I noticed this because the test_events.py tests had the extremely
weird pattern of calling the actual change function, and then testing
the `notify` function's state changes (which should always be noops),
rather than actually testing the state change function.
Fixing the test made it clear that the actual logic in events.py
simply did not handle deleting custom_profile_field_value elements
from user objects when a custom_profile_field object was deleted.
So we fix that bit of logic as well.
It appears this bug was unique -- at least we don't have any other
notify_* functions being used directly in test_events.py, and the
handful of state_change_expected=False entries are all events for data
not present in page_params.
This add the schema checker, openapi schema, and also a test for
realm/deactivated event.
With several block comments by tabbott explaining the logic behind our
behavior here.
Part of #17568.
We discovered recently that some ops for events were just not
implemented in events.py (specifically, realm/deactivated).
Since our goal is for events.py to be complete, we add this bit of
hardening to ensure that it stays that way.
When we were getting an apply_event call for
a subscription/add event, we were trying not to
mutate the event itself, but this clumsy code
was still mutating the actual event:
# Avoid letting 'subscribers' entries end up in the list
for i, sub in enumerate(event['subscriptions']):
event['subscriptions'][i] = \
copy.deepcopy(event['subscriptions'][i])
del event['subscriptions'][i]['subscribers']
This is only a theoretical bug.
The only person who receives a subscription/add
event is the current user.
And it wouldn't have affected the current user,
since the apply_event was correctly updating the
state, and we wouldn't actually deliver the event
to the client (because the whole point of apply_event
is to prevent us from having to piggyback the
super-recent events on to our payload or put
them into the event queue and possibly race).
The new code just cleanly makes a copy of each
sub, if necessary, as we add them to state["subscriptions"].
And I updated the event schemas to reflect that
subscribers is always present in subscription/add
event.
Long term we should probably avoid sending subscribers
on this event when the clients don't set something
like include_subscribers. That's a fairly complicated
fix that involves passing in flags to ClientDescriptor.
Alternatively, we could just say that our policy is
that we never send subscribers there, but we instead
use peer_add events. See issue #17089 for more
details.
It's always cleaner to work in id space. It probably
would have required a perfect storm to have broken
the existing code, but using ids is obviously more
robust in theory, and just as simple.
We now require keywords, so that there is no
pitfall for mixing up boolean parameters.
Positional parameters are basically evil
when you have a bunch of bools.
I also make user_profile the first argument.
Finally, the code is more diff-friendly.
I eliminate the defaults, since the existing code
was already specificying values for most things.
I move all the booleans to the bottom for both
parameters and arguments.
I require explicit keywords for everything but
user_profile (which is now first).
And, finally, I format the code in a more
diff-friendly manner.
We now require explicit keywords for all arguments
to fetch_initial_state_data except user_profile.
We provide reasonable defaults to keep the test
code concise.
In 1bcb8d8ee8 I made
it so the webapp doesn't include "streams" in its
state from `fetch_initial_state_data`, but I didn't
address all the places in apply_event.
We now can send an implied matrix of user/stream tuples
for peer_add and peer_remove events.
The client code basically does this:
for stream_id in event['stream_ids']:
for user_id in event['user_ids']:
update_sub(stream_id, user_id)
We used to send individual events, which gets real
expensive when you are creating new streams. For
the case of copy-to-stream case, we should see
events go from U to 1, where U is the number of users
added.
Note that we don't yet fully optimize the potential
of this schema. For adding a new user with lots
of default streams, we still send S peer_add events.
And if you subscribe a bunch of users to a bunch of
private streams, we only go from U * S to S; we can't
optimize it down to one event easily.
We used to send occupy/vacate events when
either the first person entered a stream
or the last person exited.
It appears that our two main apps have never
looked at these events. Instead, it's
generally the case that clients handle
events related to stream creation/deactivation
and subscribe/unsubscribe.
Note that we removed the apply_events code
related to these events. This doesn't affect
the webapp, because the webapp doesn't care
about the "streams" field in do_events_register.
There is a theoretical situation where a
third party client could be the victim of
a race where the "streams" data includes
a stream where the last subscriber has left.
