We also record the historical edits to the message in this JSON format:
[{"prev_content": "new test message 14", "timestamp": 1369157249},
{"prev_content": "new test message 13", "timestamp": 1369157118}]
but we don't actually do anything with the information as of yet.
(imported from commit 2d5ca449b87b33ad035ab0e076a22e150c8e7267)
Currently the interface for editing messages is limited to a
command-line API tool; it's great for testing with e.g.:
./api/examples/edit-message --message=348135 --content="test $(date +%s)" --site=http://localhost:9991 --subject="test"
The next commit will add a user interface for actually doing the editing.
(imported from commit bdd408cec2946f31c2292e44f724f96ed5938791)
This, combined with acrefoot's work on sending the notifications in
bulk, resolves trac #1142 -- we do only 10 database queries and the
whole operation completes in about 300ms on my laptop.
(imported from commit 36b5bb836bc6c713903d1ca72e39af87775dc469)
Users can send to any stream except invite-only streams that they
aren't subscribed to. Bots can send to any stream except invite-only
streams that neither they nor their owner is subscribed to.
(imported from commit 623d34d249d923611ca7ca781b5b55205cd3e548)
This decouples from Chrome notifications, which gives us cross-platform
support in at least modern browsers.
We log this action so its replayable in our message logs.
This implements the model change indicated by the previous schema commit.
(imported from commit b21213cdde54f43670bbb0bf1f607147fc732b38)
See PEP 328[1] for details. This feature was introduced in Python 2.5 and
will become mandatory in Python 3.
[1]: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0328
(imported from commit 7444eeba8a08d5f91b94c7921848f2274979bd76)
This commit will incorrectly list past-online users as active, a shortcoming that is
addressed in the next commit
(imported from commit b018767df686f88c0ca939c067c573e4d7cea357)
This avoids 10s of seconds of delay when you invite several people at
once through the web UI.
(imported from commit 75acdbdb04caf62bbb08affc7796330246d8a00e)
The previous code for adding users to default streams wouldn't do so
if the user didn't have a PreregistrationUser row.
(imported from commit 25f1383f6771319542d07660b29d891368889212)
This is preparatory for removing the StreamColor model, so we also set
things up so anything changing the StreamColor model changes the
Subscription model too.
The manual task is to run the copy_colors.py management command after
deployment to each of staging and prod.
(imported from commit 1be7523ca59f5266eb2c4dc2009e31209ed49635)
I think all that one needs to do to deploy this commit is on developer
laptops, run `generate-fixtures --force`.
(imported from commit 34916341435fef0875b5a2c7f53c2f5606cd16cd)
When this is deployed to staging, we need to run
./manage.py logout_all_users --realm=humbughq.com
When this is deployed to prod, we need to run
./manage.py logout_all_users
(imported from commit d6c6ea4b1c347f3d9122742db23c7b67767a7349)
This is intended to be used logging out users during our deployment of
the UserProfile merge, but it could be useful for other things too.
(imported from commit bfe896d854f997f7a4d06e5bc0f19ec5b1aa5e69)
Previously, we weren't clearing the users out of memcached (we just
killed them in the database), so in fact users were not logged out
when we deactivated them for an hour (when the memcached caches would
expire).
(imported from commit 0f0a2f70e003c184106c73b22b876f57c1ef3371)
And keep the fields updated, by copying on UserProfile creation and
updating the UserProfile object whenever we're updating the User
object, and add management commands to (1) initially ensure that they
match and (2) check that they still match (aka that the updating code
is working).
The copy_user_to_userprofile migration needs to be run after this is
deployed to prod.
(imported from commit 0a598d2e10b1a7a2f5c67dd5140ea4bb8e1ec0b8)
This way we're not directly manipulating user.password() in random
management commands.
(imported from commit e6e32ae422015ab55184d5d8111148793a8aca36)
The previous situation was bad for two reasons:
(1) It had a lot of copies of the code, some of them missing pieces:
UserProfile.objects.get(user__email__iexact=foo)
This was in particular going to be inconvenient since we are dropping
the __user part of that.
(2) It didn't take advantage of our memcached caching.
(imported from commit 2325795f288a7cf306cdae191f5d3080aac0651a)
Only a few of them took a User as an argument anyway.
This is preparatory work for merging the User and UserProfile models.
(imported from commit 65b2bd2453597531bcf135ccf24d2a4615cd0d2a)
Tim Abbott
Jessica McKellar
Leo Franchi
Zev Benjamin
Luke Faraone