do_clear_mobile_push_notifications_for_ids can now be used to
clear push_notification for multiple users at once. This method
loops over users, so no performance optimization is gained.
We've been seeing an exception in server_event_dispatch.js in
production where in large organizations, sometimes when a new user
joined, every other browser in the organization would throw an
exception processing some sort of realm_user/update event.
It turns out the cause was that when a user copies their profile from
an existing user account with a user-uploaded avatar, the code path we
reused to set the avatar properly send a realm_user/update event about
the avatar change -- for a user that hadn't been fully created and
certainly hadn't have the realm_user/add event sent for.
We fix this and add tests and comments to prevent it recurring.
(Removed an incorrect docstring while working on this).
The restart event was always handled pretty similarly
to pointer, so I use restart events now for this
test (in preparation of eliminating pointer events).
This eval function performs the inverse of the implicit
stringification that’s implied by this type-incorrect assignment in
do_update_user_custom_profile_data_if_changed:
field_value.value = field['value']
We believe there’s sufficient validation for the data being passed to
this eval that it could only have been exploited by a PostgreSQL
administrator editing the database manually.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This fixes an issues that causes HTML entities inside of inline code
blocks to be converted rather than being displayed literally.
The upstream python-markdown now handles this correctly, so we just use
their implementation with our changes for removing .strip(). As a result
of this migration, we switch backtick pattern to an inline processor
too.
Fixes#12056.
For the codeblock counterpart of this issue, we should follow the
upstream PR https://github.com/Python-Markdown/markdown/pull/990.
Co-authored-by: Rohitt Vashishtha <aero31aero@gmail.com>
* Reordered the settings relevant without stream creation to the top.
* Removed useless/misleading defaults for optional parameters.
* Clarified description of the announce and authorization_errors_fatal settings.
* Clarified that `invite_only` only applies for stream creation.
(It's annoying to do so for its friends because they are including
common description content and OpenAPI doesn't have a way to have
extra content in a place you included something)
Fixes#14705.
Now we are consistent about validating color/description.
Ideally we wouldn't need to validate the
`streams_raw` parameters multiple times per
request, but the outer function here changes
the error messages to explicitly reference
the "delete" and "add" request variables.
And for the situation where the user-supplied
parameters are correct, the performance penalty
for checking them twice is extremely negligible.
So it's probably fine for now to just make sure
we use the same validators in all the relevant
places.
There's probably some deeper refactor that we
can do to eliminate the whole `compose_views`
scheme. And it's also not entirely clear to
me that we really need to support the update
endpoint. But that's all out of the scope of
this commit.
Note that I don't actually convert the
checker from check_dict to check_dict_only,
because that would be a user-facing change,
but I think we can sweep a lot of things
like this after the next release.
This avoids some code duplication as well
as adding some missing fields.
We also use check_dict_only to prevent
folks from adding new fields to the
relevant events without updating these
tests. (A bigger sweep comes later.)
As the code comment indicates, we just
use a strict check here rather than
pretending that the test exercises a
more complicated schema for the config
data, which is dynamic in nature.
Cleaning up config_data is outside the
scope of this PR; my main goal is to
eliminate check_dict calls (usually in favor
of check_dict_only).
Because of other validation on these values, I don't believe any of
these does anything different, but these changes improve readability
and likely make GitHub's code scanners happy.
The helper should be used instead of constructing the dict manually.
Change get_account_data_dict, on GitHubAuthBackendTest
class, so it has a third argument, user_avatar_url.
This is a preparation for support using GitHub avatar
upon user resgistration (when the user logs using
GitHub).
Update the REQ check for profile_data in
update_user_backend by tweaking `check_profile_data`
to use `check_dict_only`.
