
Though we need to fix#10917 before the content in the email with be
correct.
This is the first step of letting users use Zulip markdown in their
SHORT_TEXT and LONG_TEXT custom profile fields, so that they can
include emphasis, links, etc.
This doesn't include any frontend logic yet, however.
This commit changes the return type of get_possible_mentions_info to a
list instead of a dict, thus disposing off the hacky logic of storing
users with duplicate full names with name|id keys that made the code
obfuscated.
The other functions continue to use the dicts as before, however, there
are minor variable changes where needed in accordance with the updated
definition of get_possible_mentions_info.
This function is equivalent to recipient_for_emails, but fetches
user_profiles by IDs, not by emails.
This commit is a part of our efforts surrounding #9474, but is
more primarily geared towards adding support for sending typing
notifications by user IDs.
Previously, get_user_profiles() was split into two functions:
* user_profiles_from_unvalidated_emails, which raised a
ValidationError upon encountering a non-existent user email.
* get_user_profiles, which caught the ValidationError raised
by user_profiles_from_unvalidated_emails and raised a
JsonableError instead.
According to Steve Howell, this complexity is partly a relic
of past refactoring and is unnecessarily heavy. It is better to
just raise JsonableError directly.
recipient_for_emails is used by our typing notifications code.
user_profiles_from_unvalidated_emails is used by our typing
notifications code *and* for sending messages.
user_profiles_from_unvalidated_emails is a part of a larger
framework used by Addressee to validate recipient emails when sending
messages and will eventually need to be removed as we move forward
with #9474. So it makes sense to just inline this function within
recipient_for_emails so that we don't break our typing notifications
code in the future.
This commit is a part of our efforts surrounding #9474.
This library was absolutely essential as part of our Python 2->3
migration process, but all of its calls should be either no-ops or
encode/decode operations.
Note also that the library has been wrong since the incorrect
refactoring in 1f9244e060.
Fixes#10807.
This adds a web flow and management command for reactivating a Zulip
organization, with confirmation from one of the organization
administrators.
Further work is needed to make the emails nicer (ideally, we'd send
one email with all the admins on the `To` line, but the `send_email`
library doesn't support that).
Fixes#10783.
With significant tweaks to the email text by tabbott.
The previous content made it sound like we were actually sending a
push notification, which could be confusing/alarming in some cases
(see e.g. 9c224ccdd3). Instead, we make
clear that we're sending it to all clients (which one might correctly
suspect is vacuous in the development environment).
While it could make sense to print these logging statements at WARN
level on server startup, it doesn't make sense to do so on every
message (though it perhaps did make sense to do so before more recent
changes added good ways to discover you forgot to configure push
notifications).
Instead, we now just do a WARN log on queue processor startup, and
then at DEBUG level for individual messages.
Fixes#10894.
Change the truncation marker from `...` to `\n[message truncated]`
when receiving messages from the API or through e-mail. Also, update
tests to account for the new change.
Fix#10871.
Our recent change in 2fa77d9d54 to
disable the cached_db cache backend broke upgrade-zulip-from-git with
an attributeerror; we fix that by checking the session engine before
trying to access its cache-related attributes.
This is initial work, which will help us establish habits of using a
well-tested approach for renaming a Zulip organization (since as part
of https://github.com/zulip/zulip-mobile/issues/3142, we'll likely
need to make this function do more).
This seems like kind of a silly function to extract
to topic.py, but it will theoretically help us sweep
"subject" if we change the DB.
It had test coverage.
We use the message a lot for the query modified
here, so I think it's worth taking the up-front
hit of getting bulkier objects to avoid O(N)
hops back to the database.