There was really no reason for this to be a nested function, since
we weren't closing on any variables. Flatter is better. Also, it
is plausible that folks will want more control over creating
individual jQuery elements (but still want this helper).
I don't think anybody ever really used this feature, which I
developed but don't even use myself. It kind of runs counter
to the minimalist approach of the rest of node tests.
I would eventually like to re-think the template tests altogether.
They're slow, and we could solve that somewhat by replacing
jsdon/jquery with an HTML parser library to verify structural
things.
It's also possible that we can just rely on our template linters
to catch the biggest class of errors (malformed tags) and let
code review do the rest.
And it's also possible that we should make a second attempt to
ramp up tooling on making it easy to verify templates, but it
doesn't have to be part of the node tests. If we did that, we
would also potentially use tooling for Python-side templates.
We flatten the code a bit by removing a check that type is object,
and we replace it later with a check that type is string.
We also no longer allow document-like objects to be wrapped based
on the location-attribute-is-present hack. Instead, we want the
tests to just set document to 'document-stub'.
We can now extend zjquery using the $.fn mechanism. This isn't
necessarily recommended for test code (since you can just stub
individual objects directly), but some of our real code does this.
Added support for passing a filename without `.js` suffix.
This then fixed the issue of no complaints for invalid test
files. Now, throws an error for invalid test files.
Fixes#8579.
Clicking the cancel button removes all the changes and the user
group returns back to the original state. Saved button is showed
once the changes are saved on blur.
This restructures organization settings and permissions to be
more accurately grouped and for the permissions page to not be too
long.
CHANGES:
PROFILE:
(this was split out)
organization-profile-admin.handlebars:
form #1:
name
description
(SUBMIT)
avatar:
(UPLOAD)
(DELETE)
SETTINGS:
organization-settings-admin.handlebars:
language (mostly untouched)
message editing:
time limit/history/retention
message feed:
mandatory-topics
preview images
preview websites
PERMISSIONS:
organization-permissions-admin.handlebars
(mostly stuff was removed)
Joining:
restrict domains
require invite
User Identity:
name changes
email changes
Streams/Emoji:
creating streams:
waiting period (ADDED)
adding emojis
(SUBMIT) for whole panel
The profile group (name, description, avatar) were split into a new
page that did not previously exist, and the permissions was stripped
of message settings (message editing, message feed), but keeping the
"waiting period" input and putting it in the "Streams & custom emoji"
section.
Fixes: #5844.
We are phasing out the following in tests:
add_dependencies - this is just kind of a clunky UI
require - normal JS requires cause test leaks
In order to plug require leaks, we are effectively doing what
we always have done inside of add_dependencies, which is to
keep track of which modules we have done `require` on, and
these get cleared between tests.
Now we just use `zrequire` every time we want to pull in real
code to our global namespace.
This allow the webbpack dev server to properly reload JavaScript modules
while running in dev without restarting the server. We need to connect
to webpack-dev-server directly because SockJS doesn't support more than
one connection on the same host/port.
This commit add $.create(), which allows you to create a
jQuery object that just has a name to identify it, as opposed
to some selector or HTML fragment. It's useful for things that
are really used as stubs.
This also fixes a bunch of the existing tests to use $.create().
Before this fix, you could actually just do $('some-stub'), but
now we enforce that the input to $() looks like a valid selector
or HTML fragment, and we make some exceptions for things like
window-stub and document-stub.
Hopefully this will make it more explicit that zjquery does
not truly simulate DOM, but it instead allows you to dynamically
set what you want the results of $('foo').find(some_selector)
to be.
Before this commit, we were erroneously setting up parents
as part of add_child() calls, but it's not necessarily the
case that those children are immediate children, and therefore
the first object is not necessarily the immediate parent.