This commit adds two user settings, named
* `automatically_follow_topics_policy`
* `automatically_unmute_topics_in_muted_streams_policy`
The settings control the user's preference on which topics they
will automatically 'follow' or 'unmute in muted streams'.
The policies offer four options:
1. Topics I participate in
2. Topics I send a message to
3. Topics I start
4. Never (default)
There is no support for configuring the settings through the UI yet.
This commit renames the 'tornado_redirected_to_list' context
manager to 'capture_send_event_calls' to improve readability.
It also refactors the function to yield a list of events
instead of passing in a list data structure as a parameter
and appending events to it.
This commit updates 'test_user_ids_unmuting_topic' to make
an api_post call to '/api/v1/user_topics' instead of
calling the internal function 'do_set_user_topic_visibility_policy'
to verify the logic.
This commit adds a new endpoint, 'POST /user_topics' which
is used to update the personal preferences for a topic.
Currently, it is used to update the visibility policy of
a user-topic row.
This is a prep commit that renames 'set_topic_mutes' and
'topic_is_muted' to 'set_topic_visibility_policy' and
'topic_has_visibility_policy' respectively, and refactors
them to work with any visibility_policy, not only MUTED.
This commit updates 'set_user_topic_visibility_policy_in_database'
to not raise an error when deleting a UserTopic row and the user
doesn't have a visibility_policy for the topic yet, or when setting
the visibility_policy to its current value.
Also, it includes the changes to not send unnecessary events
in such cases.
This commit replaces 'remove_topic_mute' with
'set_user_topic_visibility_policy_in_database' and
updates it to delete UserTopic row with any configured
visibility_policy and not just muting.
In order to support different types of topic visibility policies,
this renames 'add_topic_mute' to
'set_user_topic_visibility_policy_in_database'
and refactors it to accept a parameter 'visibility_policy'.
Create a corresponding UserTopic row for any visibility policy,
not just muting topics.
When a UserTopic row for (user_profile, stream, topic, recipient_id)
exists already, it updates the row with the new visibility_policy.
In the event of a duplicate request, raises a JsonableError.
i.e., new_visibility_policy == existing_visibility_policy.
There is an increase in the database query count in the message-edit
code path.
Reason:
Earlier, 'add_topic_mute' used 'bulk_create' which either
creates or raises IntegrityError -- 1 query.
Now, 'set_user_topic_visibility_policy' uses get_or_create
-- 2 queries in the case of creating new row.
We can't use the previous approach, because now we have to
handle the case of updating the visibility_policy too.
Also, using bulk_* for a single row is not the correct way.
Co-authored-by: Kartik Srivastava <kaushiksri0908@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Prakhar Pratyush <prakhar841301@gmail.com>
This commit refactors the existing pattern (real-time usage)
used to assert 'date_muted' in tests.
A fixed value is used at the start of the test to
assert 'date_muted', replacing the timedelta or real-time usage pattern.
Replaces 'do_unmute_topic' with 'do_set_user_topic_visibility_policy'
and associated minor changes.
This change is made to align with the plan to use a single function
'do_set_user_topic_visibility_policy' to manage
user_topic - visibility_policy changes and corresponding event
generation.
This commit is a step in the direction of having a common
function to handle visibility_policy changes and event
generation instead of separate functions for each
visibility policy.
In order to support different types of topic visibility policies,
this renames 'do_topic_mute' to 'do_set_user_topic_visibility_policy'
and refactors it to accept a parameter 'visibility_policy'.
The "add_topic_mute" and "remove_topic_mute" library functions
shouldn't be called directly from tests.
They should instead call "do_mute_topic" and "do_unmute_topic"
The reason being:
Library functions are meant to be internal interfaces
for just changing the database, and shouldn't generally be
called elsewhere.
This makes use of the new case insensitive UNIQUE index added in the
earlier commit. With that index present, we can now rely solely on the
database to correctly identify duplicates and throw integrity errors as
required.
Anders Kaseorg
Vector73
Prakhar Pratyush
Abhijeet Prasad Bodas
Kartik Srivastava