user_profile.id was confused for user_profile.recipient_id. These bugs
are particularly sneaky as they can go undetected by tests due to ids of
objects accidentally coinciding. We add a mitigation for this class of
mistakes by shifting the Recipient.id sequence in test db.
This was introduced in dda3ff41e1.
On the rare occasion where user_profile.id would coincide with
recipient_id passed to the function, we would return the wrong value.
That is, instead of correctly returning recipient_id, we would return
sender.recipient_id - recipient id of the sender of the message, thus
possibly returning user_profile.recipient_id (if user_profile is the
sender) - exactly the situation the function wanted to avoid
with the `if recipient_id == my_recipient_id:` if. Ultimately resulting
in incorrect/malformed data in
state['raw_recent_private_conversations'].
nlargest is the natural fit for selecting n biggest items
from an unsorted list. It's more readable as well as more
efficent (even though we don't care much about the efficeny
in this particular case).
The current logic doesn't display data types when the additionalProperties
variables are not object, but are array of strings, etc. Changed the if
condition to allow rendering in such cases.
zerver/lib/users.py has a function named access_user_by_id, which is
used in /users views to fetch a user by it's id. Along with fetching
the user this function also does important validations regarding
checking of required permissions for fetching the target user.
In an attempt to solve the above problem this commit introduces
following changes:
1. Make all the parameters except user_profile, target_user_id
to be keyword only.
2. Use for_admin parameter instead of read_only.
3. Adds a documentary note to the function describing the reason for
changes along with recommended way to call this function in future.
4. Changes in views and tests to call this function in this changed
format.
Changes were tested using ./tools/test-backend.
Fixes#17111.
Previously, the data type of responses wasn't displayed in the API
Documentation, even though that OpenAPI data is carefully validated
against the implementation. Here we add a recursive function to
render the data types visibly in API Documentation.
Fixes part of #15967.
Commit 434094e599 (#11321) changed this
from an Extension to a subclass of Markdown, so it no longer has any
reason to use a config dict structured like that of an Extension.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This isn't quite the right model, because we're not actually going
through the upload code path, but it does at least provide some inline
image previews in the data.
Fixes part of #14991.
The changes are as follows:
• Fix one day offset in all western zones.
• Correct CST from -64800 to -21600 and CDT from -68400 to -18000.
• Disambiguate PST in favor of -28000 over +28000.
• Add GMT, UTC, WET, previously excluded for being at offset 0.
• Add ACDT, AEDT, AKST, MET, MSK, NST, NZDT, PKT, which the previous
code did not find.
• Remove numbered abbreviations -12, …, +14, which are unnecessary.
• Remove MSD and PKST, which are no longer used.
Hardcode the dict and verify it with a test, so that future
discrepancies won’t go silently unnoticed.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.1/releases/3.1/
- django.contrib.postgres.fields.JSONField is deprecated and should be
replaced with models.JSONField
- The internals of the implementation in the postgresql backend have
changed a bit in
f48f671223
and thus we need to make an ugly tweak in test_runner.
- app_directories.Loader.get_dirs() now returns a list of PosixPath so
we need to make a small tweak in TwoFactorLoader for that (PosixPath
is not iterable)
Fixes#16010.
This commit updates the Zulip User-Agent to
'Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; ZulipURLPreview/{version}; +{external_host})'
as the older User-Agent was rendering Markdown YouTube titles as
'YouTube - YouTube'.
Fixes#16970.
c2526844e9 removed the `signups` queue
worker, and the command-line tool that enqueues to it -- but not the
automated process that enqueues during signups itself.
Remove the signup, since it is no longer in use.
Previously, the data type of parameters wasn't displayed in the API
Documentation, even though that OpenAPI data is carefully validated
against the implementation. Here we add a recursive function to
render the data types visibly in the API documentation.
This only covers the request parameters; we'll want to do something
similar for response parameters in a follow-up PR.
Fixes part of #15967.
When we were getting an apply_event call for
a subscription/add event, we were trying not to
mutate the event itself, but this clumsy code
was still mutating the actual event:
# Avoid letting 'subscribers' entries end up in the list
for i, sub in enumerate(event['subscriptions']):
event['subscriptions'][i] = \
copy.deepcopy(event['subscriptions'][i])
del event['subscriptions'][i]['subscribers']
This is only a theoretical bug.
The only person who receives a subscription/add
event is the current user.
And it wouldn't have affected the current user,
since the apply_event was correctly updating the
state, and we wouldn't actually deliver the event
to the client (because the whole point of apply_event
is to prevent us from having to piggyback the
super-recent events on to our payload or put
them into the event queue and possibly race).
The new code just cleanly makes a copy of each
sub, if necessary, as we add them to state["subscriptions"].
And I updated the event schemas to reflect that
subscribers is always present in subscription/add
event.
