Prettier would do this anyway, but it’s separated out for a more
reviewable diff. Generated by ESLint.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
On update_message events, we were changing narrow before we
locally updated the data, this resulted in a weird mismatch
between locally available data and that fetched from the server.
Ideally, we should not be requesting any data from the server
in most scenarios since the messages for new narrow is
locally available.
As a result, the new narrow didn't have any messages other than
a breadcrumb message. To fix this, we change narrow post
locally updating the data.
The original bug was not exactly reproduced, but a similar version
of it was simulated and was found to be fixed.
Tweaked by tabbott to preserve an optimization.
This ensures that we do this fetch, which is intended to get data on
the pre-event state, before we start perturbing the message list data
structures via rerendering.
We remove the "GROUP PMs" section that used
to be in the lower right sidebar.
Most of this is straightforward code removal.
A couple quick notes:
- The message fetching code now just
calls `huddle_data.process_loaded_messages`,
which we still need for search suggestions.
We removed `activity.process_loaded_messages`.
- The `huddle_data.process_loaded_messages`
function no longer needs to return `need_resize`.
- In `resize.js` we now just calculate
`res.buddy_list_wrapper_max_height` directly
from `usable_height`.
This commit adds code to live update the message edit history.
Message edit history is fetched and rendered again if the edit
history modal is open.
This also adds 'data-message-id' attribute to 'message-history'
when opening history modal element which is used for checking
whether the history modal opened is of the message which is
edited.
Fixes#15051.
Add methods to extract recent topics from received messages.
Process new messages as they are received.
Use new messages received from the server to extract recent_topics.
Node tests added.
This significantly reduces the time required to handle events like
stream & topic name edit for topics.
Verified using the Chrome Profiler for a topic with 100 messages:
With this commit: 0.64s to move the topic to a different stream.
Without this commit: 5.5s.
* Remove old topic and reprocess both old and new topic to ensure
that we are correctly storing the last_msg_id of users in the
topic. Also, Handle topic's stream (& topic) edit updates.
* Add function to get all messages in a topic in message_utils.js.
* Send topic edit event to recent_senders.
* Add func get sorted list of recent_senders to topic.
The function will be useful to handle topic edits in Recent Topic UI.
This commit makes it so that inline (recipient bar) topic edits follow
a different path from full message row edits in `message_edit.js`.
This commit:
- deletes `.save()` endpoint and replaces all calls to it with
`.save_message_row_edit()` and `.save_inline_topic_edit()`
- deletes `.end()` endpoint and replaces all calls to it with calls to
either ".end_message_row_edit()" and ".end_inline_topic_edit()".
`stream_topic_history` is a more appropriate name as this
module will contain information about last message of a
stream in upcoming commits. Function and variable names
are changed accordingly like:
* topic_history() -> per_stream_history()
* get_recent_names() -> get_recent_topic_names()
* name -> topic_name
We had a bug where if your peer mentioned you in
message, but then edited the message not to mention
you, the latter wouldn't reset your unread counts
for "Mentions". And the same problem would happen
vice versa.
The fix basically extracts `update_message_for_mention`
and makes sure it handles all combinations of
unread/mentioned flags, instead of assuming
any invariants about which directions of change
are possible.
And then we call that new function from
`message_events.js` whenever we get message
edit events.
Fixes#14544
This is part of #6427, adding support for live-updating the Zulip UI
to move messages to a new topic.
As noted in the comments, there is still a bug to be fixed here
involving guest users, but the overall implementation is pretty well
tested manually (which is how we test most message-edit UI work since
there's so much complexity involved).
Co-Authored-By: Wbert Adrián Castro Vera <wbertc@gmail.com>
This intent is that we'll be able to reuse this when editing streams
as well.
* Rename method: filter_with_new_topic to filter_with_new_param.
* Fix tests and method calls.
These functions were just shims that were
used in the somewhat painful migration from
subject_* to topic_*.
The commit 4572be8c27
fixed it so that the client never needs to
deal with "subject_links".
So now we just go back to simpler code:
message.topic_links = links
links = message.topic_links
We now treat util like a leaf module and
use "require" to import it everywhere it's used.
An earlier version of this commit moved
util into our "shared" library, but we
decided to wait on that. Once we're ready
to do that, we should only need to do a
simple search/replace on various
require/zrequire statements plus a small
tweak to one of the custom linter checks.
It turns out we don't really need util.js
for our most immediate code-sharing goal,
which is to reuse our markdown code on
mobile. There's a little bit of cleanup
still remaining to break the dependency,
but it's minor.
The util module still calls the global
blueslip module in one place, but that
code is about to be removed in the next
few commits.
I am pretty confident that once we start
sharing things like the typeahead code
more aggressively, we'll start having
dependencies on util. The module is barely
more than 300 lines long, so we'll probably
just move the whole thing into shared
rather than break it apart. Also, we
can continue to nibble away at the
cruftier parts of the module.
