Not all webhook payloads are json, so send_json_payload was a
bit misleading.
In passing I also remove "bytes" from the Union type for
"payload" parameter.
Almost all webhook tests use this helper, except a few
webhooks that write to private streams.
Being concise is important here, and the name
`self.send_and_test_stream_message` always confused
me, since it sounds you're sending a stream message,
and it leaves out the webhook piece.
We should consider renaming `send_and_test_private_message`
to something like `check_webhook_private`, but I couldn't
decide on a great name, and it's very rarely used. So
for now I just made sure the docstrings of the two
sibling functions reference each other.
Generated by `pyupgrade --py3-plus --keep-percent-format` on all our
Python code except `zthumbor` and `zulip-ec2-configure-interfaces`,
followed by manual indentation fixes.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
There are only a handful of non-JSON webhooks that wouldn't
benefit from the notify_bot_owner_on_invalid_json feature.
Specifically, these are the webhooks where the third-party product
uses another format, whether it be HTML form-encoded, XML, or
something else.
Tweaked by tabbott to correc the list of excluded webhooks.
This commit migrates all of our webhooks to use
check_send_webhook_message, except the following:
beeminder: Rishi wanted to wait on this one.
teamcity: This one is slightly more work.
yo: This one is PM-only. I am still trying to decide whether we
should have a force_private argument or something in
check_send_webhook_message.
facebook: No point in migrating this, will be removed as part of
#8433.
slack: Slightly more work too with the `channel_to_topics` feature.
Warrants a longer discussion.
This commit migrates all webhooks to use check_send_stream_message
instead of check_send_message. The only two webhooks that still
use check_send_message are our yo and teamcity webhooks. They
both use check_send_message for private messages.
Previously, api_key_only_webhook_view passed 3 positional arguments
(request, user_profile, and client) into a function. However, most
of our other auth decorators only pass 2 positional arguments. For
the sake of consistency, we now make api_key_only_webhook_view set
request.client and pass only request and user_profile as positional
arguments.
All webhook fixtures in zerver/fixtures/<webhook_name> have now
been moved to dedicated webhook-specific directories under
zerver/webhooks/<webhook_name>/fixtures, where <webhook_name> is
the name of the webhook.
I dug into why we never did this before, and it turns out we did, but
using `$.trim()` (which removes leading whitespace as well!). When
removing the `$.trim()` usage.
Fixes#3294.
Adds a new webhook integration for WordPress blogs. Both WordPress.com
and self-installed blogs are supported, with minor differences that
are described in the documentation. It creates a new message for each
action, the stream and topic may be specified or use default values.
WordPress actions supported:
publish_post: a new blog post was published
publish_page: a new page was published
user_register: a new user account was created
wp_login: a user logged in
Notes: comment_post only provides the id of the parent post, not title
or link, so was not included. On further testing, I found edit_post is
not very practical, it also fires while a new post is being written, and
when posts are deleted. (I think it tracks drafts too.) I've removed it,
as it seems more confusing than useful.
Fixes#3245
Steve Howell
Anders Kaseorg
Anders Kaseorg
Tim Abbott
Eeshan Garg
Anders Kaseorg
Preston Hansen
Xavier Cooney
rht
Jack Zhang
Feorlen