Long term we should probably avoid sending subscribers
on this event when the clients don't set something
like include_subscribers. That's a fairly complicated
fix that involves passing in flags to ClientDescriptor.
Alternatively, we could just say that our policy is
that we never send subscribers there, but we instead
use peer_add events. See issue #17089 for more
details.
It's always cleaner to work in id space. It probably
would have required a perfect storm to have broken
the existing code, but using ids is obviously more
robust in theory, and just as simple.
We now require keywords, so that there is no
pitfall for mixing up boolean parameters.
Positional parameters are basically evil
when you have a bunch of bools.
I also make user_profile the first argument.
Finally, the code is more diff-friendly.
I eliminate the defaults, since the existing code
was already specificying values for most things.
I move all the booleans to the bottom for both
parameters and arguments.
I require explicit keywords for everything but
user_profile (which is now first).
And, finally, I format the code in a more
diff-friendly manner.
We eliminate some redundant checks.
We also consistently provide a `subscribers` field
in our stream data with `[]`, even if our users
can't access subscribers. We therefore bump
the API version and tweak the docs. (See further
down for a detailed justification of the change.)
Even though it is sometimes fine to have redundant code
that is defensive in nature, some upcoming changes are gonna
move subscriber-related logic out of build_stream_dict_for_sub
for certain codepaths as part of our effort to streamline
the payload for subscribers within page_params.
So we can't rely on the code that I removed here
inside of build_stream_dict_for_sub.
Anyway, it makes more sense to do these checks explicitly
in the validate function.
The code in build_stream_dict_for_sub was almost effectively
a noop, since the validation function was already preventing
us from getting subscriber info. The only difference it
made was sometimes converting `[]` to `None`, and then
subsequently omitting the subscribers field.
Neither ZT nor the webapp make any distinction between
`[]` or <missing key> for the `subscribers` data in
`page_params`.
The webapp has had this code for a long time (and now
equivalent code elsewhere in this PR):
if (!Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(sub, "subscribers")) {
sub.subscribers = new LazySet([]);
}
The webapp calculates access based on booleans, anyway:
sub.can_access_subscribers =
page_params.is_admin || sub.subscribed ||
(!page_params.is_guest && !sub.invite_only);
And ZT would choke if `subscribers` were missing, except that
it never gets to the relevant code due to other checks:
def get_other_subscribers_in_stream(<snip>):
assert stream_id is not None or stream_name is not None
if stream_id:
assert self.is_user_subscribed_to_stream(stream_id)
return [sub
for sub in self.stream_dict[stream_id]['subscribers']
if sub != self.user_id]
else:
return [sub
for _, stream in self.stream_dict.items()
for sub in stream['subscribers']
if stream['name'] == stream_name
if sub != self.user_id]
You could make a semantic argument that we should prefer
<missing key> to `[]` when subscribers aren't even available, but
we have precedent from the way that `bulk_get_subscriber_user_ids`
has traditionally populated its result:
result: Dict[int, List[int]] =
{stream["id"]: [] for stream in stream_dicts}
If we changed `stream_dicts` to `target_stream_dicts` we
would faciliate a move toward `None`, but it would just cause
headaches for other server code as well as the frontends
(which, to reiterate, already prefer the empty array
for convenience).
As my comment indicates, I would prefer to handle
this explicitly by raising JsonableError in an
else statement here, but it's not a big deal.
This function can probably be simplified with a
bit of work, mostly on the testing side to make
sure we are covering all edge cases, but that
is out of the scope of my current PR.
By moving the relevant logic from realm.get_bot_domain to
get_fake_email_domain we will make realm.host be used (if possible) for
dummy user addresses. That is, instead of user11@zulipchat.com, the
address will become user11@subdomain.zulipchat.com.
We often send only one field (away or status_text)
to be updated.
So we have to make our schema support optional
keys.
As a result of the more flexible schema, we no
longer need to exempt the node fixtures from
our schema checks.
Since recipient_id (id of the PERSONAL Recipient of the user) was
denormalized into the UserProfile model, this query can be simplified by
getting rid of the zerver_recipient JOIN.
This makes us more efficient when handling
multiple users. We don't have to keep
sending the same two queries to the database.
Note that as part of this we eliminated
a failure mode for the obscure population
of users from whom both `user.is_guest` and
`user.can_access_public_streams()` returns
False. We know this would have only affected
Zephyr users (by looking at the code), and
we know we don't actually process Zephyr
users for email digests (or else we would
have raised exceptions in the old code).
We mostly need realm_id, but when we go to build
message lists, we need realm.uri.
We could probably be more aggresive about using
`only` here, but for now I am just trying to
reduce hops to the database.
Mateusz Mandera
Vishnu KS
Suyash Vardhan Mathur
Alex Vandiver
Steve Howell
Anders Kaseorg
m-e-l-u-h-a-n
Aman Agrawal
Ganesh Pawar
akshatdalton
Tim Abbott