For 3000 messages and 400 users, this saved
about 30 seconds.
We only do two queries per batch of messages
now, and the algorithm is easier to analyze,
as it's just three nested loops.
Note that we are much more efficient about finding
active users here:
- we do one query per realm (instead of per-user)
- we pass the cutoff date to the database
- we get back just a list of distinct ids
The query counts increase here for somewhat
contrived reasons. The tests before this
commit reflected a successful trip to the
UserProfile cache, but that's not actually
realistic in practice.
We don't need to mock the dates here. We also
explicitly clear out all streams first, and then
we explicitly test with both the stream being
current and the stream being old.
We can use the _enqueue_emails_for_realm helper
to avoid all the Tuesday-related logic here.
We also don't bother to create UserActivity
records, since the bot gets excluded by virtue
of its being a bot. (Also, the date ranges
here were sketchy due to the time mocking.)
We can avoid all the date mocking now for all
but a couple tests that exercise the is-it-Tuesday
logic.
And this test now correctly tests that we exclude
recently active users.
And this allows us to remove the other test.
This commit fixes a bug in marked.js which caused it to double-escape
HTML when rendering messages of the form: *[text](url)*.
This fixes a bug introduced in
3bdc8bbaa5, where an unnecessary
escape() call was added for the <em> code path, likely just because it
was adjacent to the others that needed it in the file.
Fix this, and add tests to verify that things are still being escaped
once after removing this extra escape.
Fixes#14845.
I now use sets for stream_ids in more of the digest
code.
As part of this I replaced exclude_subscription_modified_streams
with streams_recently_modified_for_user.
It's easier for the caller to just ask for ids
to delete from its callee than it is to pass
in a set/list to mutate.
The simpler boundary between the functions makes
the tests easier to write--you can see the
`filtered_streams` logic goes away in this diff.
I also make the tests a bit more thorough by using
combinations of Cordelia/Othello and Verona/Denmark
to try to find multiple possible flaws.
And I make the time intervals longer than 1s to
avoid false negatives from slow CI boxes.
If we have multiple users, this reduces the amount
of queries we need to do, because we get all
subscriptions for all users in a single query
to Subscription.
For the single-user case, we are introducing an
extra query hop, but the database is doing
roughly the same work, because we are just breaking
up this complex query into two hops:
messages =
select ... from message
where recipient__type_id in (
select stream_id from subscription
where ...
)
Now it's more like:
stream_ids =
select stream_id from subscription
where ...
messages =
select ... from message
where recipient__type_id in stream_ids
Note that we are not changing anything semantically
or algorithmically yet. The only overhead here
for the single-user case is boxing and unboxing
data into single-item dicts and lists.
The interfaces for callers in the view and the
queue processor remain the same for now.
We didn't need the enough-traffic mock.
We also continue to prep for testing multiple users.
I also finally remove a comment that is about to
be addressed (and which inaccurately refers to huddles).
In 709493cd75 (Feb 2017)
I added code to render_markdown that re-fetched the
sender of the message, to detect whether the message is
a bot.
It's better to just let the ORM fetch this. The
message object should already have sender.
The diff makes it look like we are saving round trips
to the database, which is true in some cases. For
the main message-send codepath, though, we are only
saving a trip to memcached, since the middleware
will have put our sender's user object into the
cache. The test_message_send test calls internally
to check_send_stream_message, so it was actually
hitting the database in render_markdown (prior to
my change).
Before this change we were clearing the cache on
every SQL usage.
The code to do this was added in February 2017
in 6db4879f9c.
Now we clear the cache just one time, but before
the action/request under test.
Tests that want to count queries with a warm
cache now specify keep_cache_warm=True. Those
tests were particularly flawed before this change.
In general, the old code both over-counted and
under-counted queries.
It under-counted SQL usage for requests that were
able to pull some data out of a warm cache before
they did any SQL. Typically this would have bypassed
the initial query to get UserProfile, so you
will see several off-by-one fixes.
The old code over-counted SQL usage to the extent
that it's a rather extreme assumption that during
an action itself, the entries that you put into
the cache will get thrown away. And that's essentially
what the prior code simulated.
Now, it's still bad if an action keeps hitting the
cache for no reason, but it's not as bad as hitting
the database. There doesn't appear to be any evidence
of us doing something silly like fetching the same
data from the cache in a loop, but there are
opportunities to prevent second or third round
trips to the cache for the same object, if we
can re-structure the code so that the same caller
doesn't have two callees get the same data.
Note that for invites, we have some cache hits
that are due to the nature of how we serialize
data to our queue processor--we generally just
serialize ids, and then re-fetch objects when
we pop them off the queue.
Steve asked me to remove this, since the tictactoe game was always
intended as a proof of concept. Now that we have poll and todo
widgets, the sample code for tictactoe has much less value.
We replace the content and type in test_widgets.py to maintain
coverage.
Initally, when writing two or more quotes, having
a blank line in between them, merges those quotes.
