The dictionary result for get_user_info_for_message_updates()
now has a `mention_user_ids` field that is a set of user ids
who were mentioned in a message.
This checks what arguments it passes into the enqueuing function.
Note, however, that the arguments are wrong for various cases, we'll
update the tests as we fix those bugs.
This ensures that as we expand the logic for under what circumstances
email and push notifications should be sent, we can be confident about
this code path always doing the right thing.
This fixes a problem introduced in the recent refactoring where
`triggers` would not be set correctly when a push or email
notification was triggered by missedmessage_hook.
Fixes#6612.
Now, the two code paths do the same thing for this check.
It seems like there may be more work to do here, in that
wildcard_mentioned messages seem to not be eligible for sending
email/push notifications. We probably want to add some logic there
for the user doing the mention to control whether or not it does.
This makes GoogleSubdomainLoginTest consistently access subdomains the
standard way, replacing the original hacky approach it had that
predated the library.
There are several reasons to extract this function:
* It's easy to unit test without extensive mocking.
* It will show up when we profile code.
* It is something that you can mostly ignore for
most messages.
The main reason to extract this, though, is that we are about
to do some fairly complex splicing of data for the use case
of mentioning service bots on streams they are not subscribed to,
and we want to localize the complexity.
It's unlikely to be of any real consequence, but this code bugged me
in that it makes a whole set before throwing it away to make nearly
the same set.
Sadly Python's comprehensions lack a way to write these cleanly as one
comprehension; but with no extra code complexity we can make the
temporary a genexp, which does the job.
We need a migration to clear the tutorial_status for existing users,
so that we don't show hotspots to anyone who signed up for Zulip in
the month or so since we deleted the old tutorial.
This fixes a bug where the internal_prep_message code path would
incorrectly ignore the `realm` that was passed into it. As a result,
attempts to send messages using the system bots with this code path
would crash.
As a sidenote, we really need to make our test system consistent with
production in terms of whether the user's realm is the same as the
system realm.
We don't access any attributes of the sender other than the realm, and
as it turns out, we in some cases want to use a different realm than
the sender's.
Vishnu Ks
Vaida Plankyte
Steve Howell
Tim Abbott
rht
Robert Hönig
Eeshan Garg
Alena Volkova
neiljp (Neil Pilgrim)
Greg Price
Rishi Gupta
hollywoodno