We try to use the correct variation of `email`
or `delivery_email`, even though in some
databases they are the same.
(To find the differences, I temporarily hacked
populate_db to use different values for email
and delivery_email, and reduced email visibility
in the zulip realm to admins only.)
In places where we want the "normal" realm
behavior of showing emails (and having `email`
be the same as `delivery_email`), we use
the new `reset_emails_in_zulip_realm` helper.
A couple random things:
- I fixed any error messages that were leaking
the wrong email
- a test that claimed to rely on the order
of emails no longer does (we sort user_ids
instead)
- we now use user_ids in some place where we used
to use emails
- for IRC mirrors I just punted and used
`reset_emails_in_zulip_realm` in most places
- for MIT-related tests, I didn't fix email
vs. delivery_email unless it was obvious
I also explicitly reset the realm to a "normal"
realm for a couple tests that I frankly just didn't
have the energy to debug. (Also, we do want some
coverage on the normal case, even though it is
"easier" for tests to pass if you mix up `email`
and `delivery_email`.)
In particular, I just reset data for the analytics
and corporate tests.
We now have this API...
If you really just need to log in
and not do anything with the actual
user:
self.login('hamlet')
If you're gonna use the user in the
rest of the test:
hamlet = self.example_user('hamlet')
self.login_user(hamlet)
If you are specifically testing
email/password logins (used only in 4 places):
self.login_by_email(email, password)
And for failures uses this (used twice):
self.assert_login_failure(email)
This specifically fixes an issue where a customer chose monthly payment
plan instead of annual, getting stuck with the higher monthly payments.
With this change, the Customer plan can be set to ENDED and they can go
through /upgrade/ again and choose annual payments.
A proper follow-up should be to make it possible to change between
monthly/annual on the /billing/ page.
Django 2.2.x is the next LTS release after Django 1.11.x; I expect
we'll be on it for a while, as Django 3.x won't have an LTS release
series out for a while.
Because of upstream API changes in Django, this commit includes
several changes beyond requirements and:
* urls: django.urls.resolvers.RegexURLPattern has been replaced by
django.urls.resolvers.URLPattern; affects OpenAPI code and related
features which re-parse Django's internals.
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/28593
* test_runner: Change number to suffix. Django changed the name in this
ticket: https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/28578
* Delete now-unnecessary SameSite cookie code (it's now the default).
* forms: urlsafe_base64_encode returns string in Django 2.2.
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/2.2/ref/utils/#django.utils.http.urlsafe_base64_encode
* upload: Django's File.size property replaces _get_size().
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/2.2/_modules/django/core/files/base/
* process_queue: Migrate to new autoreload API.
* test_messages: Add an extra query caused by .refresh_from_db() losing
the .select_related() on the Realm object.
* session: Sync SessionHostDomainMiddleware with Django 2.2.
There's a lot more we can do to take advantage of the new release;
this is tracked in #11341.
Many changes by Tim Abbott, Umair Waheed, and Mateusz Mandera squashed
are squashed into this commit.
Fixes#10835.
This is a preparatory commit for using isort for sorting all of our
imports, merging changes to files where we can easily review the
changes as something we're happy with.
These are also files with relatively little active development, which
means we don't expect much merge conflict risk from these changes.
Then, find and fix a predictable number of previous misuses.
With a small change by tabbott to preserve backwards compatibility for
sending `yes` for the `forged` field.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
MigrationsTestCase is intentionally omitted from this, since migrations
tests are different in their nature and so whatever setUp()
ZulipTestCase may do in the future, MigrationsTestCase may not
necessarily want to replicate.
This sidesteps tricky escaping issues, and will make it easier to
build a strict Content-Security-Policy.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
Only CustomerPlan.ACTIVE is being used in the code / in production, so don't
need a db migration to move the other CustomerPlan.status constants around.
Previously, when users got a "payment failed" email from Stripe (e.g. if
their card failed on renewal), they would enter in a new card on
/billing#payment-method, and wouldn't find out if the card worked till
Stripe retried the payment 4 days later.
This is a major rewrite of the billing system. It moves subscription
information off of stripe Subscriptions and into a local CustomerPlan
table.
To keep this manageable, it leaves several things unimplemented
(downgrading, etc), and a variety of other TODOs in the code. There are also
some known regressions, e.g. error-handling on /upgrade is broken.
A lot of the seemingly unrelated test fixture changes are because we're
removing a query to stripe in the upgrade path, in cases when the user's
realm has an existing Customer object.
The fixture changes are because self.upgrade formerly used to cause a page load
of /billing, which in turn calls Customer.retrieve.
If we ran the full test suite with GENERATE_STRIPE_FIXTURES=True, we would
likely see several more Customer.retrieve.N.json's being deleted. But
keeping them there for now to keep the diff small.
f52e9d1 ended up not going far enough. Keeping f52e9d1 in place in case we
ever want to go back to that sort of solution.
Also removes the keep argument from test_billing_quantity_changes_end_to_end,
since that test is actually testing the arguments to
stripe.Subscription.save(), not what is returned by Stripe.
Reran every test with GENERATE_STRIPE_FIXTURES = True, which also caused a
few fixtures to get updates unrelated to these changes (likely due to API
updates that hadn't been previously applied).
When we started the billing system we started by following conventions used
in the Stripe documentation, but in hindsight it makes more sense to follow
conventions used in the Zulip codebase.
This used to be a more likely codepath, before we introduced
Customer.has_billing_relationship. It is no longer literally impossible to
hit this race condition, so I'm not deleting the code, but it's unlikely
enough that it's not worth figuring out how to test it.
Already better tested by the upgrade and downgrade tests using mock_stripe.
Note that the line that was removed is actually not possible to reach, since
canceled subscriptions aren't shown on the Customer object.
Also fixes a bug in process_initial_upgrade. If you have a card on file
(e.g. from a previous subscription), and try to upgrade by billing by
invoice, neither the if nor the elif condition applies.
There is no attribute called plan_interval. The reason
this was missed by mypy is moost likely due to us using
Any instead of Subscription in extract_current_subscription.
Steve Howell
Vishnu KS
Mateusz Mandera
rht
Tim Abbott
Anders Kaseorg
Rishi Gupta
Wyatt Hoodes
Greg Price
Anders Kaseorg