Here is the relevant URL:
path('users/<int:user_id>', rest_dispatch,
{'GET': 'zerver.views.users.get_members_backend',
It would be nice to unify the validator
for these two views, but they are different:
update_user_backend
update_user_custom_profile_data
It's not completely clear to me why update_user_backend
seems to support a superset of the functionality
of `update_user_custom_profile_data`, but it has
this code to allow you to remove custom profile fields:
clean_profile_data = []
for entry in profile_data:
assert isinstance(entry["id"], int)
if entry["value"] is None or not entry["value"]:
field_id = entry["id"]
check_remove_custom_profile_field_value(target, field_id)
else:
clean_profile_data.append({
"id": entry["id"],
"value": entry["value"],
})
Whereas the other view is much simpler:
def update_user_custom_profile_data(
<snip>
) -> HttpResponse:
validate_user_custom_profile_data(user_profile.realm.id, data)
do_update_user_custom_profile_data_if_changed(user_profile, data)
# We need to call this explicitly otherwise constraints are not check
return json_success()
This tightens our checking of user-supplied data
for this endpoint:
path('users/me/profile_data', rest_dispatch,
{'PATCH': 'zerver.views.custom_profile_fields.update_user_custom_profile_data',
...
We now explicitly require the `value` field
to be present in the dicts being passed in
here, as part of `REQ`. There is no reason
that our current clients would be sending
extra fields here, and we would just ignore
them anyway, so we also move to using
check_dict_only.
Here is some relevant webapp code (see settings_account.js):
fields.push({id: field.id, value: user_ids});
update_user_custom_profile_fields(fields, channel.patch);
settings_ui.do_settings_change(method, "/json/users/me/profile_data",
{data: JSON.stringify([field])}, spinner_element);
The webapp code sends fields one at a time
as one-element arrays, which is strange, but
that is out of the scope of this change.
After some discussion, everyone seems to agree that 3.0 is the more
appropriate version number for our next major release. This updates
our documentation to reflect that we'll be using 3.0 as our next major
release.
`/api/v1/fetch_api_key`'s response had a key `email` with the user's
delivery email. But its JSON counterpart `/json/fetch_api_key`, which
has a completely different implementation, did not return `email` in
its success response.
So to avoid confusion, the non-API endpoint, `/json/fetch_api_key`
response has been made identical with it's `/api` counterpart by
adding the `email` key. Also it is safe to send as the calling user
will only see their own email.
We now have our muted topics use tuples internally,
which allows us to tighten up the annotation
for get_topic_mutes, as well as our schema
checking.
We want to deprecate sub_validator=None
for check_list, so we also introduce
check_tuple here. Now we also want to deprecate
check_tuple, but it's at least isolated now.
We will use this for data structures that are tuples,
but which are sent as lists over the wire. Fortunately,
we don't have too many of those.
The plan is to convert tuples to dictionaries,
but backward compatibility may be tricky in some
places.
This commit changes do_get_user_invites function to not return
multiuse invites to non-admin users. We should only return multiuse
invites to admins, as we only allow admins to create them.
This commit changes the PreregistrationUser.invite_as dict to have
same set of values as we have for UserProfile.role.
This also adds a data migration to update the already exisiting
PreregistrationUser and MultiuseInvite objects.
Streams can have lots of subscribers, meaning that the archiving process
will be moving tons of UserMessages per message. For that reason, using
a smaller batch size for stream messages is justified.
Some personal messages need to be added in test_scrub_realm to have
coverage of do_delete_messages_by_sender after these changes.
Currently, we use -1 as the Realm.message_retention_days value to retain
message forever unless specified at stream level for a particular stream,
that is, no policy set at the realm level. But this is incoherent with what
we use for Stream.message_retention_days where -1 means
> disable retention policy for this stream unconditionally
that can be confusing from an API standpoint.
So instead of trying some hack to reset the value to NULL or using some
other value like -2 for RETAIN_MESSAGE_FOREVER and use that for API. It is
much more intuitive to use a string like 'forever' that can be mapped to
RETAIN_MESSAGE_FOREVER at the backend. And this is similar to what we use
for streams settings as well.
To be more consistent with the meaning in the Stream model, and to make
it easier to have a reasonable settings API, we get rid of the None
value for Realm.message_retention_days in favor of the value -1 to
represent the "don't delete messages" default policy.
In 5200598a31, we introduced a new
client capability that can be used to avoid unreasonable network
bandwidth consumed sending avatar URLs of long term idle users in
organizations with 10,000s members.
