This commit adds related_name parameter to UserGroup.direct_members
such that we can use direct_groups instead of the default
usergroupmembership_set for getting all the groups of which the
user is direct member.
This commit also sets related_name of UserGroupMembership.user_group
and UserGroupMembership.user_profile to "+" which means that we will
not be having backward relations for these. This change is correct
since we would need to use the recursive queries to get all the
groups of a user and all the members of a group after we add the
subgroups concept in next commit. This leads to us using direct_members
field of UserGroup instead of usergroupmembership_set in mention code,
but this will soon be replaced with the recursive query function to
include subgroup's members as well.
Extracted this commit from #19866.
Authored-by : Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This commit renames members field of UserGroup to direct_members
for better readability because in the new permissions model, a
user group can be a sub-group of another group and thus technically
members of sub-group will also be members of that group.
This is a prep commit for new permissions model.
Extracted this commit from #19866.
Co-authored-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This will be useful to let users enable/disable
sharing read receipts once we add that feature.
Note: Added "I've" to IGNORED_PHRASES in
tools/lib/capitalization.py to avoid capitalization
errors for the label text of this setting.
Note: These are not functional in enabling/disabling sending of
typing notifications with this commit.
Refactored the privacy settings update to keep the code less
duplicated along with making the addition of new settings easier.
This commit adds can_create_web_public_streams helper
in models.py which will be used to validate whether
user is allowed to create a web-public stream or not.
This commit also adds the checks for Realm.POLICY_OWNERS_ONLY
in check_has_permission_policies.
This commit adds create_web_public_stream_policy
field to Realm table which controls the roles that
can create web-public streams and by default its
value is set to POLICY_OWNERS_ONLY.
Zulip attempts to validate that the regular expressions that admins
enter for linkifiers are well-formatted, and only contain a specific
subset of regex grammar. The process of checking these
properties (via a regex!) can cause denial-of-service via
backtracking.
Furthermore, this validation itself does not prevent the creation of
linkifiers which themselves cause denial-of-service when they are
executed. As the validator accepts literally anything inside of a
`(?P<word>...)` block, any quadratic backtracking expression can be
hidden therein.
Switch user-provided linkifier patterns to be matched in the Markdown
processor by the `re2` library, which is guaranteed constant-time.
This somewhat limits the possible features of the regular
expression (notably, look-head and -behind, and back-references);
however, these features had never been advertised as working in the
context of linkifiers.
A migration removes any existing linkifiers which would not function
under re2, after printing them for posterity during the upgrade; they
are unlikely to be common, and are impossible to fix automatically.
The denial-of-service in the linkifier validator was discovered by
@erik-krogh and @yoff, as GHSL-2021-118.
Users wanted a feature where they could specify
which users can create public streams and which users can
create private streams.
This splits stream creation code into two parts,
public and private stream creation.
Fixes#17009.
This commit replaces 'allow_message_deleting' boolean setting
with an integer setting 'delete_own_message_policy'. We have a
separate dropdown now for deciding which user-roles can delete
messages sent by themselves and the time-limit setting droddown
is different.
This new setting has two options - everyone and admins only. Other
options including moderators will be added further.
We also remove the "Never" option from the original time-limit
dropdown, as admins are always allowed to delete message. This
never option resembled the case of only admins being allowed to
delete but this state is now resembled by setting the dropdown
to "admins only" and we also disable the time-limit dropdown in
this case as admins are allowed to delete irrespective of limit.
Note, this setting is only for deleting messages sent by the
deleting user themselves, and only admins are allowed to delete
messages sent by others as before.
We make zero invalid value for message_content_delete_limit_seconds and
for handling the case of "Allow to delete message any time", the API-level
value of message_content_delete_limit_seconds is "anytime" and "None"
as the DB-level value. We also use these values for message retention
setting, so it helps maintain consistency.
This is a somewhat subtle function, that deserves a few comments
explaining subtle details of its logic, and there's no good reason to
have multiple copies of that logic that are slightly inconsistent.
Because the main changes here are just checking for invariant
failures, the behavioral change here should be limited to ensuring
deactivated streams are not considered available even if they were
tagged as web public streams before deactivation.
This commit removes the existing default_twenty_four_hour_time field in
Realm table which was used to set the twenty_four_hour_time setting of
new user on joining and instead we now use the twenty_four_hour_time
field of RealmUserDefault table for the same.