This created confusion especially in "quote and reply".
This commit fixes such issues. Now two or more quotes
having a blank line in between them, will not get merged.
This change is correct both for usability and for improving our
compatibility with CommonMark.
Fixes#14379.
This commit removes mock.patch with assertLogs().
* Adds return value to do_rest_call() in outgoing_webhook.py, to
support asserting log output in test_outgoing_webhook_system.py.
* Logs are not asserted in test_realm.py because it would require to users
to be queried using users=User.objects.filter(realm=realm) and the order
of resulting queryset varies for each run.
* In test_decorators.py, replacement of mock.patch is not done because
I'm not sure if it's worth the effort to replace it as it's a return
value of a function.
Tweaked by tabbott to set proper mypy types.
Then because the ID is now part of the draft dict, we can
(and do) change the structure of the "drafts" parameter
returned from `GET /drafts` from an object (mapping ID to
data) to an array.
Signed-off-by: Hemanth V. Alluri <hdrive1999@gmail.com>
Sometimes we don't need to specify the expected_drafts field.
So by removing it, we can reduce the clutter a bit.
Signed-off-by: Hemanth V. Alluri <hdrive1999@gmail.com>
Now the timestamp returned in a draft dict will always be an int.
The endpoints will still accept either an int or a float.
Signed-off-by: Hemanth V. Alluri <hdrive1999@gmail.com>
Our test-backend validation confirms that we don't log anything to
stdout in the tests, so the fact that CI passes with this removes
shows there was nothing being logged.
While working on shifting toward native browser time zone APIs
(#16451), it was found that all but very recent Chrome and Node
versions reject certain legacy timezone aliases like US/Pacific
(https://crbug.com/364374).
For now, we only canonicalize the timezone property returned in user
objects and not the timezone setting itself.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
During the new user creation code path, there can be no existing
active clients for the user being created, so we can skip the code to
send events to that user's clients.
The tests here reflect that we need to send fewer events, and do fewer
queries that would have been spent computing data for these..
Fixes#16503, combined with the long series of recent changes by Steve
Howell to fix super-linear behavior in this code path.
We no bulk up peer_add/peer_remove events by user if the
same user has subscribed to multiple streams (and just
that single user).
This mostly optimizes the new-user codepath, but the
algorithm is a bit more general in nature.
This test was flaky due to some date-related
non-determinism. I make all the Message objects
current to make add_new_user_history reliably
try to bulk-update UserMessage rows to read.
Because of the very large `oneOf` clause of the formats of events
possible in Zulip's `GET /events` system, we had issues with
`test-backend` failures for missing documentation for a new event
format being like 1000 lines of output, which was very much unhelpful.
Fix this by limiting the output use only the oneOf variants that are
broadly similar to the actual payload received.
Fixes#16023.
The comment still pointed to 'vacate' event flow, but
we have removed the vacate event in a9356508ca.
This commit fixes the comment to depict the correct
purpose of below lines, i.e. to test the remove
event flow.
We were including 'realm_user' in event_types along with 'subscription',
but we don't send event of type 'realm_user' when subscribing to a new
stream. This was added in 1c332f5d6a.
This commit removes 'realm_user' from event_types.
The name used to be included in the id_token, but this seems to have
been changed by Apple and now it's sent in the `user` request param.
https://github.com/python-social-auth/social-core/pull/483 is the
upstream PR for this - but upstream is currently unmaintained, so we
have to monkey patch.
We also alter the tests to reflect this situation. Tests no longer put
the name in the id_token, but rather in the `user` request param in the
browser flow, just like it happens in reality.
An adaptation has to be made in the native flow - since the name won't
be included by Apple in the id_token anymore, the app, when POSTing
to the /complete/apple/ endpoint,
can (and should for better user experience)
add the `user` param formatted as json of
{"email": "hamlet@zulip.com", "name": {"firstName": "Full", "lastName": "Name"}}
dict. This is also reflected by the change in the
native flow tests.
We now can send an implied matrix of user/stream tuples
for peer_add and peer_remove events.
The client code basically does this:
for stream_id in event['stream_ids']:
for user_id in event['user_ids']:
update_sub(stream_id, user_id)
We used to send individual events, which gets real
expensive when you are creating new streams. For
the case of copy-to-stream case, we should see
events go from U to 1, where U is the number of users
added.
Note that we don't yet fully optimize the potential
of this schema. For adding a new user with lots
of default streams, we still send S peer_add events.
And if you subscribe a bunch of users to a bunch of
private streams, we only go from U * S to S; we can't
optimize it down to one event easily.
All the fields of a stream's recipient object can
be inferred from the Stream, so we just make a local
object. Django will create a Message object without
checking that the child Recipient object has been
saved. If that behavior changes in some upgrade,
we should see some pretty obvious symptom, including
query counts changing.
Tweaked by tabbott to add a longer explanatory comment, and delete a
useless old comment.
This saves us a query for edge cases like when
you try to unsubscribe from a public stream
that you have already unsubscribed from.
