This just replaces the billing/upgrade with the statement that
"Your organization has requested sponsored or discounted hosting.", so
it should include an obvious contact in case the customer wants to amend
something or just bump a request that may have gotten missed.
Previously this was only available on the upgrade page - meaning an
organization that already bought a plan wouldn't be able to request a
sponsorship to get a discount or such, even if qualified.
Updates the message sent by the notification bot when an
organization is approved for full sponsorship on Zulip
Cloud Standard to include a request to list and link to
Zulip on any acknowledgement or sponsorship pages.
Disables submit buttons on billing / upgrade page for demo
organizations since they will need to become permanent
organizations before upgrading to Zulip Cloud Standard.
Also creates an alert banner on the same page that links to
the help center article on demo organizations.
Updates sub-headers on demo organizations help center
article to match link text and to follow general convention
of using imperative verb forms in help center subheaders.
Part of #19523.
Co-authored by: Lauryn Menard <lauryn@zulip.com>
This is an unused argument. We removed it so that we don't
need to create a `TypedDict` and unpack it when calling
the test client methods.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Since `HttpResponse` is an inaccurate representation of the
monkey-patched response object returned by the Django test client, we
replace it with `_MonkeyPatchedWSGIResponse` as `TestHttpResponse`.
This replaces `HttpResponse` in zerver/tests, analytics/tests, coporate/tests,
zerver/lib/test_classes.py, and zerver/lib/test_helpers.py with
`TestHttpResponse`. Several files in zerver/tests are excluded
from this substitution.
This commit is auto-generated by a script, with manual adjustments on certain
files squashed into it.
This is a part of the django-stubs refactorings.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Given that these values are uuids, it's better to use UUIDField which is
meant for exactly that, rather than an arbitrary CharField.
This requires modifying some tests to use valid uuids.
This is a follow-up to #19752. The tests in that PR did not verify
that the financial math involved worked properly. This commit
improves the existing tests and adds new fixtures to make sure
that the financial math works as expected.
It is confusing to have the plan type constants not be namespaced
by the thing they represent. We already have a namespacing
convention in place for constants, so we should use it for
Realm.plan_type as well.
compute_plan_parameters assumed that the value of
tier is always CustomerPlan.STANDARD. We change that behavior
to make the function handle CustomerPlan.PLUS as well.
We ran into a bug in production caused by two issues:
- Some users came from orgs that didn't have a website and since
the URL field was required, they submitted invalid URLs.
- We didn't properly respond to invalid form submissions, which
led to UnboundLocalError exceptions in another part of the
code.
This commit solves this by doing the following:
- We now allow blank URLs and have a convenient placeholder text
label that tells users that they may leave the URL field blank.
- This commit refactors the code such that invalid form submissions
result in an informative error message about what exactly went
wrong.
These changes are all independent of each other; I just didn’t feel
like making dozens of commits for them.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Mateusz Mandera
Alex Vandiver
Lauryn Menard
Anders Kaseorg
Tim Abbott
Eeshan Garg
Zixuan James Li
Zixuan James Li
Aman Agrawal
Vishnu KS