Previously, we used to hide 1:1 PMs with muted users everywhere
in the UI. This commit makes it so that such messages will now be
visible in `pm-with/<muted_user>` narrows, meaning these will not
be excluded from message lists, but will still be hidden under
the "This message was hidden." dialog implemented earlier.
* We hide 1:1 PMs from and to muted users throughout
the UI, because doing so will not lead to loss of
conversational context. The "to" part is also important,
because the last few messages sent to a user before
muting them would probably be asking them to stop
spamming.
* After this change, we will need to do filtering for either
user or topic muting in pretty much all narrows, so we need
to keep the `_all_items` list in MessageListData always
up-to-date.
* A further commit will relax this and make it possible to
view these messages only when in a `pm-with/muted_user`
narrow.
This basically reverts 4bd7ec7c36 and
3a9dfc02e6.
The plan earlier was to have compeletely different codepaths
for user and topic muting, so that we could call seperate
functions in the message list class on receiving the respective
events.
However, this cannot be done, because if we, for example, on
receiving a `muted_users` event, filter `_all_items` based on
just user mutes, and store the result in `_items`, then, that
result may still contain topic-muted messages, which is
undesirable. Hence whenever we filter messages, we must do so
based on both user as well as topic muting.
(The code for the former will be added in further commits.)
So, we will have a single function which will handle updating
the message lists for muting.
These mock objects did not buy any ease in testing, as
evident from the fact that this commit hardly contains
any changes to the tests themselves.
This commit also removes some unnecessary `filter: undefined`,
parameters sent to MessageList constructor.
Add a function which is called before every render to
get the number of items it can render. This can be used by
instance to load custom number of items as per its state.
We allow ListWidget instances to pass functions in opts that can
be called after scrolling to determine when to render.
Also, allow a callback function to be called pre render.
We move compose from being a part of message feed to
being a part of middle column which is a common parent of recent
topics and message feed. This allows us to use a common compose
box for both the views. Fortunately, compose actions were
independent of this change so there weren't any evident
side effects.
Fixes#17543
This corner case was reported in #17320, basically, the
issue was when two or more alert words were used
consecutively with a single space between them, it didn't
detect the even number word as `alert word`.
This button will allow users to avoid a distracting red banner across
their screen, while they wait for their sysadmin to do the upgrade
work.
Fixes: #18359
Since we don't process private messages yet, we don't
need to re-render when we receive a new private message
as it doesn't change any data related to recent_topics.
This will allow us to avoid duplication of array filtering
logic of the form-
`Array.filter((user_id) => !muting.is_user_muted(user_id))` and
`Array.filter((person) => !muting.is_user_muted(person.user_id))`
We want to exclude 1:1 PMs from muted users everywhere
except in `pm-with/<muted_user>`.
This method will help us determine whether we are in such
a narrow.
* We show a "Click here to reveal." hyperlink in the hidden
message dialog for user to click on and read a hidden message.
* The "reveal" action is temporary, in the sense that a revealed
message will again be hidden once the broswer tab reloads or
if the user renarrows.
* When a message is revealed, we make sure to show the sender
of that message, even if it isn't the first message of it's group.
This is because the first message of that message group (which
would have otherwise shown the sender) can still be hidden.
* Reactions and background color after revealing a message are
the same as if the message hadn'e been hidden at all in the
first place.
* We hide the sender and reactions on messages sent by muted
users, and replace the content with a "This message was hidden"
dialog.
* Ideally, we should collapse a series of consequetive
messages sent by muted users into one such dialog, but
that could break the cursor behaviour and `near/<message_id`
links, so we as of now show one dialog per muted message.
* Because we hide the sender, there is a chance of the first
hidden message in a group looking like it was sent by the
author of the message above it. To tackle this, we intentionally
make the hidden message dialog float-left, so that it is clear
that this is a special type of message.
* For context, we still show the timestamp of the message.
* Starring, editing, deleting etc a message still work just like
before.
A further commit will add the ability to reveal a
hidden message.
We also add a check to see if `message_feed_container` is visible,
since it is possible that recent topics could be visible which
was not a possibility when this logic was written.
The 'reply' button shows the stream>topic or recipient(s) of the
selected message, for better UX. It also expands to fill the
remaining horizontal space in the button bar -- this should help make
it easier for new users to figure out how to reply.
Finally, it uses "Message" instead of "Reply", to better match the
compose box.
Fixes#17940.
This test was wrong, in that it checked for the English status string
when the current language was expected to be German; this happened to
work until now because with i18next we were failing to include the
string in question in our translation data; and early today I did the
first translation data sync since our translators had translated that
string for German.
Replacing the group PMs icon with "fa fa-group" icon
drops the color class "fraction_present" logic. As there
is no more use of fraction_present class this commit
cleanups its all existence from the codebase.
As of now, editing a widget doesn't update the rendered content.
It's important to ensure that existing votes or options added later on
don't get deleted when rendered.
This seems more complex than it's worth.
For now, we just prevent edits to widgets.
This commit makes the UI clearer that editing widgets isn't allowed.
See also:
https://github.com/zulip/zulip/issues/14229https://github.com/zulip/zulip/issues/14799Fixes#17156
This commit fixes a rare flake which was most probably
caused when we clicked on the `Check All` button, and
we instantly cleared the filter when it was still marking
the user `checked`, which nullified the effect of clicking
on `Check All` button.
Currently, when there are some old starred messages
in a topic, it is possible that some of them won't be
unstarred on doing "Unstar all messages in topic".
