Previously when Github bot receives an update pull request event,it
will produce the following message:
user updated PR #1 Start writing unit tests from test to main
"from test to main" is improper and causes unnecessary confusion.
These changes will update the logic to remove the phrase from
update events. These changes will also include the org: prefix to
the branch names to keep it consistent with Github and further
reduce confusions on branch names.
Fixes#24536.
The list of supported events for filtering itself does not document what
each of the events does. Adding a link to GitHub's documentation would
be a pointer to get people started. But ideally we need to establish a
better system to document the events in general.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This unifies the length of the shortened SHA our integrations generate,
and ensures that they are long enough for projects of various sizes with
a chosen value defined in get_short_sha.
Fixes#23475
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
7 characters are not enough for large projects, so we change
it to reasonably longer. As an example, The Linux kernel needs
at least 11 characters of sha in its shortened form to identify
a revision. We pick 11 so it should work for most of the projects.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
markdown-include is GPL licensed.
Also, rewrite it as a block processor, so that it works correctly
inside indented blocks.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Adds request as a parameter to json_success as a refactor towards
making `ignored_parameters_unsupported` functionality available
for all API endpoints.
Also, removes any data parameters that are an empty dict or
a dict with the generic success response values.
We recently ran into a payload in production that didn't contain
an event type at all. A payload where we can't figure out the event
type is quite rare. Instead of letting these payloads run amok, we
should raise a more informative exception for such unusual payloads.
If we encounter too many of these, then we can choose to conduct a
deeper investigation on a case-by-case basis.
With some changes by Tim Abbott.
We add discussion id and url in the comments and highlighted title to
the body of disscussion message to make it more meaningful and accessible.
Fixes#19938.
We aim to use Zulip topics thoughtfully in displaying messages from
discussions, as well as linking to the discussion in every message so
that it's easy to view them.
Fixes#19938.
Since FIXTURE_DIR_NAME is the name of the folder that contains the view
and tests modules of the webhook and another folder called "fixtures" that
store the fixtures, it is more appropriate to call it WEBHOOK_DIR_NAME,
especially when we want to refer to the view module using this variable.
Move `get_setup_webhook_message` to
`zerver/lib/webhooks/common.py` so multiple integrations can use this
rather than just those which import `zerver/lib/webhooks/git.py`. Also
added the documentation for this.
I have added a documentation page for the GitHub Actions integration to
`/integrations/doc/github-actions` with a link to the Zulip GitHub
Actions repository.
Tweaked by tabbott to add cross-links with the main GitHub integration.
This change updates the GitHub Integration webhook
get_opened_or_update_pull_request_body method so that
the description is only printed if it actually changes.
If the update event is a result of some other
attribute update, such as an asignee change, then the
description is not included in the message sent to
the zulip stream.
Fixes#16345
This clears it out of the data sent to Sentry, where it is duplicative
with the indexed metadata -- and potentially exposes PHI if Sentry's
"make this issue public" feature is used.
Any exception is an "unexpected event", which means talking about
having an "unexpected event logger" or "unexpected event exception" is
confusing. As the error message in `exceptions.py` already explains,
this is about an _unsupported_ event type.
This also switches the path that these exceptions are written to,
accordingly.
8e10ab282a moved UnexpectedWebhookEventType into
`zerver.lib.exceptions`, but left the import into
`zserver.lib.webhooks.common` so that webhooks could continue to
import the exception from there.
This clutters things and adds complexity; there is no compelling
reason that the exception's source of truth should not move alongside
all other exceptions.
If there are unsupported keys, we still log an error,
but we now also send a message to the stream. (This
is a good tradeoff for the github webhook, since users
can just turn off notifications if they find it spammy.
Also, we intend to support "repository" soon.)
This is a bit of an experiment to see how this plays
in the field:
* will customers notice the change?
* will Sentry reports look any different?
The main thing fixed here is that we weren't turning
on our keys into a list. And then I refined the message
a bit more, including sorting the keys.
I also avoid the unnecessary "else".
The EVENT_FUNCTION_MAPPER maps a string event name
to a function handler. Before this we circumvented
mypy checks with a call to get_body_function_based_on_type,
which specified Any as the type of our event function.
Now the types are rigorous.
This change was impossible without the recent commit
to introduce the Helper class.
The Helper class will soon grow, but the immediate
problem it solves is the need to jankily inspect
the parameters of our get_*_body function.
Most of the changes were handled by an ad hoc
munge.py script.
The substantive changes were adding the Helper
class and passing it in.
And then the linter discovered a place where
the optional include_title parameter wasn't used
(which is one of the reasons to avoid the janky
inspect-signature technique).
As a side note, none of the include_title parameters
needed a default value of False, as we always passed
in an explicit value.
We test cover both sides of include_title, which
you can verify by hard coding it to either True or
False (and seeing the relevant failures), although I
suspect most individual codepaths
only test one value, based on whether "topic" is in
the fixture or not.
Finally, I know Helper is not a great name, but I
intend to evolve the class a bit before deciding
whether a more descriptive name is helpful here.
(For example, an upcoming commit will add a
log_unexpected helper method.)
We get the header_event one level up the call
stack now, too.
It's somewhat annoying that we have our own
concept of "event" here, instead of just returning
our event handlers directly, or just calling them
directly, but it's a bit non-trivial to fix that
right away.
In passing, I remove the strange OR for "ping",
which is already a key in EVENT_FUNCTION_MAPPER.
See https://github.com/zulip/zulip/issues/16258 for
possible follow up here.
We now ignore the following two new pull_request
actions (as well as the three existing ones
from before):
approved
converted_to_draft
As the issue above indicates, we may want to actually
support "approved" if we can find somebody to work
on the webhook. (And then the issue goes a little
broader than what changed here.)
We consolidate the tests and remove the fixtures, which
just have a lot of noisy fields that we ignore. Also,
pull_request__request_review_removed was named improperly.
Joelute
Zixuan James Li
Anders Kaseorg
Christopher Chong
Lauryn Menard
Eeshan Garg
Shlok Patel
PIG208
Adam Birds
Tushar Upadhyay
cozyrohan
Alex Vandiver
Steve Howell