Calls to `render_markdown_path` weren't getting cached since the context
argument is unhashable, and the `ignore_unhashable_lru_cache` decorator ignores
such calls. This commit adds a couple of more decorators - one which converts
dict arguments to the function to a dict items tuple, and another which converts
dict items tuple arguments back to dicts. These two decorators used along with
the `ignore_unhashable_lru_cache` decorator ensure that the calls to
`render_markdown_path` with the context dict argument are also cached.
The time to run zerver.tests.test_urls.PublicURLTest.test_public_urls drops by
about 50% from 8.4s to 4.1s with this commit. The time to run
zerver.tests.test_docs.DocPageTest.test_doc_endpoints drops by about 20% from
3.2s to 2.5s.
Previously, these cache keys looked like:
:1:9c26164d3a393e316e0f8210efe270e08710d45astream_by_realm_and_name:...
Now, they look like this:
:1:9c26164d3a393e316e0f8210efe270e08710d45a:stream_by_realm_and_name:...
This commit leverages the ahocorasick algorithm to build a set of user_ids
that have their alert_words present in the message. It runs in linear time
of the order of length of the input message as opposed to number of
alert_words. This is after building a ahocorasick Automaton which runs
in O(number of alert_words in entire realm) which is usually cached.
Refactor the potentially expensive work done by Beautiful Soup into a
function that is called by the alter_content function, so that we can
cache the result. Saves a significant portion of the runtime of
loading of all of our /help/ and /api/ documentation pages (e.g. 12ms
for /api).
Fixes#11088.
Tweaked by tabbott to use the URL path as the cache key, clean up
argument structure, and use a clearer name for the function.
A key part of this is the new helper, get_user_by_delivery_email. Its
verbose name is important for clarity; it should help avoid blind
copy-pasting of get_user (which we'll also want to rename).
Unfortunately, it requires detailed understanding of the context to
figure out which one to use; each is used in about half of call sites.
Another important note is that this PR doesn't migrate get_user calls
in the tests except where not doing so would cause the tests to fail.
This probably deserves a follow-up refactor to avoid bugs here.
This is initial work, which will help us establish habits of using a
well-tested approach for renaming a Zulip organization (since as part
of https://github.com/zulip/zulip-mobile/issues/3142, we'll likely
need to make this function do more).
This supports guest user in the user-info-form-modal as well as in the
role section of the admin-user-table.
With some fixes by Tim Abbott and Shubham Dhama.
We don't want really long urls to lead to truncated
keys, or we could theoretically have two different
urls get mixed up previews.
Also, this suppresses warnings about exceeding the
250 char limit.
Finally, this gives the key a proper prefix.
Now reading API keys from a user is done with the get_api_key wrapper
method, rather than directly fetching it from the user object.
Also, every place where an action should be done for each API key is now
using get_all_api_keys. This method returns for the moment a single-item
list, containing the specified user's API key.
This commit is the first step towards allowing users have multiple API
keys.
We solved the problem the TODO raised by using a different type
annotation syntax, and I'm not sure whether that refactor would
actually improve the code.
This is a wrapper over lru_cache function. It adds following features on
top of lru_cache:
* It will not cache result of functions with unhashable arguments.
* It will clear cache whenever zerver.lib.cache.KEY_PREFIX changes.
The previous implementation had a subtle caching bug: because it was
sharing its cache with the `get_user_profile_by_email` cache, if a
user happened to have an email in that cache, we'd return it, even
though that user didn't match `base_query`.
This causes `get_cross_realm_users` to no longer have a problematic
caching bug.
Along with fixing some minor bugs, this requires extracting out the
default functions so that we can do type: ignores on them properly.
While we're at it, we switch to the Python 3 syntax.
Before this change, we populated two cache entries for each
message that we sent. The entries were largely redundant,
with the only difference being whether we sent the content
as raw markdown or as the rendered HTML.
This commit makes it so we only have one cache entry per
message, and it includes both content and rendered_content.
One legacy source on confusion here is that `content`
changes meaning when you're on the front end. Here is the
situation going forward:
database:
content = raw
rendered_contented = rendered
cache entry:
content = raw
rendered_contented = rendered
payload for the frontend:
content = raw (for apply_markdown=False)
content = rendered (for apply_markdown=True)
Every time we updated a UserProfile object, we were calling
delete_display_recipient_cache(), which churns the cache and
does an extra database hop to find subscriptions. This was
due to saying `updated_fields` instead of `update_fields`.
This made us prone to cache churn for fields like UserProfile.pointer
that are fairly volatile.
Now we use the helper function changed(). To prevent the
opposite problem, we use all the fields that could invalidate
the cache.
This is a prepatory commit that adds non-active users to
the realm user cache. It mostly involves name changes and
removing an `is_active` filter from the relevant DB query.
The only consumer of this cache is `get_raw_user_data`, which
now filters on `is_active` in a dictionary comprehension (but
this will get moved around a bit in a subsequent commit).
We now have a dedicated cache for active_user_ids() that only
stores a list of user_ids.
Before this commit, active_user_ids() used a cache of UserProfile
dictionaries, so it incurred unnecessary deserialization costs for
all the user fields that it sliced away in a list comprehension.
Because the cache is skinnier here, we also need to invalidate it
less frequently. Basically, all we care about is new users, realm
deactivations, and user deactivations.
It's hard to measure how much this will improve performance, because
the speedup for any operation here is pretty minor, but we use this
function a lot, so hopefully it will make the overall system more
healthy.