This commit removes the group date dividers from the message feed UI,
leaving only the dividers between individual messages. These are
considered unecessary as the recipient bar displays the date.
The change concerns message_list_view.js along with the templates
message_group.hbs and recipient_row.hbs.
Fixes#22966.
This commit updates the date row between messages and message
groups, removing the date of the previous message along with
the down arrow for the next message.
The goal of this commit is to declutter the message feed UI
as part of the redesign.
The change concerns the render functions in
timerender.js along with the files that reference these.
Fixes: #22967.
We directly check if message feed is visible in the code instead
of indirectly checking so via recent topics. This helps read the
code clearly and would be helpful with the upcoming inbox view.
We add a box shadow at top of the recipient bar to hide message
text that are partially visible above the recipient bar. At 100%
zoom, this issue is not visible but it has been reported by a user
at 150% zoom.
Following this change we don't need to do change any of our JS
calculations since `y` position of header remains the same
and when determining if a header `is_sticky` that is the only
thing we verify.
This should help considerably in the readability of this part of the
codebase; meanwhile, I also took the opportunity to note various TODOs
where we might have something simple we can do to simplify these data
structures or improve their interfaces.
The `next_is_same_sender` has no effect on the CSS of the message
displayed and the JS changes seem to have no effect too.
See cc8021a742 for more details.
The English word "at" was manually appended to the string output of
datetime-related functions to generate the string shown in the tooltip
when hovering over the timestamp of a message. Use the translated form
"{date} at {time}" instead, as found elsewhere in the codebase.
This only set the last_message CSS class, which is no longer used for
styling or JavaScript code.
(The calculation was also wrong, in that new messages arriving would
not cause it to be removed from the previous message with the
last_message class).
We now allow editing stream and topic of message even if
allow_message_editing if False using webapp given that is
allowed as per other topic and stream edit specific settings.
Fixes a part of #21739.
This is part of redesigning messages (#22059). This commit adds
classnames to messages with mentions, differentiating direct mentions
from wildcard mentions from usergroup mentions, and this set us up
for a future commit where we'll have those different kinds of messages
be displayed in different colors.
The table_name property was only ever undefined for the
special all_messages_list object.
In 6f764ce4b3, we downgraded that object
to only have a MessageListData; as a result, we now never construct a
MessageList or MessageListView without `table_name` set correctly.
We render a login button for images that failed to load for
spectators. The image failed to load most likely due to being
rate limited by the server.
Fixes#19840
We loop through edit history entries and see if any of them
are more interesting than a (un)resolve topic edit, extending
the existing loop we had.
We also update the associated node tests.
Fixes#19919.
Co-authored by: Lauryn Menard <lauryn@zulip.com>
It's 2022 and the WHATWG no longer recognizes the term URI. Everything
is now a URL or a type of URL. Which is great because it's way less
confusing. Details here:
https://url.spec.whatwg.org/
Previously, we used to only calculate sender_is_bot, sender_is_guest,
small_avatar_url and background_color on the message_container via
build_message_groups (ie via .render, which also gets called from
.rerender_with_target_scrolltop).
This would mean that if we tried to use `_rerender_message` to update
just a single message (which is something we'd like to do, in order to
make rerenders more efficient), these values would not update.
(This could lead to avatars not light-updating properly).
As such, this commit moves assignment of these values into
`set_calculated_message_container_variables`.
`bookend_top` is already defined firmly for `group` in
`add_subscription_marker`, so no need to redefine it.
`bookend_bottom` is no longer used anywhere in the codebase. Not
sure what the history is here.
We need to mark trailing bookends differently to identify them
in DOM easily. This fixes a bookend replication bug which can
happen sometimes when rendering.
We move the stream subscribed/unsubscribed bookend info from
js files to bookend handlebar.
Tweaked by tabbott to override the check-templates indentation logic.
This avoids the somewhat confusing visuals of showing messages as
EDITED where the content had not been changed, which also obscured
situations where a message had both been edited and moved.
It's possible we could do better with some sort of fancier block-move
visual styling, but it's a bit tricky to do well given that we support
moving multiple messages at once.
Fixes#20451.
It can be pretty annoying to lose your place when replying to an old
message, even though every other chat application does this. And it
doesn't really buy us much; the user can always scroll down if they
want to, we have a helpful notification about where their message is
(which could be improved), and then we don't need to add some sort of
new complicated logic to avoid marking messages as read unexpectedly,
which the existing logic for this block badly needed.
(It had existing logic of that form dating from the pre-unread counts
pointer era).
Fixes#11462.
The from_scroll=true setting has been present since essentially the
beginning of time (6ae117ea5f), and has
moved around a number of times since. It's possible that it was
correct with the UI model as originally implemented, but the behavior
it creates now is that sending a message in the home view does not
move the cursor, and sending in a narrow does, without any intent
behind that behavior.
Further, the logic for controlling whether to display a "Scroll down"
notification clearly expects that this code path will actually trigger
a scroll to the current message, which would be the case without the
from_scroll setting.
Previously, the "resolve/unresolve topic" checkmark option was displayed in recipient bars
was presented to users regardless of whether they had permission to resolve topics in that
stream, which was confusing.
Fixes#19880.
We use subs as a common variable name for a collection of stream
data structure used in settings, in lot of modules. So this
rename clears a bunch of related shadowed variables.
We split recent_topics module into recent_topics_(ui + data + util).
This allows us to reduce cyclical dependencies which were
created due to large list of imports in recent topics. Also, this
refactor on its own makes sense.
Joseph Hughes
Anders Kaseorg
Aman Agrawal
Tim Abbott
Josh Klar
Sahil Batra
evykassirer
Kartik Srivastava
Adam Sah
Greg Price
Austin Riba
jai2201
YashRE42
Swati Bhageria
AnshVM
m-e-l-u-h-a-n
akshatdalton
Priyank Patel
Dinesh