This happens when those messages haven't been fetched
yet from the server, and we have no way to verify if
they actually belong to the topic.
This commit fixes that by changing this mechanism to
first fetch all starred messages in the topic from
the server, and then send their IDs back to the backend
to unstar them.
While doing this, we assume that the user does not
have more than 1000 starred messages in that topic.
Note that, we still depend on the local data to
decide whether or not the "Unstar all messages in
topic" option should be shown in the topic popover.
A method similar to the above cannot be used here, because
making server requests before opening the popover
could visually slow down the popover opening.
Using local data for the topic popover would probably
not be a big problem, because users would want to
unstar all messages in a topic probably after noticing
that there are a lot of them, meaning there was at least
one starred message from that topic which was already
fetched, which is sufficient for us to conclude that
we need to show the option in the topic popover.
Fixes#17790
This logic is already thoroughly tested in node tests for
the `MessageListData` class, and the `unmuted_messages`
method of `MessageList` only directly call the corresponding
method of the data class.
We hide a conversation from the top-left corner PM list if
it is-
* A 1:1 PM where the other user has been muted, or
* Huddle where all users have been muted.
* Extract out data as common variable so that it can
be reused in other tests in the future.
* Use consistent dummy user_ids across tests.
* Expand the data set to cover all possible cases-
- 1:1 PMs
- Huddles
- PMs with self
This commit adds code for live updating the role field of person
object on receiving role change event from server and thus enables
live update of role in users list of settings overlay.
This commit adds code to live update page_params.is_moderator and
person.is_moderator on receiving role change event.
The code for changing role to moderator and from moderator to any
other role was added in previous commit.
This commit modifies the code to show "Moderator" correctly for
realm moderators.
As, we show role using settings_config.user_role_values object and
the same is used for showing options in changing role dropdown, this
commit also adds the moderator option in that dropdown and thus allows
the user to change role to moderator and from moderator to any other
role from frontend.
But the code for live updating page_params.is_moderator and
person.is_moderator will be in further commit.
This commit adds 'admins and moderators' option in frontend for
invite_to_realm_policy.
The logic for moderator for checking whether user is allowed to invite
others or not was added in previous commit as we use common helper
user_has_permission for all policies.
But the test user_can_invite_others_to_relam is updated for including
moderator role in this commit.
Since, we now get role value in person objects sent from server, we
can simply user user_role_map to display role in different places
instead of having multiple if-else conditions to check flags like
is_admin, is_guest, etc.
This commit modifies the user objects returned by 'GET /users',
'GET /users/me', 'GET /users/{user_id}' and 'GET /users/{email}'
endpoints to include role field.
We also include role field in the page_params['realm_users'] dict
and in the person object sent in (type="realm_user", op="add")
event.
This help mobile and terminal clients understand whether a server
restart changed API feature levels or not, which in turn determines
whether they will need to resynchronize their data.
Also add tests and documentation for this previously undocumented
event type.
Fixes: #18205.
There were some changes that were lost/added by mistake
during a rebase of #17707 after #18154 was merged.
Fixes the GIF icon being hidden / displayed incorrectly
with respect to the settings.
These changes were originally part of
67527a2517 but
were lost during the rebase.
This commit adds 'user_can_create_streams' helper which is
used to check whether user can create streams or not and
replaces all the instances of 'page_params.can_create_streams'.
This change helps us to remove the complex logic of updating
'page_params.can_create_streams' for 'realm_update' event in
'server_events_dispatch.js', as we will always get the updated
values from the added helper for checking whether the users can
create streams or not.
This commit adds 'user_can_subscribe_other_users' helper in
settings_data.js amd this helper will replaced all the
instances of page_params.can_subscribe_other_users.
We also remove the incorrect code in server_events_dispatch.js
where we were updating page_params.can_invite_to_stream which
is actually not used in other parts of code and instead of it
page_params.can_subscribe_other_users is used to check whether
user is allowed to subscribe others or not. This code was
added in 272ed9068.
Though this could have been done in a different commit, but as
we are adding the code to use the correct updated value in this
commit only, this has been fixed here.
There is also no need of adding that complex logic to update the
correct 'page_params.can_subscribe_other_users' field on
'realm_update' event, as we are using user_can_subscribe_other_users
helper and thus we always use the updated values to check whether
the user is allowed to subscribe others or not.
This commit adds 'user_can_invite_others_to_realm' function
in settings_data.js which replaces all the instances of
'page_params.can_invite_others_to_realm'.
This change makes it possible to remove the complex logic of
updating 'page_params.can_invite_others_to_realm' on
'realm_update' event as we are using above added helper instead
of using page_params object and thus we always use the updated
value to check whether user can invite others or not.
The 'user_has_permission' helper will be used by functions added
for create_stream_policy and invite_to_stream_policy in further
commits and will help in avoiding code duplication.
This commit replaces different objects - create_stream_policy_values,
invite_to_realm_policy_values and invite_to_stream_policy_values,
with a single object common_policy_values.
Though invite_to_realm_policy do not use other fields of objects like
description, order, etc. but we can keep it as it is for now as we
would separate this setting from "Are invitations required...."
dropdown and these fields will be used then.
This is a prep commit for commits that will add helper functions in
settings_data for these policies replacing the usage of page_params
object.
Abhijeet Prasad Bodas
Aman Agrawal
Vishnu KS
Riken Shah
Sumanth V Rao
Ken Clary
sahil839
Tim Abbott
Nikhil Maske
Ganesh Pawar
Anders Kaseorg
m-e-l-u-h-a-n