We want to avoid passing opaque messages around to
low-level functions that only need certain fields.
This sets us up to handle mark-as-unread messages
that aren't necessarily full messages.
We only care about ~8 fields from a Zulip message
when we're tracking unread counts. For example, we
don't care about the "content" field. This also sets
us up to pull up the "display_recipient" logic in an
upcoming commit.
We've had for years a subtle bug, where after editing a topic in the
left sidebar that had previously had unread messages (but doesn't
anymore), the old topic might still appear in the sidebar.
The bug was hard to notice except for new organizations or in the
development environment, because the pre-edit topic appeared with a
sort key of -Infinity (that being the max ID in an empty list of
message IDs). But this is an important onboarding bug in reducing
faith in Zulip's topic editing just working, so I'm glad to have it
fixed.
Fixes#11901.
This reduces the complexity of our dependency graph.
It also makes sub_store.get parallel to message_store.get.
For both you pass in the relevant id to get the
full validated object.
ES and TypeScript modules are strict by default and don’t need this
directive. ESLint will remind us to add it to new CommonJS files and
remove it from ES and TypeScript modules.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Prettier would do this anyway, but it’s separated out for a more
reviewable diff. Generated by ESLint.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Prettier would do this anyway, but it’s separated out for a more
reviewable diff. Generated by ESLint.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Prettier would do this anyway, but it’s separated out for a more
reviewable diff. Generated by ESLint.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
We had a bug where if your peer mentioned you in
message, but then edited the message not to mention
you, the latter wouldn't reset your unread counts
for "Mentions". And the same problem would happen
vice versa.
The fix basically extracts `update_message_for_mention`
and makes sure it handles all combinations of
unread/mentioned flags, instead of assuming
any invariants about which directions of change
are possible.
And then we call that new function from
`message_events.js` whenever we get message
edit events.
Fixes#14544
This is part of #6427, adding support for live-updating the Zulip UI
to move messages to a new topic.
As noted in the comments, there is still a bug to be fixed here
involving guest users, but the overall implementation is pretty well
tested manually (which is how we test most message-edit UI work since
there's so much complexity involved).
Co-Authored-By: Wbert Adrián Castro Vera <wbertc@gmail.com>
This flag was used to delay unread count updates while the bankruptcy
modal was visible. Now that bankrupcty is no longer a modal, we don't
need this flag at all.
Calling a function with hundreds of thousands to millions of
arguments, depending on the browser, can throw a RangeError. This was
true of both ids.push(...a) and the [].concat.apply construction that
it replaced in commit 59d55d1e06,
although the old one was less likely to overflow due to bucketing.
Use a loop instead.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
We now treat util like a leaf module and
use "require" to import it everywhere it's used.
An earlier version of this commit moved
util into our "shared" library, but we
decided to wait on that. Once we're ready
to do that, we should only need to do a
simple search/replace on various
require/zrequire statements plus a small
tweak to one of the custom linter checks.
It turns out we don't really need util.js
for our most immediate code-sharing goal,
which is to reuse our markdown code on
mobile. There's a little bit of cleanup
still remaining to break the dependency,
but it's minor.
The util module still calls the global
blueslip module in one place, but that
code is about to be removed in the next
few commits.
I am pretty confident that once we start
sharing things like the typeahead code
more aggressively, we'll start having
dependencies on util. The module is barely
more than 300 lines long, so we'll probably
just move the whole thing into shared
rather than break it apart. Also, we
can continue to nibble away at the
cruftier parts of the module.
Due to try-catch deoptimization, Babel strict mode for…of loops run
about 5× slower in Firefox than Babel loose mode for…of, native
for…of, or forEach (which are all about the same speed). Chrome
doesn’t seem to care.
For some reason we need to explicitly add the core-js Symbol polyfill
near the beginning of the common bundle. Otherwise it gets loaded at
the wrong time and the Casper tests fail.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
Babel strict generates more code for [...x] than you’d like, while
Babel loose mode assumes x is an array.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
Tim Abbott
Steve Howell
Sahil Batra
Priyank Patel
Anders Kaseorg
Steve Howell
Tim Abbott
Anders Kaseorg
shubhamgupta2956