As of commit 87e72ac8e2 (#15267), we
need to be an owner for some of the tested functionality, not just an
administrator.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Zulip converts :) to the 1F642 Unicode emoji and promotes the same emoji
in the popular section of the emoji picker.
Previously Zulip has labeled 1F642 as "slight smile". While that name
conforms to the Unicode standard (which describes the code point as
SLIGHTLY SMILING FACE), it didn't match our use case of the emoji.
If a user types :) or selects the first smile in the emoji picker they
probably mean to express a regular "smile" and not a "slight smile",
which raises the question why they are only smiling slightly.
This commit relabels 1F642 as 😄 and our previous 😄 263A as
:smiling_face:. Note that 263A looks different in our three supported
emoji sets, so it is not suited to be our "default smile".
This change does not require a migration since our emoji system stores
both unicode points and names and handles name changes transparently.
Prettier would do this anyway, but it’s separated out for a more
reviewable diff. Generated by ESLint.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Prettier would do this anyway, but it’s separated out for a more
reviewable diff. Generated by ESLint.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
A few major themes here:
- We remove short_name from UserProfile
and add the appropriate migration.
- We remove short_name from various
cache-related lists of fields.
- We allow import tools to continue to
write short_name to their export files,
and then we simply ignore the field
at import time.
- We change functions like do_create_user,
create_user_profile, etc.
- We keep short_name in the /json/bots
API. (It actually gets turned into
an email.)
- We don't modify our LDAP code much
here.
Fixes#12868.
We now also include python version in the format
'major.minor.patchlevel', when generating hash for a
requirement file. This was necessary since packages tend to
break on different versions of python, so it is important to
track the version on which the venv was setup.
WARN: This commit will force all zulip venvs to be recreated.
success-http-headers-bionic.txt and success-http-headers-focal.txt
differ only in the nginx version so this substitution will allow
us to have single file for both of them. Also this change helps
to avoid CI failure if Nginx version is updated in the OS.
The installer does not adjust the node name if the rabbitmq already
exists, and the default node name bakes in the
`zulip-install-bionic-base` hostname. As such, the resulting LXC
image does not properly start rabbitmq.
Remove rabbitmq, allowing the installer to install and configure it
with a nodename of `zulip@localhost`. This also lets the installed
image be successfully copied and booted under a new hostname without
breaking rabbitmq.
Doing service memcached start instead of restart fixed an issue on
focal build in GitHub actions, where it exits with code 1 when it
is done twice.It is done first in Install Dependencies step and then
again in last step where we call tools/ci/setup-backend again which
runs provision.
Furthermore, I don't belive there is a technical reason we use
restart over start; rather I think it was just a random choice with
the intend to just start the services in CI. I traced the code back
to commit 1f2f497cab if it helps.
Looking at the source code of memcached, the step that's failing is:
start-stop-daemon --stop --quiet --oknodo --pidfile $PIDFILE
which is equivilent to: service memcached stop, we can rule out the
service memcache start since it works. Ideally, we do figure out and
solve the issue of why memcached fails when executing service
memcached stop but I am not equipped with debugging it. And this
workaround seems reasonable rather than a "hacky" solution.
For the relevant code in memcached see:
https://github.com/memcached/memcached/blob/master/scripts/memcached-init.
Finally, the change to the rest of services is for consistency.
According to @showell:
> All the slow decorators can die. That was a failed experiment of
> mine from 2014 days. I have meaning to kill them for a couple years
> now. I wrote this with the best of intentions, but I believe it's
> now just cruft. We never made a "fast" mode, for one. And we kept
> writing more and more slow tests, haha.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>