All instances of `choice` have been replaced with `option` in the UI
for editing a poll. In code, `option` was already being used. This
ensures the same terminology is used across the code, the UI and the
related help center article.
This reverses the policy that was set, but incompletely enforced, by
commit 951514dd7d. The self-closing tag
syntax is clearer, more consistent, simpler to parse, compatible with
XML, preferred by Prettier, and (most importantly now) required by
FormatJS.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Steve asked me to remove this, since the tictactoe game was always
intended as a proof of concept. Now that we have poll and todo
widgets, the sample code for tictactoe has much less value.
We replace the content and type in test_widgets.py to maintain
coverage.
We now prevent these variations:
* <hr/>
* <hr />
* <br/>
* <br />
We could enforce similar consistency for other void
tags, if we wished, but these two are particularly
prevalent.
The todo_widget was using the using a counter to store the key value of
every task. This would cause assiging multiple tasks the same key value
in a race condition. To avoid this we make "sender_id" a part of the key
along with the counter.
Also the `key` now not being a integer value, we can't use it to find the
index of the task using it. Thus, a function is made that will find the
index of task whose key is sent by the user to strike.
The user can pass description along with the task name by splitting the input string with hyphen.
Eg: Task Title - Task Description
todo_list: Add index numbers to task.
Add a background highlight to vote count button if currently
logged in user votes on that option.
Tweaked by tabbott to use better variable names and Rishi for better
styling.
We had initially designed the poll widget like a blog
post with comments beneath it but it makes more sense
to think of it as just a simple poll with options.
NOTE: If you revert this commit, you want to revert
the immediately prior commit as well. The history
is that Ishan made some improvements to the widget,
but there were some minor bugs. I decided not
to squash the commits together so that the git
history is clear who did what. (In particular, I
want questions about the JS code to come to me if
somebody does `git blame`.)
Anyway...
This is a fairly significant rewrite of the polling
widget, where I clean up the overall structure of
the code (including things from before the prior
fix) and try to polish the prior commit a bit as
well.
There are a few new features:
* We tell "other" users to wait for the poll
to start (if there's no question yet).
* We tip the author to say "/poll foo" (as
needed).
* We add edit controls for the question.
* We don't allow new choices until there's
a question.
The user can also edit the question after adding it.
The question in the poll can only be added/edited
by the user who started the poll.
The input bar will be disabled for the other users
if the question is not yet added. If the question is
added, the input bar will not be visible to the other
users.
These styles aren't great, but they're hopefully
better than none at all and inspire a follow up
commit from somebody else (so it starts to look
like a "real" feature instead of feeling completely
proof-of-concept).
A "zform" knows how to render data that follows our
schema for widget messages with form elements like
buttons and choices.
This code won't be triggered until a subsequent
server-side commit takes widget_content from
API callers such as the trivial chat bot and
creates submessages for us.
N-Shar-ma
SantamRC
Sahil Batra
Steve Howell
Manan Rathi
Anders Kaseorg
YashRE42
Steve Howell
majordwarf
Anders Kaseorg
varunvaruns9
Rohitt Vashishtha
ishanrai05
Tim Abbott
Rhea Parekh