But this is mostly to prep for upcoming
optimizations.
Initially markdown titles were overridden by Youtube and Vimeo preview titles.
But now it will check if any markdown title is present to replace Youtube or
Vimeo preview titles, if preview of linked websites is enabled.
Fixes#16100
Upstream has slightly changed the whitespace around stashes. Take
this opportunity to clean up the extra blank lines we were outputting.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
That class is an artifact of when Stream
didn't have recipient_id. Now it's simpler
to deal with stream subscriptions.
We also save a query during page load (and
other places where we get subscriber
info).
We already trust ids that are put on our queue
for deferred work. For example, see the code for
"mark_stream_messages_as_read_for_everyone"
We now pass stream_recipient_id when we queue
up work for do_mark_stream_messages_as_read.
This generally saves about 3 queries per
user when we unsubscribe them from a stream.
We get two speedups:
* The query to get existing subscribers only
gets the two fields we need. We no longer
need all the overhead of user_profile
and recipient data being returned in the
query.
* We avoid Django making extra hops to the
database to get user info.
We replace get_peer_user_ids_for_stream_change
with two bulk functions to get peers and/or
subscribers.
Note that we have three codepaths that care about
peers:
subscribing existing users:
we need to tell peers about new subscribers
we need to tell subscribed user about old subscribers
unsubscribing existing users:
we only need to tell peers who unsubscribed
subscribing new user:
we only need to tell peers about the new user
(right now we generate send_event
calls to tell the new user about existing
subscribers, but this is a waste
of effort that we will fix soon)
The two bulk functions are this:
bulk_get_subscriber_peer_info
bulk_get_peers
They have some overlap in the implementation,
but there are some nuanced differences that are
described in the comments.
Looking up peers/subscribers in bulk leads to some
nice optimizations.
We will save some memchached traffic if you are
subscribing to multiple public streams.
We will save a query in the remove-subscriber
case if you are only dealing with private streams.
We used to send occupy/vacate events when
either the first person entered a stream
or the last person exited.
It appears that our two main apps have never
looked at these events. Instead, it's
generally the case that clients handle
events related to stream creation/deactivation
and subscribe/unsubscribe.
Note that we removed the apply_events code
related to these events. This doesn't affect
the webapp, because the webapp doesn't care
about the "streams" field in do_events_register.
There is a theoretical situation where a
third party client could be the victim of
a race where the "streams" data includes
a stream where the last subscriber has left.
I suspect in most of those situations it
will be harmless, or possibly even helpful
to the extent that they'll learn about
streams that are in a "quasi" state where
they're activated but not occupied.
We could try to patch apply_event to
detect when subscriptions get added
or removed. Or we could just make the
"streams" piece of do_events_register
not care about occupy/vacate semantics.
I favor the latter, since it might
actually be what users what, and it will
also simplify the code and improve
performance.
The query to get "occupied" streams has been expensive
in the past. I'm not sure how much any recent attempts
to optimize that query have mitigated the issue, but
since we clearly aren't sending this data, there is no
reason to compute it.
Using web_public_guest for anonymous users is confusing since
'guest' is actually a logged-in user compared to
web_public_guest which is not logged-in and has only
read access to messages. So, we rename it to
web_public_visitor.
This is a more thorough test of adding multiple
streams for multiple users, including streams
that users have already subscribed to.
The extra queries here are due to the fact
that we call `principal_to_user_profile` in
a loop in the view. So that's an example
of O(N) overhead. We may be able to bulk-fetch
these users eventually.
This is a pure extraction, except that I remove a
redundant check that `len(principals) > 0`. Whenever
that value is false, then `new_subscriptions` will
only have one possible entry, which is the current
user, and we skip that in the loop.
We no longer do O(N) queries to get existing streams.
This is a somewhat contrived use case--generally, we
are not trying to re-subscribe a user to several
streams. Still, we want to avoid this.
This commit also makes `test_bulk_subscribe_many`
do more work, and the change to the test helped
me discover this bug.
If a user asks to be subscribed to a stream
that they are already subscribed to, then
that stream won't be in new_stream_user_ids,
and we won't need to send an event for it.
This change makes that happen more automatically.
I think it's important that the callers understand
that bulk_add_subscriptions assumes all streams
are being created within a single realm, so I make
it an explicit parameter.
This may be overkill--I would also be happy if we
just included the assertions from this commit.
ssh always runs its command through a shell (after naïvely joining
multiple arguments with spaces), so it needs an extra level of shell
quoting. This should have no effect because we already validated user
with a regex, but it’s better for escaping to be locally correct in
case the context changes.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Steve Howell
Mateusz Mandera
Anders Kaseorg
Mateusz Mandera
akshatdalton
YashRE42
Aman Agrawal
sahil839
m-e-l-u-h-a-n
Hemanth V. Alluri
Vishnu KS
Alex Vandiver
Tim Abbott
Harsh Srivastava