This commit enables this feature and adds support for it to the web
client.
subdomain=None didn't make much sense as a value, and wasn't actually in
use anywhere, except one test where it was accidental. All tests specify
the subdomain explicitly, so we should change the type to str, and make
it an obligatory kwarg.
Adds the ability to set a SAML attribute which contains a
list of subdomains the user is allowed to access. This allows a Zulip
server with multiple organizations to filter using SAML attributes
which organization each user can access.
Cleaned up and adapted by Mateusz Mandera to fit our conventions and
needs more.
Co-authored-by: Mateusz Mandera <mateusz.mandera@zulip.com>
Also, `send_message` example is altered to send a message to the
stream 'social' to avoid getting a "first_message_id: null"
in the response for `get_subscriptions` example, that caused
`validate_against_openapi_schema` to throw an error.
The `EXCLUDE_PROPERTIES` is a dictionary in `zerver/openapi/openapi.py`
which holds the undocumented properties of our API. Document all
properties other than:
*`delivery_email` which is in another PR.
*'events' and 'register'.
*'/setting/notification' since its response is about to undergo heavy
changes.
A generator that yields values without receiving or returning them is
an Iterator. Although every Iterator happens to be iterable, Iterable
is a confusing annotation for generators because a generator is only
iterable once.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
In a decorator annotated with generic type (ViewFuncT) -> ViewFuncT,
the type variable ViewFuncT = TypeVar(…) must be instantiated to
the *same* type in both places. This amounts to a claim that the
decorator preserves the signature of the view function, which is not
the case for decorators that add a user_profile parameter.
The corrected annotations enforce no particular relationship between
the input and output signatures, which is not the ideal type we might
get if mypy supported variadic generics, but is better than enforcing
a relationship that is guaranteed to be wrong.
This removes a bunch of ‘# type: ignore[call-arg] # mypy doesn't seem
to apply the decorator’ annotations. Mypy does apply the decorator,
but the decorator’s incorrect annotation as signature-preserving made
it appear as if it didn’t.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Also enable warn_unused_ignores. I think the fact that there are so
few of these is good evidence that it’s not a significant burden for
people fixing type errors.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Migrations that add items to a table in the same migration htat
craetes the table require atomic=False.
This fixes this exception:
Running migrations:
Applying zerver.0287_clear_duplicate_reactions... OK
Applying zerver.0288_reaction_unique_on_emoji_code... OK
Applying zerver.0289_tighten_attachment_size... OK
Applying zerver.0290_remove_night_mode_add_color_scheme...Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/zulip/deployments/2020-06-22-23-20-36/zulip-py3-venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/backends/utils.py", line 84, in _execute
return self.cursor.execute(sql, params)
File "/home/zulip/deployments/2020-06-22-23-20-36/zerver/lib/db.py", line 33, in execute
return wrapper_execute(self, super().execute, query, vars)
File "/home/zulip/deployments/2020-06-22-23-20-36/zerver/lib/db.py", line 20, in wrapper_execute
return action(sql, params)
psycopg2.errors.ObjectInUse: cannot ALTER TABLE "zerver_userprofile" because it has pending trig
We only use this in a few places, but they're really important places
for understanding the types in the codebase, and so it's worth having
a bit of expository documentation explaining how we use it.
(And I expect we'll add more with time).
Fixes#14960.
The default of 6 thread may not be appropriate in certain
configurations. Taking half of the numer of CPUs available to the
process will be more flexible.
With this implementation of the feature of the automatic theme
detection, we make the following changes in the backend, frontend and
documentation.
This replaces the previous night_mode boolean with an enum, with the
default value being to use the prefers-color-scheme feature of the
operating system to determine which theme to use.
Fixes: #14451.
Co-authored-by: @kPerikou <44238834+kPerikou@users.noreply.github.com>
We can now invite new users as realm owners. We restrict only
owners to invite new users as owners both for single invite
and multiuse invite link. Also, only owners can revoke or resend
owner invitations.
Aman Agrawal
Tim Abbott
Steve Howell
Anders Kaseorg
Chris Heald
Clara Dantas
Mateusz Mandera
orientor
sahil839
Pragati Agrawal
Hashir Sarwar
Brainrecursion
wowol
Kartik Srivastava
Felix
MariaGkoulta