Updates the message editing process to do a local 'echo'.
On slow connections, now there is visual confirmation of the edit,
similar to when sending messages. The contains_backend_only_syntax
logic and check are the same as there.
We showing "(SAVING)" until the edit is completed, and on successful
edit, the word "(EDITED)" appears. There's likely useful future work
to do on making the animation experience nicer.
Substantially rewritten by tabbott to better handle corner cases and
communicate more clearly about what's happening.
Fixes: #3530.
This commit was originally automatically generated using `tools/lint
--only=eslint --fix`. It was then modified by tabbott to contain only
changes to a set of files that are unlikely to result in significant
merge conflicts with any open pull request, excluding about 20 files.
His plan is to merge the remaining changes with more precise care,
potentially involving merging parts of conflicting pull requests
before running the `eslint --fix` operation.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
With webpack, variables declared in each file are already file-local
(Global variables need to be explicitly exported), so these IIFEs are
no longer needed.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
If you topic-edited a single message within a narrow, we would update
all our unreads/sidebar/etc. data structures, and would rerender the
message if appropriate. However, for the corner case of being inside
a topic narrow when you did this, we didn't have logic to remove the
message from the narrow (which is the appropriate situation when you
just topic-edited a message in a narrow).
When topic-editing multiple messages including the currently selected
message (the more common case), we would end up changing the narrow,
resulting in this issue being masked.
Fixes#11601.
Show "sent to different narrow" notification and other such notification by
notifications.notify_local_mixes for non locally echoed message sent by
current client.
With significant new comments added by tabbott.
Fixes: #11488.
Since the main autoscroll feature was implemeneted, the
maybe_advance_to_recently_sent_message logic had an unfortunate
structure, where the code for this potentially large scroll was
running AFTER the autoscroll decision was made, but before an actual
scroll could have occurred.
This resulted in code that was very difficult to reason about, as
there were 2 potential sources of scrolling when you send a new
message, with little connection between their implementations either
in location or implementation.
Moving this into the main autoscrolling code path clarifies the code,
with the added benefit of fixing a bug where we would report to the
user that they needed to scroll down when in fact we were just about
to scroll the bottom of the feed into view (via
maybe_advance_to_recently_sent_message).
With this change, we never display the "you need to scroll manually"
message in the cast that we just scrolled you there via selecting a
message.
We recently added a feature to warn users that they
may need to scroll down to view messages that they
just sent, but it was broken due to various complexities
in the rendering code path.
Now we compute it a bit more rigorously.
It requires us to pass some info about rendering up
and down the stack, which is why it's kind of a long
commit, but the bulk of the logic is in these JS files:
* message_list_view.js
* notifications.js
I choose to pass structs around instead of booleans,
because I anticipate we may eventually add more metadata
about rendering to it, plus bools are just kinda brittle.
(The exceptions are that `_maybe_autoscroll`, which
is at the bottom of the stack, just passes back a simple
boolean, and `notify_local_mixes`, also at the bottom
of the stack, just accepts a simple boolean.)
This errs on the side of warning the user, even if the
new message is partially visible.
Fixes#11138
We now have two functions:
add_new_messages
add_old_messages
This is a lot easier on the eyes, and it will also
prevent us from exceeding line length in future commits.
We also remove an unneeded stub in the narrow_activate
tests.
This commit makes it a bit more explicit about
why we're updating 2 or 3 message lists every time.
It looks funny now to repeat the home-list updates
in both sides of the conditional, but this will be
more obvious in a subsequent commit, where we want
to capture return values from rendering.
Apparently, we didn't have one of these, and thus had a moderate
number of generally very old violations in the codebase. Fix this and
clear the ones that exist..
For message groups, I just changed the internal name
to "topic_links".
For uses of "subject_links" that are tied to how the
server names fields, I introduced these wrappers:
* util.set_topic_links(obj, topic_links)
* util.get_topic_links(obj)
These can be used for either messages or events.
This commit prepares the frontend code to be consumed by webpack.
It is a hack: In theory, modules should be declaring and importing the
modules they depend on and the globals they expose directly.
However, that requires significant per-module work, which we don't
really want to block moving our toolchain to webpack on.
So we expose the modules by setting window.varName = varName; as
needed in the js files.
Anders Kaseorg
Tim Abbott
Aman Agrawal
Sharif Naas
Steve Howell
sahil839
Aman Agrawal
YashRE42
Hashir Sarwar
Steve Howell
Tim Abbott
Wbert Adrian Castro Vera
shubhamgupta2956
Anders Kaseorg
Jack Tiggleman
Mohit Gupta
Rohitt Vashishtha
Armaan Ahluwalia