With some tweaks by tabbott to clarify the documentation.
These values are currently either a string already or a List[int]. We
should do the conversion in
do_update_user_custom_profile_data_if_changed properly: if the value is
already a string, it can be used directly - if it's not, orjson.dumps is
a more future-proof way of converting than str(). Using orjson.dumps
here also allows us to change the converter of the USER type
CustomProfileField to orjson.loads, which is nicer to have than
ast.literal_eval.
While orjson.dumps() and str() give the same output when
given the special case of List[int],
ast.literal_eval was previously used due to orjson.loads not being
a good inverse function to str in general. That gets straightened out
now.
None of the existing custom profile field types have the value as an
integer like declared in many places - nor is it a string like currently
decalred in types.py. The correct type is Union[str, List[int]]. Rather
than tracking this in so many places throughout the codebase, we add a
new ProfileDataElementValue type and insert it where appropriate.
This new setting both serves as a guard to allow us to merge API
support for web public streams to main before we're ready for this
feature to be available on Zulip Cloud, and also long term will
protect self-hosted servers from accidentally enabling web-public
streams (which could be a scary possibility for the administrators of
a corporate Zulip server).
This is a follow-up to #19388.
We will in the future allow patch requests to change the visibility
of an existing topic, so `last_updated` is better name for this field.
This commit does not affect the API or events in any way, but only the
database.
Now, when we add a custom animated emoji to the realm
we also save a still image of it (1st frame of the gif). So
we can avoid showing an animated emoji every time.
This extends the invite api endpoints to handle an extra
argument, expiration duration, which states the number of
days before the invitation link expires.
For prereg users, expiration info is attached to event
object to pass it to invite queue processor in order to
create and send confirmation link.
In case of multiuse invites, confirmation links are
created directly inside do_create_multiuse_invite_link(),
For filtering valid user invites, expiration info stored in
Confirmation object is used, which is accessed by a prereg
user using reverse generic relations.
Fixes#16359.
This commit adds do_set_realm_user_default_setting which
will be used to change the realm-level defaults of settings
for new users.
We also add a new event type "realm_user_settings_defaults"
for these settings and a "realm_user_settings_default" object
in '/register' response containing all the realm-level default
settings.
This was likely initiall created with null=True in
5c5ffd6ea3 just because we didn't have a
plan for backfilling this field, but I verified that Zulip Cloud has
no realms without a name set, and that's the place most likely to have
any form of super-legacy nameless realms.
So we can clean up this aspect of the data model without a special
migration to do something with existing realms with name=None (which I
suspect would have resulted in a 500 anyway).
This fixes a regression where one could end up deactivating all owners
of a realm when trying to synchronize LDAP with the `is_realm_admin`
flag configured in `AUTH_LDAP_USER_FLAGS_BY_GROUP`.
With tweaks by tabbott to add is_moderator as well.
Fixes#18677.
Since 84742a0, all settings are sent in the `user_settings` dictionary
which were previously sent inline with other fields in /register
response.
In order to simplify the process of adding new personal settings, we
want to transition to a world where new settings only need to consider
the `property_types` object, and code that needs to reference the
legacy behavior interacts with an object with `legacy` in its name.
This way, contributors working on new settings don't need to think
about the legacy code paths at all.
See https://chat.zulip.org/#narrow/stream/378-api-design/topic/user.20settings.20response.20in.20.2Fregister
to understand this better.
We move the emojiset_choices method from UserProfile class to
UserBaseSettings class because emojiset_choices exists in
UserBaseSettings class and this would be used for realm-level
settings as well along with existing user-level settings.
