Previously, the assignee message would stick around in the middle of the
event message. This doesn't look as good as if we put it to the end of
the event message. These changes does just that and move the assignee
messages towards the end of the event message to make it look better
and cleaner for the readers.
This is a follow up to #24673, we want to modify every webhook events to
follow the same pattern and consistency where branch name should only
show on opened and merged events.
7 characters are not enough for large projects, so we change
it to reasonably longer. As an example, The Linux kernel needs
at least 11 characters of sha in its shortened form to identify
a revision. We pick 11 so it should work for most of the projects.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Since FIXTURE_DIR_NAME is the name of the folder that contains the view
and tests modules of the webhook and another folder called "fixtures" that
store the fixtures, it is more appropriate to call it WEBHOOK_DIR_NAME,
especially when we want to refer to the view module using this variable.
Previously, the GitLab webhook code, namely the `get_objects_assignee`
method first tried to get a single assignee and if that failed then it
looks for multiple assignees and then it would return the first
assignee that it found (there's actually a code smell here - a loop
which would always return on the first iteration).
Instead, this commit will change that behavior to first check for
multiple assignees first then for a single assignee if we can't find
multiple assignees. Ultimately it will return a list of all of the
assignees (however many that might be [0, n]). This method has then
aptly been renamed to `get_assignees`.
Finally, we tweked the code using this method to always use it's
output as an "assignees" parameter to templates (there's also an
assignee parameter which we want to avoid here for consistency).
Signed-off-by: Hemanth V. Alluri <hdrive1999@gmail.com>
Almost all webhook tests use this helper, except a few
webhooks that write to private streams.
Being concise is important here, and the name
`self.send_and_test_stream_message` always confused
me, since it sounds you're sending a stream message,
and it leaves out the webhook piece.
We should consider renaming `send_and_test_private_message`
to something like `check_webhook_private`, but I couldn't
decide on a great name, and it's very rarely used. So
for now I just made sure the docstrings of the two
sibling functions reference each other.
Since the title of a merge request can often change, it shouldn't be a
part of the topic that we send the message to. Otherwise things would
get messy and confusing.
But at the same time we don't want to make this mandatory. So we add
a new boolean GET parameter that can toggle whether or not the topic
should include the MR title (`use_merge_request_title`).
Fixes#15951.
Signed-off-by: Hemanth V. Alluri <hdrive1999@gmail.com>
Automatically generated by the following script, based on the output
of lint with flake8-comma:
import re
import sys
last_filename = None
last_row = None
lines = []
for msg in sys.stdin:
m = re.match(
r"\x1b\[35mflake8 \|\x1b\[0m \x1b\[1;31m(.+):(\d+):(\d+): (\w+)", msg
)
if m:
filename, row_str, col_str, err = m.groups()
row, col = int(row_str), int(col_str)
if filename == last_filename:
assert last_row != row
else:
if last_filename is not None:
with open(last_filename, "w") as f:
f.writelines(lines)
with open(filename) as f:
lines = f.readlines()
last_filename = filename
last_row = row
line = lines[row - 1]
if err in ["C812", "C815"]:
lines[row - 1] = line[: col - 1] + "," + line[col - 1 :]
elif err in ["C819"]:
assert line[col - 2] == ","
lines[row - 1] = line[: col - 2] + line[col - 1 :].lstrip(" ")
if last_filename is not None:
with open(last_filename, "w") as f:
f.writelines(lines)
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
Generated by pyupgrade --py36-plus --keep-percent-format, but with the
NamedTuple changes reverted (see commit
ba7906a3c6, #15132).
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
mock is just a backport of the standard library’s unittest.mock now.
The SAMLAuthBackendTest change is needed because
MagicMock.call_args.args wasn’t introduced until Python
3.8 (https://bugs.python.org/issue21269).
The PROVISION_VERSION bump is skipped because mock is still an
indirect dev requirement via moto.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Apparently, the change and test I added before didn't quite cover the
corner case that was broken. This does, and exposes a second bug as
well, which we fix.
Generated by `pyupgrade --py3-plus --keep-percent-format` on all our
Python code except `zthumbor` and `zulip-ec2-configure-interfaces`,
followed by manual indentation fixes.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
This is a follow-up in response to Tim's comments on #9951.
In instances where all messages from a Gitlab integration are
grouped under one user specified topic (specified in the URL), we
should include the title of the issue/MR in the message body, since
the availability of a user-specified topic precludes us from
including it in the topic itself (which was the default behaviour).
We already include the issue title in the topic. But if one chooses
to group all gitlab notifications under one topic, the message body
is misleading in the sense that only the Issue ID and the description
are displayed, not the title, which isn't super helpful if the topic
doesn't tell you the title either.
I think we should err on the side of always including the title in
the main message body, which is what this commit does.
Fixes#9913.
We filter out hidden comments out of Issue descriptions but this
breaks when description is null (which is unusual). So this commit
just checks to see if the description is None and if so, not to
filter anything out.
These are the straightforward ones.
Note that there is a line in zerver.lib.test_classes.build_webhook_url
that lost test coverage. That's because most of our tests test using
stream messages so the webhook URLs being tested always have a query
parameter. So the line that accounts for there being no query
parameters never gets called, which is fine, but we should still
keep it.
GitLab recently changed their event name for build notifications
from "Build Hook" to "Job Hook". Instead of just supporting the
latter, we should support both just in case people are running
older versions of GitLab.
At some point, GitLab decided to change the name of the event for
CI notifications from "Build Hook" to "Job Hook" and we started
running into errors in webhook-logger.log.
Such payloads are generated when a GitLab repository has merge
request approvals enabled and a project member approves a merge
request. Approving is not the same as merging.
Payloads that don't have a payload['object_attributes']['action']
attribute are generated when GitLab sends a test payload to verify
if the webhook was set up successfully. In this case, we should
send a message notifying that the webhook was configured
successfully.
Satyam Bansal
Joelute
Anders Kaseorg
Zixuan James Li
PIG208
Hemanth V. Alluri
Steve Howell
Anders Kaseorg
Johannes Hochreiter
Tim Abbott
pemontto
Tim Abbott
Eeshan Garg
Anders Kaseorg
Steve Howell
Aditya Bansal
neiljp (Neil Pilgrim)
Xavier Cooney