We don't need to check whether the user exists before creating it:
CREATE USER failing is fine.
(imported from commit e8b2bc5495e328ee30d15445a566c0edff2f069d)
If we run provision.py a second time, there will already be
zulip/zulip_test users, so the CREATE USER will fail and the password
won't get updated to the newly generated value. By creating the user
and setting the password in two commands, we allow the creation to
fail without affecting whether the password is set.
Also the quoting for updating .pgpass was wrong.
(imported from commit 5e249813c17cb4829e4e4958e92aaa30563c5f96)
Source LOCAL_DATABASE_PASSWORD and INITIAL_PASSWORD_SALT from the secrets file.
Fix the creation of pgpass file.
Tim's note: This will definitely break the original purpose of the
tool but it should be pretty easy to add that back as an option.
(imported from commit 8ab31ea2b7cbc80a4ad2e843a2529313fad8f5cf)
The production database has a public schema. I thought we had dropped it, but
apparently not. We should match what exists in prod either way.
(imported from commit 1bf956360029ebbd59afc3cc30fca9a859343adf)
We do this by creating a new zulip{_test}_base database that only has the zulip
schema and the tsearch_extras extension. We then use that as a template when
creating zulip{_test}.
(imported from commit 8adb4b98410e4042a0187902e89c99561eac8c8f)
postgres-init-db was expecting to be located two directories below the
project root. It is only one directory below the root of the project so
remove a set of .. .
(imported from commit 228b47ac2539caf2b6cd12a1b5f399534cf0c866)
This commit must be simultaneously deployed on both staging and
prod0. It also requires completely taking down the app.
To deploy these changes, do:
* check out this commit at /root/zulip on postgres0, postgres1, staging, and prod0
* stop the process_fts_updates job on postgres0 and postgres1
* stop the app on staging and prod0
* do a puppet apply on postgres0, postgres1, staging, and prod0
* move the new client certificates into place on staging and app
* move the new server certificates into place on postgres0 and postgres1
* reload the database config on postgres0 and postgres1 (this might
actually require a restart)
* run tools/migrate-db on postgres0 as root
* do a deploy through this commit on staging and prod0
* start the process_fts_updates job on postgres0 and postgres1
* do a puppet apply on nagios
(imported from commit 819bdd14326c1425e2d3041a491a8ca3b9716506)
Currently our test database is backed by sqlite; this commit moves
us to using postgres for our all database needs. This, in conjunction
with the patched django on github, allow us to have fewer hacks and
more true-to-life tests. It also sets the stage for testing the bulk_create
and schema search_path patches made to django.
Developers will need to run:
./tools/postgres-init-test-db
./tools/do-destroy-rebuild-test-database
this is assuming that they have already run:
./tools/postgres-init-db
./tools/do-destroy-rebuild-database
at some point on this pg_cluster. (The ordering is important; it will other-
wise complain about the south_migration table).
(imported from commit c56c6f27e13df7ae10b2e643e65d669dde61af3d)
Reid Barton
Cat Miller
Zev Benjamin
Jason Michalski
Tim Abbott
Tim Abbott
acrefoot
Leo Franchi
Luke Faraone