The `user_activity_interval` worker calls:
```python3
last = UserActivityInterval.objects.filter(user_profile=user_profile).order_by("-end")[0]
`````
Which results in a query like:
```sql
SELECT "zerver_useractivityinterval"."id", "zerver_useractivityinterval"."user_profile_id", "zerver_useractivityinterval"."start", "zerver_useractivityinterval"."end" FROM "zerver_useractivityinterval" WHERE "zerver_useractivityinterval"."user_profile_id" = 12345 ORDER BY "zerver_useractivityinterval"."end" DESC LIMIT 1
```
For users which have at least one matching row, this results in a
query plan like:
```
Limit (cost=0.56..711.38 rows=1 width=24) (actual time=0.078..0.078 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Index Scan Backward using zerver_useractivityinterval_7f021a14 on zerver_useractivityinterval (cost=0.56..1031399.46 rows=1451 width=24) (actual time=0.077..0.078 rows=1 loops=1)
Filter: (user_profile_id = 12345)
Rows Removed by Filter: 98
Planning Time: 0.059 ms
Execution Time: 0.088 ms
```
But for users that have just been created, with no matching rows, this
is considerably more expensive:
```
Limit (cost=0.56..711.38 rows=1 width=24) (actual time=10798.146..10798.146 rows=0 loops=1)
-> Index Scan Backward using zerver_useractivityinterval_7f021a14 on zerver_useractivityinterval (cost=0.56..1031399.46 rows=1451 width=24) (actual time=10798.145..10798.145 rows=0 loops=1)
Filter: (user_profile_id = 12345)
Rows Removed by Filter: (count of every single row in the table, redacted)
Planning Time: 0.053 ms
Execution Time: 10798.158 ms
```
Regular vacuuming can force the use of the index on `user_profile_id`
as long as there are few enough users, which is fast -- however, at
some point, the query planner decides that is insufficiently specific,
always chooses the effective-whole-table-scan.
Add an index on `(user_profile_id, end)`, which is expected to be
sufficiently specific that it is used even with large numbers of user
profiles.
Ref #19250.
These changes are all independent of each other; I just didn’t feel
like making dozens of commits for them.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This commit updates both the stream-level and realm-level message
retention setting to use 'unlimited' instead of 'forever' to set
message retention setting to "retain messages forever".
Previously, we checked for the `enable_offline_email_notifications` and
`enable_offline_push_notifications` settings (which determine whether the
user will receive notifications for PMs and mentions) just before sending
notifications. This has a few problem:
1. We do not have access to all the user settings in the notification
handlers (`handle_missedmessage_emails` and `handle_push_notifications`),
and therefore, we cannot correctly determine whether the notification should
be sent. Checks like the following which existed previously, will, for
example, incorrectly not send notifications even when stream email
notifications are enabled-
```
if not receives_offline_email_notifications(user_profile):
return
```
With this commit, we simply do not enqueue notifications if the "offline"
settings are disabled, which fixes that bug.
Additionally, this also fixes a bug with the "online push notifications"
feature, which was, if someone were to:
* turn off notifications for PMs and mentions (`enable_offline_push_notifications`)
* turn on stream push notifications (`enable_stream_push_notifications`)
* turn on "online push" (`enable_online_push_notifications`)
then, they would still receive notifications for PMs when online.
This isn't how the "online push enabled" feature is supposed to work;
it should only act as a wrapper around the other notification settings.
The buggy code was this in `handle_push_notifications`:
```
if not (
receives_offline_push_notifications(user_profile)
or receives_online_push_notifications(user_profile)
):
return
// send notifications
```
This commit removes that code, and extends our `notification_data.py` logic
to cover this case, along with tests.
2. The name for these settings is slightly misleading. They essentially
talk about "what to send notifications for" (PMs and mentions), and not
"when to send notifications" (offline). This commit improves this condition
by restricting the use of this term only to the database field, and using
clearer names everywhere else. This distinction will be important to have
non-confusing code when we implement multiple options for notifications
in the future as dropdown (never/when offline/when offline or online, etc).
3. We should ideally re-check all notification settings just before the
notifications are sent. This is especially important for email notifications,
which may be sent after a long time after the message was sent. We will
in the future add code to thoroughly re-check settings before sending
notifications in a clean manner, but temporarily not re-checking isn't
a terrible scenario either.
Part of #19272
We still keep refering to this model with "MutedTopic" to reduce the
diff size of this commit. The alias will be removed in the next commit.
This commit skips on renaming the `date_muted` field to something more
general. That will be done in further commits, along with the code and
API changes.
Vishnu KS
Mateusz Mandera
Anders Kaseorg
Sahil Batra
Dinesh
Eeshan Garg
Alex Vandiver
Ganesh Pawar
sahil839
Tim Abbott
Abhijeet Prasad Bodas
Aman Agrawal
Riken Shah
shanukun
Wesley Aptekar-Cassels
Shelly
Hemanth V. Alluri