So the top navbar is above the left sidebar
on the z-axis, not the y-axis.
So it doesn't make sense to use the top
navbar in calculating the size of the left
sidebar.
It kind of coincidentally works, since these
two numbers are closely related:
left sidebar top margin = 50
navbar height = 40
Calculating `bottom_sidebar_height` correctly
decreases its value by 10.
And then the only value that depends on it
is `stream_filters_max_height`. We were
subtracting out 10 there to make it work,
since `bottom_sidebar_height` was inaccurate
by +10. Now that's fixed.
The comment there was inaccurate--the
`stream_filter` div actually has a bottom
margin of 22px. The bottom margin does
have some consequences for scrolling,
but the main goal here is to make the
calculation return the same value but
be more accurate about what happens
toward the top of the screen.
We have always intended to have 10px of whitespace
below the navbar, and this enforces it directly
and explicitly in the CSS.
Note that the three major panels still should
have a margin of 50px, which is equal to
the safe outer height of the header (40px + 10px).
The name for_stream_name is more appropriate here. The name
for_stream is more suitable for a function that takes in a Stream
object, which we're about to add.
Our hash-naming of production assets interacted badly with the "look
at files in a directory" algorithm used to determine what sound
options exist for the "notification sound" feature. For lack of a
better solution, we fix this by excluding files with an extra `.` in
their name.
Eventually, we'll just make this the default, but for now, we should
fix the typos and use our standing approach for documenting running
management commands.
The border makes the alignment look nicer. Without
a border your eyes plays tricks on you and makes it
seem like numbers are not in the same column.
The border color is the same subtle color as the
backgrounds in others.
Because CSS is annoying, you have to tweak the padding
to make room for the border.
(It should look ok in night mode, too.)
Since the main autoscroll feature was implemeneted, the
maybe_advance_to_recently_sent_message logic had an unfortunate
structure, where the code for this potentially large scroll was
running AFTER the autoscroll decision was made, but before an actual
scroll could have occurred.
This resulted in code that was very difficult to reason about, as
there were 2 potential sources of scrolling when you send a new
message, with little connection between their implementations either
in location or implementation.
Moving this into the main autoscrolling code path clarifies the code,
with the added benefit of fixing a bug where we would report to the
user that they needed to scroll down when in fact we were just about
to scroll the bottom of the feed into view (via
maybe_advance_to_recently_sent_message).
With this change, we never display the "you need to scroll manually"
message in the cast that we just scrolled you there via selecting a
message.
When you just sent a large message, our logic for "you need to scroll"
notifications did not correctly take into account the height of the
compose box. This was easily reproduced when sending very long
messages. The correct solution requires a bit of math to compute what
the visible area will look like after the compose box is closed.
This should be the final fix to #11138.
Extracts out common tests so that future social-auth backends can
be tested without duplicating tests. I have been careful to not
change any testing logic.
This adds a function that controls the whole process of applying
markdown and displaying the markdown rendering preview on request;
This is required to avoid code duplication when adding preview feature
to message-edit UI.
Add all the stop words to page_params, reading from the
`zulip_english.stop` database, with caching to avoid loading the file
on every page load.
Part of #10592.
This causes changing the email_address_visibility field to actually
modify what user_profile.email values are generated for users, both on
user creation and afterwards as email addresses are edited.
The overall feature isn't yet complete, but this brings us pretty close.
The original commit made a number of well-meaning but suboptimal product
changes to the invoice events, such as threading them under the invoice id
rather than the customer id. It also seems to be causing 500s for
invoiceitem events, though I'm not sure why.
This reverts commit 65489b0391.
We had disabled reference style links in bugdown, however,
we hadn't disabled them in marked. This commit rectifies
that and adds test cases for the same.
Fixes#11350.
This helps keep the realm.json small and easy to process; previously,
almost the entire size of that file was the analytics data.
We implement this by refactoring the analytics Config objects into a
separate subroutine that writes to a separate file, plus the
corresponding import code.
Manual testing was performed by exporting the 'analytics' realm, and
importing back to a newly created 'test' realm. The 'test' realm was
then exported and the json files were inspected. The data appeared
consistent with no abnormalities.
Fixes: #11220.
AssertionErrors were raised when attempting to run manual comparison
tests to ensure correctness when exporting the analytics realm using
export_from_config. This was caused by this populate_analytics_db
stream being created without any subscribers, which violates an
invariant.
We fix this by simply subscribing the 'shylock' user to that stream.
Vishnu Ks
Steve Howell
Eeshan Garg
Tim Abbott
Rishi Gupta
butchyyyy
Thomas Ip
Vaibhav
Harshit Bansal
YashRE42
overide
Rohitt Vashishtha
Wyatt Hoodes
vinitS101