I suspect in most of those situations it
will be harmless, or possibly even helpful
to the extent that they'll learn about
streams that are in a "quasi" state where
they're activated but not occupied.
We could try to patch apply_event to
detect when subscriptions get added
or removed. Or we could just make the
"streams" piece of do_events_register
not care about occupy/vacate semantics.
I favor the latter, since it might
actually be what users what, and it will
also simplify the code and improve
performance.
The query to get "occupied" streams has been expensive
in the past. I'm not sure how much any recent attempts
to optimize that query have mitigated the issue, but
since we clearly aren't sending this data, there is no
reason to compute it.
user_profile will be None for web_public_guests here. Hence, for
settings (of which most be inaccessible by web public guest),
which require a user_profile, we either set an empty value for
them or set them to a default value. This will help render
the frontend or extend support to our clients without breaking
a lot of code.
Tweaked by tabbott to add many comments.
Some users setup zulip with trailing / at end, like 'https://meet.jit.si/
leading to extra / on clients while generating video chat link.
This commit removes trailing '/' if it exists to make it consistent. Manual
testing was done by generating jitsi url.
Fixes#16225
`update_message_flags` events used `operation` instead of `op`, the
latter being the standard field used in other events. So add `op`
field to `update_message_flags` and mark `operation` as deprecated,
so that it can be removed later.
JSON keys must be strings, and orjson enforces this. Mypy didn’t
catch the mismatched type of profiles_by_user_id because it doesn’t
understand CustomProfileFieldValue.field_id.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
There is still some miscellaneous cleanup that
has to happen for things like analytics queries
and dead code in node tests, but this should
remove the main use of pointers in the backend.
(We will also still need to drop the DB field.)
Because of other validation on these values, I don't believe any of
these does anything different, but these changes improve readability
and likely make GitHub's code scanners happy.
Two things were broken here:
* we were using name(s) instead of id(s)
* we were always sending lists that only
had one element
Now we just send "stream_id" instead of "subscriptions".
If anything, we should start sending a list of users
instead of a list of streams. For example, see
the code below:
if peer_user_ids:
for new_user_id in new_user_ids:
event = dict(type="subscription", op="peer_add",
stream_id=stream.id,
user_id=new_user_id)
send_event(realm, event, peer_user_ids)
Note that this only affects the webapp, as mobile/ZT
don't use this.
This adds a new client_capability that clients such as the mobile apps
can use to avoid unreasonable network bandwidth consumed sending
avatar URLs in organizations with 10,000s of users.
Clients don't strictly need this data, as they can always use the
/avatar/{user_id} endpoint to fetch the avatar if desired.
This will be more efficient especially for realms with
10,000+ users because the avatar URLs would increase the
payload size significantly and cost us more bandwidth.
Fixes#15287.
This line was effectively hardcoding a specific stream_post_policy,
overriding the value already present in the event, to no purpose.
(I believe it got here via cargo-culting induced by #13787.)
This commit removes is_old_stream property from the stream objects
returned by the API. This property was unnecessary and is essentially
equivalent to 'stream_weekly_traffic != null'.
We compute sub.is_old_stream in stream_data.update_calculated_fields
in frontend code and it is used to check whether we have a non-null
stream_weekly_traffic or not.
Fixes#15181.
This is designed to have no user-facing change unless the client
declares bulk_message_deletion in its client_capabilities.
Clients that do so will receive a single bulk event for bulk deletions
of messages within a single conversation (topic or PM thread).
Backend implementation of #15285.
Fixes#2665.
Regenerated by tabbott with `lint --fix` after a rebase and change in
parameters.
Note from tabbott: In a few cases, this converts technical debt in the
form of unsorted imports into different technical debt in the form of
our largest files having very long, ugly import sequences at the
start. I expect this change will increase pressure for us to split
those files, which isn't a bad thing.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Tim Abbott
shanukun
sahil839
Anders Kaseorg
Steve Howell
Aman Agrawal
S-Abhishek
orientor
Alex Vandiver
Hashir Sarwar
Vishnu KS