Instead of a WildValue, the JSON/Sentry webhook expect the request body to be a
dict.
For the JSON webhook, json.dumps accepts other types of input as well and the
constraint is not necessary, but this serve as a good example of an alternative
use of WebhookPayload to describe a payload that is intended to be parsed from
the entire request body from JSON, into a type other than WildValue.
Previously, if a user tried to create a webhook using the Webhooks
plugin in Sentry and used the "Test plugin" to test the webhook,
the server would send a 500 error, even though the integration
worked perfectly. This led users to believe that the integration
was not working.
Fixes#26173.
markdown-include is GPL licensed.
Also, rewrite it as a block processor, so that it works correctly
inside indented blocks.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Adds request as a parameter to json_success as a refactor towards
making `ignored_parameters_unsupported` functionality available
for all API endpoints.
Also, removes any data parameters that are an empty dict or
a dict with the generic success response values.
The reason for this bug is because of different striping
processes in the backend and frontend, i.e The frontend
checks if the message's `raw_content` has changed to
decide if the `content` of the message should be sent in
the request to the backend, or not. So, it removes the
leading new line ('\n') from the message `raw_content`
when checking it, which is causing the "Error saving edit:
You don't have permission to edit this message" error.
This commit fixes it by removing the leading new line
when cleaning message content.
The bug was explained by @punchagan and its solution
by @timabbott.
Since FIXTURE_DIR_NAME is the name of the folder that contains the view
and tests modules of the webhook and another folder called "fixtures" that
store the fixtures, it is more appropriate to call it WEBHOOK_DIR_NAME,
especially when we want to refer to the view module using this variable.
Sentry allows adding simple webhooks without going through the process
of creating an Internal Integration in Sentry's Integration
Platform[1] (which our docs recommend).
The payload from sent from such a (simple) webhook integration is
slightly different from the payload sent by an Internal Integration
webhook. This commit tries to wrangle this payload into a form that is
usable by our webhook handler to send a notification message.
[1]: https://sentry.io/integration-platform/
Any exception is an "unexpected event", which means talking about
having an "unexpected event logger" or "unexpected event exception" is
confusing. As the error message in `exceptions.py` already explains,
this is about an _unsupported_ event type.
This also switches the path that these exceptions are written to,
accordingly.
8e10ab282a moved UnexpectedWebhookEventType into
`zerver.lib.exceptions`, but left the import into
`zserver.lib.webhooks.common` so that webhooks could continue to
import the exception from there.
This clutters things and adds complexity; there is no compelling
reason that the exception's source of truth should not move alongside
all other exceptions.
Sentry may get reported multiple exceptions stacks, in the case where
a `raise ...` was caught, and a new exception was `raise`d. In this
case, the `filename` is the most recent exception -- but the
exceptions are stored in the `exception` key in the order in which
they occurred. As such, taking the first value with a `stacktrace`
will result in showing the wrong line, or in no stack trace being
resolved at all.
Look from the last `exception` backwards, for matching stacks.
Almost all webhook tests use this helper, except a few
webhooks that write to private streams.
Being concise is important here, and the name
`self.send_and_test_stream_message` always confused
me, since it sounds you're sending a stream message,
and it leaves out the webhook piece.
We should consider renaming `send_and_test_private_message`
to something like `check_webhook_private`, but I couldn't
decide on a great name, and it's very rarely used. So
for now I just made sure the docstrings of the two
sibling functions reference each other.
Per [1], the sentry API returns frames sorted from oldest to newest.
As such, matching against the first filename that matches is most
likely not the right frame.
Match against the last frame with the guilty filename.
[1] https://develop.sentry.dev/sdk/event-payloads/stacktrace/
Fixes#2665.
Regenerated by tabbott with `lint --fix` after a rebase and change in
parameters.
Note from tabbott: In a few cases, this converts technical debt in the
form of unsorted imports into different technical debt in the form of
our largest files having very long, ugly import sequences at the
start. I expect this change will increase pressure for us to split
those files, which isn't a bad thing.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Automatically generated by the following script, based on the output
of lint with flake8-comma:
import re
import sys
last_filename = None
last_row = None
lines = []
for msg in sys.stdin:
m = re.match(
r"\x1b\[35mflake8 \|\x1b\[0m \x1b\[1;31m(.+):(\d+):(\d+): (\w+)", msg
)
if m:
filename, row_str, col_str, err = m.groups()
row, col = int(row_str), int(col_str)
if filename == last_filename:
assert last_row != row
else:
if last_filename is not None:
with open(last_filename, "w") as f:
f.writelines(lines)
with open(filename) as f:
lines = f.readlines()
last_filename = filename
last_row = row
line = lines[row - 1]
if err in ["C812", "C815"]:
lines[row - 1] = line[: col - 1] + "," + line[col - 1 :]
elif err in ["C819"]:
assert line[col - 2] == ","
lines[row - 1] = line[: col - 2] + line[col - 1 :].lstrip(" ")
if last_filename is not None:
with open(last_filename, "w") as f:
f.writelines(lines)
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
Zixuan James Li
Satyam Bansal
abdullahm1
Lauryn Menard
Alex Vandiver
Anders Kaseorg
Matt Keller
Lauryn Menard
Riken Shah
PIG208
Puneeth Chaganti
Steve Howell
Tim Abbott
Anders Kaseorg