This is done to decouple our message view related update events
from MessageListData as there are plans to create multiple
MessageListData objects. Instead we update the `stored_messages`
which tracks the complete data for all messages.
This just lets us temporarily assign a value
to a field.
Differences with the "override" scheme:
* override only works on globals
* override (when passed in via run_test) will
just automatically clean up at the end of
the function
Some parameters such as `to` and `topic` have been intentionally
undocumentecd hence fail request validation. So mark tests which
fail due to this accordingly.
Change the condition for allowing failed validation to the condition
that `if the test fails, response status code begins with 4`. Also
add `intentionally_undocumented` argument in `validate_request` for
allowing passing of tests which return `200` responses but fail
validation due to some intentionally undocumented feature in
OpenAPI specification.
This makes sure out fixture data for node tests
is realistic, according to the schemas in
zerver/lib/event_schema.py.
Note that we are still in the process of extracting
schemas from test_events.py -> event_schema.py,
so the checks here are somewhat incomplete as of
now.
One nice thing is that the program will tell us
what checkers are missing, so this can motivate
us to move more checkers to event_schema.py.
I considered just making this happen as part of
tools/test-js-with-node, but it's convenient to
run by itself. Also, it currently requires
Django (although we could fix that), which makes
it just expensive enough that I wouldn't want
to always run it before the node tests.
This is a pretty straightforward conversion.
The bulk of the diff is just changing emoji.js
to ES6 syntax.
There is one little todo that can be deferred
to the next commit--we are now set up to have
markdown.js require emoji.js directly, since
it is no longer on `window`.
We now show before/after, and we don't complicate
our other test that runs in a big loop.
And we take advantage of function injection to
not have to hack into the "real" emoji_codes
structure.
Note that we're simulating the missing emojis
at a slightly higher level, but we already had test
coverage that emoji.get_emoji_name returns
undefined for unknown codepoints.
The main thing here is that we check that the
actual data got put into our data structures.
(In general we want to move away from stubbing
data modules; any place where we stub data modules
is a relic of earlier days, where we were just
trying to set the bar for 100% line coverage,
even though some of the original coverage was
quite shallow.)
I also use real stubs instead of noops for
the calls out to UI-oriented modules.
In passing I tweak some comments in the actual
dispatch code.
This makes it so that the authoritative holder
of all emoji data is emoji.js, and all our
UI components that need emoji data consistently
pull data from emoji.js as needed.
Or to put it another way, we no longer need the
dispatch module to know that emoji_picker is
coupled to emoji precisely by the active_realm_emojis
data; it can now make fewer assumptions.
With update_emojis, it is pretty easy
to set up the tests with reasonable
data without reaching into internal
data structures.
Also, we can begin the process of
sharing the same data with our
dispatch tests (upcoming).
Mohit Gupta
Ryan Rehman
Steve Howell
Dinesh
Anders Kaseorg
orientor